Login   Register     FAQ    Members

View unanswered posts   View active topics


Board index .:|:. Slogging at Lessons :: Books .:|:. Special Sixth
It is currently 19 May 2013, 19:35

Forum rules


Please ensure that all posts are kept impersonal. Any posts involving an ad hominem attack will be edited or deleted. Please feel free to express your views, but expect that others may disagree with them. Please limit the use of the :oops: smiley as far as possible. Please do not PM another user to argue with them; if this happens, please can the recipient contact a mod. Language of gentlemen, chaps!



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 20:08 
Offline
Drinking gin out of a Russian doll
Drinking gin out of a Russian doll
User avatar

Joined: 04 Oct 2005, 11:48
Posts: 1188
Location: London
The smoking ban came in in 2007 in England and slightly earlier in the other countries in the UK.

IIRC some of the early 20th century marketing for cigarettes described the 'health benefits' didn't it?

_________________
http://www.livejournal.com/users/kathrynw/


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 20:26 
Offline
Arguing with your guardian

Joined: 19 Jun 2011, 22:46
Posts: 7
2007 wasn't it? July I think, when it became law over here. Ireland and one of the American states had it first years before.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 22:01 
So it's pretty recent, isn't it? But before then, because the health risks were known, it was on the decline ... I do find the casual-ness of smiking in the CS books dating. That's not negative dating, just an indication of their time.


Top | End
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 23:16 
Offline
Playing end of term games
Playing end of term games
User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:20
Posts: 2507
Location: Devon and Bristol
IDK - if I read a book today about a school, I'd expect to have some scene about stressed-out over-worked teachers having a quick fag to get them through next lesson by the school gates. Admittedly it would be less casual and there would be more justification of the above nature, but I still wouldn't be surprised to see it in there.

_________________
"His distinguished air, his handsome dark face, his composed attitude - for he stood perfectly still with one hand at his side - gave singular effect to the circumstance of his being without a hat." - 'Tales of Angria'


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 23:59 
Offline
Horror! New girl criticises school!
Horror! New girl criticises school!
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 22:35
Posts: 1772
Location: Berkshire, England
JayB wrote:
It would be interesting to know the precise dates of publication. The Munich crisis was in late summer 1938, and for a time people in the UK really did think the country was about to go to war. Jo's passing reference to Hitler would have a very different impact then compared to earlier in the year, or in 1937 - when EBD presumably wrote it. And of course if New was published later than March 1938 EBD's readers already knew about the Anschluss.

Similarly with Exile, published in 1940. If it was later than June, France had fallen and readers knew that the school couldn't stay in Guernsey, even while they were reading about Madge and Jem in Austria talking about taking the School and San there.


Exile was published March 1940. That indicates a surprisingly speedy publication after it was written, as we know the triplets were born November 1939, she can't have finished it any earlier than Dec 1939, and she had to correct it and type a fair copy for the publishers. I wonder if they rushed it through because of the topicality?

New CS was April 1938. They don't all have month of publication, though several around this time do. Goes to it is Oct 1941.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 00:40 
Offline
Having a say in the Sale theme
Having a say in the Sale theme
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 22:19
Posts: 3507
Location: Melbourne, Australia
ivohenry wrote:
Exile was published March 1940. That indicates a surprisingly speedy publication after it was written, as we know the triplets were born November 1939, she can't have finished it any earlier than Dec 1939, and she had to correct it and type a fair copy for the publishers. I wonder if they rushed it through because of the topicality?


Just because the triplets are born in November doesn't mean she had to be writing it after that. You can write about future events if you already have the timeline in place for them. She could realistically have begun writing Exile any time after 12 March 1938 when the Anschluss took place, so she might have been writing it and editing New at the same time.

ivohenry wrote:
New CS was April 1938. They don't all have month of publication, though several around this time do. Goes to it is Oct 1941.


Where did you get the information about the months?

_________________
The writer's credo: 'Sometimes you've got to sacrifice the things you like' (Delta Goodrem - Born To Try)


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 09:43 
Offline
Rescuing a Junior from the lake
Rescuing a Junior from the lake
User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2004, 13:57
Posts: 6992
Location: Manchester
We'll never know how far ahead she was thinking: I wish we could! War was only declared in September 1939 so she can't have written most of the second part of Exile any earlier than that, but I'd think she'd probably had the idea of "wholesale" Jo having triplets, and decided on the names, well beforehand. She may well have had to change things as she went along.

She certainly must've had to do a lot of thinking on her feet, especially once Guernsey was occupied and her plans for having the school there were ruined, and as she was writing about the school's move to Armishire there was a very real fear of invasion and just no way of knowing how things might've changed again before Goes To It made it into publication. My brain focuses much better on the period before 1914 than it does on anything recent so I can't imagine what it must be like to write in real time during a time when it must have seemed that the whole world could be about to turn upside down, and I find it fascinating that EBD did that.

