PatMac wrote: |
Judging by the reaction from long term inmates, we're in for a good tale. Hooray! |
Lisa_T wrote: |
How modern do you want, Pat? the kind that doesn't have any books? |
Lisa_T wrote: |
Lesley, uh, I realise this may not worry you, but I'm rather anxious to discover whether I make it out of the Study alive, so if you could oblige? |
Lisa_T wrote: |
Isn't there any more? Vikki, I could strangle you for raising my hopes like that!
*runs after Vikki* |
Rachael wrote: |
Fab beginning, Lesley - looking forward to more even if your title is a bit of a contradiction
How could you possibly have a "surfeit" of Rach(a)els?!! |
Lisa_T wrote: |
*lol* I was pleased too, until I twigged (courtesy of Donna, who took a very unfriendly pleasure in it) that my form are the equivalent of our yr 10s/ fourth form. |
Lisa_T wrote: |
I wish Lesley'd hurry up!
history reprobates did you say, Rachel? Can I remind you that you are much mroe likely to get into trouble than Kathryn or I- not being named Rach(a)el! |
Catherine_B wrote: |
*happy happy happy!*
Lesley, do you think the Real CS could accept a mistress who'd rather be a Ms? |
Quote: |
*hilda and bill's biggest fan, thanks to Lesley* |
Quote: |
*hilda and bill's biggest fan, thanks to Lesley* |
catherine wrote: |
Great to see this back, Lesley!! And I'm thrilled to be included on the list of form mistresses but it's Laidler not Laidlaw.
Looking forward to more whenever you have time! But please, spare Hilda from pain and torture - her poor body won't survive! |
Kathryn wrote: |
Do we forsee trouble with the male security guards in a school of 500 females?? |
Kathryn wrote: |
Do we forsee trouble with the male security guards in a school of 500 females?? |
Janet wrote: |
Lesley - Thanks for sending me Real CS and Santa, I really enjoyed them and they kept me from lurking too much on the board over the past two days!
Must say, you were very harsh on Matey - what had she done to become such a villain? Enjoying this story as well - hope you post more soon |