#1: Books: Janie Steps In Author: Róisín, Location: IrelandPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:37 pm — Published in 1953, Janie Steps In
links into the CS-world via the usual La Rochelle connections. Nan
Blakeney comes to stay with Janie and Julian Lucy in Guernsey, after
her mother has been killed in a car accident. The book describes how
she recovers, under Janie's care. There is also description of how
Peter Chester lost his money and how the Chesters are coping. During a
picnic, Nan meets David Willoughby, whom she later marries.
So what did you think of this book? How do you feel about the treatment
of Beth Chester at this stage? Do you like the portrayal of the Lucy's
home life? What about Nan's engagement to David - is it too soon; do
they know each other well enough?
Any opinions you have on this book, the last of the La Rochelle series, please join in and post below
Next Sunday: The Chalet School in Exile
#2: Author: Alison H, Location: ManchesterPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:25 pm — I felt very sorry for Beth, who really did seem
to be hard done by - it was apparently OK for relatives to pay for
everyone else's schooling but not hers, and then her parents objected
to her making friends at the school they did
send her to. I found the Chesters' reaction to their financial woes a
bit pathetic generally - Anne just seemed to wallow in doom and gloom
instead of doing anything practical .
I really liked Janie in the way she reacted to Nan's engagement: I
thought she was very sensible. Obviously some people get engaged after
not knowing each other long and then have very happy marriages, but I
liked Janie's gentle caution, as opposed to Joey Maynard pressurising
Len into making a decision about Reg (OK, Len and Reg'd known each
other for ages, but not in a romantic way).
Ooh good, Exile next week!
#3: Author: jennifer, Location: TaiwanPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:57 am — I also feel sorry for Beth. For a twelve year
old she's gone through a major upset in her life, from indulged
daughter of a well-to-do family with holidays in France, a governess,
private lessons, lots of play time etc. to a second rate school where
she's not allowed to make friends because the girls are the wrong
class, having to do chores and look after her younger siblings rather
than play. Add to that distracted parents and a frail baby sister who
needs all their attention, and you've got a very unhappy pre-teen.
*Then* her parents let family help all the children *except* Beth
(making her feel abandoned), and Anne seems determined to alienate the
girl as much as possible without listening to anyone else. If the CS
hadn't shown up, there could easily have been a permanent rift between
the two.
I like Janie in this book. It's sort of like Joey, but with tact,
less ego, and a more balanced outlook on life. Her concern for both Nan
and Anne is genuine, and she's doing her best to help them. Her advice
to Nan re the engagement is very sound and much more reasonable than
instantly becoming engaged to the first man you meet after leaving
school. She's not saying don't do it, she's saying, wait and see and
make sure this is what you want. Someone needed to tell Len that in
Prefects.
I also like the view of Nan and her grief. In many of the CS books,
grief is passed over fairly lightly - a parent dies, the child is told
to keep a stiff upper lip, and all is well. Nan is still grieving, and
needs both time and help to move on with her life.
I also like the kids - Mike and Bill on the ship, and the Lucy kids at
home. They're funny and not portrayed as either unrealistically good or
irredeemably bad.
#4: Author: Caroline, Location: ManchesterPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:42 am — I like this book a lot, although it is probably
the La Rochelle I have read the fewest times. In some ways, it reads to
me as a bit of an afterthought. EBD has married off all of her La
Rochelle heroines that really matter and to keep this story young and
not all about
married-people-with-very-young-children-who-have-money/baby/marital-problems,
has to import a person we haven't previously met - Nan.
Having said that, I like Nan, and I like the way Janie handles her.
I find Rosamund's love for Nan and lack of ability to help her rather
tragic - poor, poor Rosamund, so desperate to help and so unable to do
so - and it's very brave of her to admit that she can't help and send
Nan to Janie.
It's also very good of Janie to take in a very needy perfect
stranger when she is already knee-deep in children (her own and her
nieces and nephews), and is also pregnant for a good part of the book.
But then Janie (and Jo and Madge) are like that - one more is never a
problem or a burden for her. And Nan fits in to the Lucy family very
well (although, to some extent she is utilised as Mother's Help in the
same way that Beth and Maria are by Joey - although it's not formalised
in this instance).
The Beth thing. Well, it's a plot device, obviously. But I can just
about see how a very proud couple, who are suddenly much worse off
(although not poor in any real sense) than the others of their circle,
are going to fiercely resent being patronised or treated as what seems
to them to be charity cases. So, becuase the education of the younger
children can be dressed up as sharing-a-governess or he's-my-god-son,
their pride isn't dented (much), but special arrangements would have
had to be made for Beth and Anne's pride can't stand it - that really
would be taking charity.
Unfair on Beth, of course. And hugely so. But I can see that Anne
in particular has got herself in a right state about it and just isn't
thinking straight. And Peter is burying his head in the sand about the
whole thing and hoping it will go away (of course, he is presumably
worried sick about money, and just working all the hours trying to keep
up his practice and stop things getting worse...).
I wonder if Anne has post-natal depression after Barbara's birth? And
maybe there is an element of delayed grief after the death of their son
- Piers, is it? Whatever, Anne seems to be on the brink of a breakdown
quite a lot of the time, and unfortunately, Beth ends up suffering the
most. In the circumstances, I think Janie does really well to handle it
in the way that she does, and thank goodness for the Chalet School -
that's what I say!
Nan and David - well, it is a bit quick, but at least EBD has them
meet before forming an attachment, unlike Maidie Willoughby and her
Northern Saint
. So, in the context of GO-book relationships it seems remarkably
sensible. And it makes for a nice happy ending for Nan, completing her
Journey...
#5: Author: Mrs Redboots, Location: London, UKPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:15 pm — I loved the scene with Bill on the boat.
But I found the children rather unrealistic, although I suppose in
the era before television and nursery-school, they did think up awful
things to do! And the scene that grates on modern ears is when one of
them (John, I think) gets spanked, and he can't believe that Daddy
could hurt him so badly on purpose. Nor, I am sure, could any modern parent! But EBD seems to think that other consequences don't do the trick.
#6: Author: Jennie, Location: CambridgeshirePosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:49 pm — I think Janie comes out of this rather well. For
a start, she is the one to tackle Anne about Beth's problems, even
though she knows that Anne will be offended.
She also tackles Nan's grief for her mother, knowing that it is a very
sore point with Nan, but no-one else had the common-sense to do it.
And finally, when Nan is contemplating getting engaged to David
Willoughby, Janie is very firm that Nan should meet and get to know
David properly and meet and get to know other young men before she
makes an irrevocable decision about her future.
Even though Janie is seen as part-child-part woman in this, she is
still very sensible and thoughtful. She makes a good contrast with her
sisters as Elizabeth is rather lazy about disciplining her family, and
Anne is too rigid to see that she is harming Beth with her attitude.