_________________
We really must stop eating like this ...

Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open.



Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 09:52 
Offline
Being taken down a peg or two
Being taken down a peg or two
User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2005, 11:17
Posts: 621
Location: Cumbria
julieanne1811 wrote:
So it's pretty recent, isn't it? But before then, because the health risks were known, it was on the decline ... I do find the casual-ness of smiking in the CS books dating. That's not negative dating, just an indication of their time.


I've found novels from 1970s dated because of the attitude to alcohol, with a very casual attitude to drinking and driving, which dates them to me more than smoking. The smoking in the CS books doesn't jar with me at all, perhaps because I read a lot of fiction from the 1930s and 1940s, and it's so usual to find social smokers.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned on this thread is language. EBD didn't allow slang at the CS and a number of people have cited that (in articles, etc) as a reason why the series hasn't dated in the same way as other school stories where there's a lot of 1920s slang.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 12:36 
Offline
Learning to play Lacrosse
Learning to play Lacrosse
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006, 13:28
Posts: 461
Location: SE England
Thanks for those dates, Ivohenry.

So the Anschluss had already happened when New came out. I wonder if that's why EBD then wrote India, because of the uncertainty over what was going to happen in Europe - especially if she was planning and writing it in the summer and autumn of 1938, during and after Munich.

Or maybe she wrote the first half of Exile in real time too, in the summer of 1938, but didn't know how to finish it, or her publishers didn't want it at that point, so she put it aside until war had broken out and her publishers then asked for it.

I agree she must have been writing the second half of Exile in real time. She mentions RL events, such as the Germans claiming to have sunk HMS Ark Royal, which happened (the German claim, not the sinking) in late Sept/Oct 1939.

I don't know if publication of Exile was hurried forward because of its topicality - and the fact that there hadn't been a CS book for a while - but turnaround between acceptance of a ms and publication was much shorter in the past than it is today, when you're generally looking at a year between acceptance and publication for fiction.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 14:46 
Offline
Playing Impertinent Questions
Playing Impertinent Questions
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 21:21
Posts: 581
Location: London, UK
The smoking thing doesn't jar with me because until recently it was so normal. I smoked very heavily for 25 years, loved it, and still miss it even though I gave it up over 15 years ago! But it would be impractical now - I feel sorry for those young people who are tempted to take it up simply because it is so addictive, and such a very awkward addiction to have in this day and age!

What does jar is the very unsafe travelling arrangements when they go anywhere by car - babies being held on people's laps, and so on. Yet I do remember being put to bed in the back of my father's estate car and being driven home like that - and similar travel arrangements. The first cars I remember didn't even have seat belts in them, and for many years they only had them in the front.
Strange that it should jar, but it does!


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 15:06 
Offline
Learning to play Lacrosse
Learning to play Lacrosse
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006, 13:28
Posts: 461
Location: SE England
It's not mentioned, but many of the older CS characters had probably never taken a driving test. It didn't become compulsory in the UK until June 1935, when anyone who had started driving on or after 1 April 1934 was required to have passed the test.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kin ... st#History

(I'm not sure whether my father ever took a test. He was just 18 on 1 April 1934, and was certainly already riding motorbikes, although I don't know if he had learned to drive a car by then.

One of my uncles, who was a few years older, never took a test until he was required to do so to be a driver in the Army in WWII.)


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 17:10 
Offline
Having Miss Ferrars as Form Mistress
Having Miss Ferrars as Form Mistress
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep 2011, 17:25
Posts: 451
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
JayB wrote:
There's a chapter in Stalky & Co where the three boys smoke a cigar between them and are very sick as a result. Then the Headmaster catches them and sends them back to school to be punished by their housemaster. (I can't remember if the punishment was for the smoking, or because they were out of bounds, or both.) We know Joey, and therefore EBD, had read Stalky, so maybe this is where she got the idea that smoking makes young people sick.


Stalky and co. are regular smokers by this stage, but what makes them sick is that they are smoking a particularly strong Indian cheroot. They are punished primarily for being out of bounds when there is an outbreak of diptheria in the area. They seem to do all their smoking out of bounds, which implies that it is against the rules, but it's clearly not considered as heinous an offence as getting drunk, for which the punishment was public flogging followed by expulsion.

KathrynW wrote:
IIRC some of the early 20th century marketing for cigarettes described the 'health benefits' didn't it?


