Sunglass wrote: |
Jo to the Rescue for me is a truly bizarre novel - most of it is about housework... |
R๓isํn wrote: |
This, for *me*, is what makes it her best book! EBD was all about selling a lifestyle and this book was where she indulged in a manual. |
Sunglass wrote: | ||
Absolutely she's selling a lifestyle - but I suppose I'd see the most immediately appealing aspects of that lifestyle in the more obviously 'continental' bits of the School - curtsies, Kartoffeln and trilingualism etc. Dainty cubicles and TTirolean lakes and so on. Isn't this book one of her least life-style-y, or am I misunderstanding what you mean? |
R๓isํn wrote: |
I mean lifestyle as in her middle-to-upper-class ideals of literally how to live eg what to eat, when to eat it, how to do your hair, what way to cut the bread for the tea, and what the proper conversation is to have around that tea etc etc. It's the detail in the ordinary, rather than in the exceptional (which is what I would see as attractive in the continental bits). |
Mona wrote: |
The one thing that does bother me is the relationship between Phoebe and Frank Peters. I'm sure I wouldn't have noticed it had I first read the book as a child, and perhaps standards of medical ethics were different then (although I doubt it), but Phoebe's engagement, within what seems to be a matter of weeks, to a doctor who was treating her, is just all sorts of wrong. I I think it's the fact that Jem and Jack seem to actively encourage it that bothers me most. I like Phoebe and Frank together, but really just can't get past the utter inappropriateness of their relationship. |
Sunglass wrote: |
Though there's a Lifestyle Baby moment in 'A Future CS Girl' that always cracks me up - the Maynards are making their way to the Tiernsee, get delayed en route by the tree falling, and as they finally approach Die Blumen, Geoff, a tired small baby, is depicted as longing for his milk, his cot and 'a nice, clean nighty'! Because God forbid that an EBD baby would happily countenance sleep in his grubby day clothes... |
Miss Di wrote: |
I don't like the way that Joey tries not to let Jack know what Margot is like (tanties and so on) but that is from a modern point of view. For the 1940s he was probably as hands on as a dad ever got to be. |
Pat wrote: |
All babies wore nighties in those days I think. I certainly don't remember seeing anything special for male babies, and bought nighties before my first was born. Babygrows were just coming in then and I had lots of those too. But nighties for night-time. |
Sunglass wrote: |
What tends to crack me up are some of what seem to me unnecessary elaborations in domestic procedure - even on a day we've been told several times is scorchingly hot, Louis and Tessa, aged three and two, are undressed and put into dressing gowns before being bathed! (A fear of infant nudity? The same thing comes up again in one of the Swiss books where a baby - Cecil? - is put into a dressing gown despite being put into her bath immediately after she's undressed, but I suppose that might be down to the cold, rather than some sense of baby nudity being improper!) |
Mrs Redboots wrote: |
Time and place - that was the norm back then. Even now, I (born ten years later than this story was set) feel rather odd if I don't put a dressing-gown on between my bedroom and the bathroom, and I'd not dream of doing so when visiting my parents. At least, not if I weren't wearing a nightie - my nighties are perfectly decent, so I don't worry if I am wearing one! |
Quote: |
Mary-Lou jumped up from the low stood on which she had
been sitting, for Anna came in with the big cans of hot and cold water,
and when Auntie Jo had tested the temperature of the mixture with her
elbow, Michael was popped in. He sat shrieking delightedly, and splashing
vigorously. Jo soaped him carefully, and then let the small girl squeeze
the sponge over him until all the soap was gone, and he was lifted out on
to the warm towel and dry-patted. 'Now you can go to the others, Mary-Lou,' said his mother as she picked up the big puff |
Kathy_S wrote: |
I have a feeling the puff anxiety must involve one of
those local language innuendos that go over my head.
The one thing that does strike me as odd is the lack of emotion over Bob's death. It comes across more as an inconvenience than a tragedy. *** As usual, I had vocabulary questions. 1. Is "sodger" derived from a real word, or is it a pure Debbyism? (I started out thinking it was a local pronunciation of 'soldier,' but that didn't make a lot of sense in the context. It could as easily rhyme with "roger.") 2. What's a wimberry? From the color I guessed it was more likely a blueberry/huckleberry relation than something from the blackberry/raspberry connection. 3. Whatever a Li-Lo is, two babies can lie on it. |
Kathy_S wrote: |
As usual, I had vocabulary questions. 3. Whatever a Li-Lo is, two babies can lie on it. |
Liz K wrote: |
As for Zephyr's age, isn't there a description of her wearing so much make-up she resembles an Easter Egg? In which case, I'd have put her in her early 20s. |
Alison H wrote: |
Seeing as it's Sunday night and I'm procrastinating from
going to bed, I've just looked this up! Apparently, what is known as a
wimberry here in Lancashire, and also in Yorkshire (where Rescue is set) and in most other parts
of Northern England, the Midlands and Wales (or sometimes as a whinberry),
is known as a whortleberry in the South of England, a blaeberry in
Scotland, and a bilberry and sometimes alternatively a huckleberry in
America. Why the same small fruit has so many different names I have no
idea
. I'm sure no-one wanted to know that, but I thought I'd write it down anyway! |
JenniferG wrote: |
How strange! I was brought up extremely close to where "Jo
to the Rescue" is set, and we've always called that particular fruit
bilberries. The only time I've heard them called wimberries was on a trip
to Wales last year.. -Jennifer |
JoMoran wrote: |
I like this one because we get to see something of the quartet grown up, although it is a very 'busy' book and I can understand why the publishers didn't think the readers would be very keen on it - hence why its hard to find - thank goodness for GGBP. As for the nightie thing - I think this was probably normal for the time and dressing gowns definately. |
patmac wrote: |
I've always thought that EBDs unconcern with Bob's death is due to her including it as a plot device to add some uncertainty to where the Maynards were going to live? She does make Jo seem casual and unconcerned about it but, in the context of the conversation, I think we might well be criticizing her for writing an emotionally overwrought Jo if she had seemed upset. |
Sunglass wrote: |
Does anyone think this may have been one of the moments she planned to write Jo off in a different direction, away from the CS, and that maybe she planned novels about Jo as chatelaine of Pretty Maids? |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod.
All times are GMT