In The King's Speech you see his speech therapist (the one before Lionel) telling him to inhale deeply because the smoke will relax his larynx.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 17:16 
Offline
Horror! New girl criticises school!
Horror! New girl criticises school!
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 22:35
Posts: 1772
Location: Berkshire, England
KB wrote:
.

ivohenry wrote:
New CS was April 1938. They don't all have month of publication, though several around this time do. Goes to it is Oct 1941.


Where did you get the information about the months?


Info from the books, first editions, back of title page.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 19:37 
Offline
Arguing with your guardian
User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:25
Posts: 3
Location: London
JayB wrote:
It's not mentioned, but many of the older CS characters had probably never taken a driving test. It didn't become compulsory in the UK until June 1935, when anyone who had started driving on or after 1 April 1934 was required to have passed the test.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kin ... st#History

(I'm not sure whether my father ever took a test. He was just 18 on 1 April 1934, and was certainly already riding motorbikes, although I don't know if he had learned to drive a car by then.

One of my uncles, who was a few years older, never took a test until he was required to do so to be a driver in the Army in WWII.)


That reminded me of the incident where Louise drives Miss Annersley (I can't remember which book but its one of the Tyrol ones). I always found it amusing that Louise (the pupil) drives Miss Annersley (her teacher) rather than vice versa. I presume Louise (who I think was from a wealthy family?) would have had access to a car and lessons which Miss Annersley would not have done.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 21:24 
Meg14 wrote:
That reminded me of the incident where Louise drives Miss Annersley (I can't remember which book but its one of the Tyrol ones). I always found it amusing that Louise (the pupil) drives Miss Annersley (her teacher) rather than vice versa. I presume Louise (who I think was from a wealthy family?) would have had access to a car and lessons which Miss Annersley would not have done.


I'd vaguely assumed it wasn't that Hilda couldn't drive (doesn't she drive in one of the UK books, the one where Madge is visiting and wants to borrow the school runabout when H and Rosalie get back from somewhere - or is it Rosalie behind the wheel?), but for much the same reason that, if they'd been on foot and carrying something, Louise would have carried it, not Hilda - because driving would have been the chauffeur-ish, subservient role of the two, and the polite, responsible schoolgirl would naturally take it. The passenger would have had more status than whoever was at the wheel at a time when, if you had a car, you often also had a driver...? Now we assume that the person at the wheel is the one with the authority.


Last edited by Cosimo's Jackal on 20 Nov 2011, 22:32, edited 1 time in total.

Top | End
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 21:49 
In which book is this, please? I don't think it was in Armada, and I'm not sure I have it at all.

It's interesting that you interpret Louise driving Hilda Annersely as a matter of courtesy, Cosimo. I see what you mean when it's translated to carrying things, but the carrying courtesy doesn't quite mirror an equivalent driving courtesy, if you see what I mean?

Whose car was it?


Top | End
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 21:57 
Offline
Annoying a Sixth Former
Annoying a Sixth Former
User avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 08:12
Posts: 603
Location: London
Isn't that in New? They're driving back form the old Saints/Jem and Madge's holiday home? I think I recall it being Jem's car.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 22:25 
New House or New Chalet School, please?


Top | End
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 22:28 
Offline
Annoying a Sixth Former
Annoying a Sixth Former
User avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 08:12
Posts: 603
Location: London
I think New Chalet School but I am hazarding a guess. I think it's after Sybil is kidnapped and is found again.


Top | End
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historical Context
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2011, 22:48 
Offline
Having a say in the Sale theme
Having a say in the Sale theme
User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2004, 22:19
Posts: 3507
Location: Melbourne, Australia
ivohenry wrote:
Info from the books, first editions, back of title page.


Thank you. I never thought to look there! :banghead:

Now that I have, though, there are several hints that may suggest outside events had a distinct effect on the publication of Chalet School books. This is the list of the first fifteen books, after which point, as far as I could see, there were no more months listed in the publication information:

School at - Oct 1025
Jo of - Oct 1926
Princess - Sept 1927
Head Girl - No month 1928
Rivals - Aug 1929
Eustacia - Aug 1930
And Jo - Aug 1931
Camp - No month 1932
Exploits - July 1933
Lintons - Sep 1934
New House - No month 1935
Jo Returns - No month 1936
New - April 1938
Exile - March 1940
Goes To It - Oct 1941

The glitch of two books suddenly being published in the first half of the relevant year (after a book not having appeared in the previous year) suggest a likelihood of books being put on hold to wait for the outcome of significant events such as the declaration of war.

_________________
The writer's credo: 'Sometimes you've got to sacrifice the things you like' (Delta Goodrem - Born To Try)


Top | End
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next

Board index .:|:. Slogging at Lessons :: Books .:|:. Special Sixth
It is currently 19 May 2013, 19:35

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group