The CBB
http://www.the-cbb.co.uk/

Women: When Staff Go Bad
http://www.the-cbb.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5856

Author:  Róisín [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Women: When Staff Go Bad

(You can add your own mood music to the end of that title! :lol:)

In general the Chalet Staff are a competent, likeable group, but there are a few teachers who are just plain bad, or who have trouble coping – Matrons Besley and Webb, Miss Bubb, Miss Norman and Miss Ashley in particular. Do you think these teachers were unjustly villified, or were they really that bad?

Please join in the discussion below :D

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Miss Norman is the only example I can think of of a teacher who actually struggled to do the job.

The others just didn't fit into the CS culture. From personal experience :cry: I know that it's really difficult when you end up working somewhere that you feel is not very well run, but, unfortunately, when you're an employee - and that applies to some extent even if you're employed in a very senior position such as that of a headmistress - you have to go with the rules that apply. If you don't, there are going to be problems.

It may well mean that there's something wrong with the workplace rather than that there's something wrong with you - I have considerable sympathy with Miss Bubb's wish to put more emphasis on academic success, and could scream at some of the comments about new members of staff needing to understand the school's little ways! - but unless you're specifically brought in to change things then you have to work within the framework that's there.

Author:  Liz K [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Miss Slater too? Not being too happy with the languages, wanting to run things more to her own liking.

Author:  JayB [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think Matron Besley and Miss Ashley were just inexperienced and lacking in good sense. I don't suppose either of them would ever have been the best at what they did, but in a few years they'd have been a lot better.

I think Matron Webb was the biggest out and out villain. She might have had some justification for thinking that Madge was too inexperienced and needed guidance, but her methods were really unacceptable. These days she'd have been sacked a lot earlier.

Author:  Loryat [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think Miss Slater gets a raw deal. To beign with she's portrayed as jolly and well liked if too toung to take over the Headship - then by Barbara she's turned into someone widely detested. Unless she undergoes a visible personality change in Changes I think EBD just made a victim of her so that Nancy Wilmot would shine even more brightly by comparison.

What about the temperamental music and art teachers? Herrs Laubach and Anserl, Grizel, even Plato? Maybe it was seen as more acceptable in a man or an 'arty' type?

I think Matron Webb's the worst but Miss Bubb is pretty callous when she refuses Gay homeleave when her brother's going to fight in the war.

Author:  Liss [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Loryat wrote:
I think Miss Slater gets a raw deal. To beign with she's portrayed as jolly and well liked if too toung to take over the Headship - then by Barbara she's turned into someone widely detested. Unless she undergoes a visible personality change in Changes I think EBD just made a victim of her so that Nancy Wilmot would shine even more brightly by comparison.


The impression I always got with Miss Slater was that that she never really fit into the cozy old-girls-come-back-to-teach big-happy-family way of the school, which wasn't so bad when it was a more "normal" boarding school in England, but became more difficult when the school moved to Switzerland and became increasingly isolated from anything but its own small community on the Platz. I can see that those circumstances would have driven a more independent-minded woman to distraction!!

Author:  Sunglass [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

The case I always think of ('potentially incompetent' rather than 'bad') although I do think it's significant we only hear about it second-hand and briefly, is that of Margot Venables when she becomes Matron (is she in St Clare's?) We hear that she's doing fine with the girls, and has them 'well in hand' because she's 'tactful' (?) - but to be honest, I've always found it hard to believe. And so, I think, did EBD, because we never see her in action.

She's a tiny, fragile, helpless woman who probably has some form of PSTD after her awful experiences, and who dies of decline not many years later, having managed to survive as long as she has for the sake of her young daughters. Given the hugely reponsible all-round disciplinary, medical and domestic role of a CS matron, how could she possibly manage it, even from a physical stamina point of view, and even without factoring in the naughty Middles who were her main charges? (It's extraordinary she ever took the job, but that's another topic...)

I find myself wondering whether Margot would have been un-fireable, however poorly she managed, because of being Founding Family. Or whether the girls, even the Middles, knew that here was someone they simply weren't allowed to play up to? I sometimes imagine the mistresses or prefects being firmly instructed about hovering about her to pre-empt trouble, or even the girls getting a special lecture about behaving for her...? Although I suppose it's possible that even Middles might simply have felt sorry for her and behaved - I went to a really rough school, which found it almost impossible to recruit sub teachers, but there was one terrified young student teacher even my class almost never tormented, because she was visibly shaking and mild outbreaks of disorder brought her to the verge of tears, and even the ringleaders let her alone after one or two incidents.

Author:  Emma A [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think that Miss Slater's reasons for leaving the school are quite valid - she wants some responsibility, some career progression, and dislikes the idea of teaching in German, particularly. She just doesn't fit too well in the Swiss books. But I do think that her treatment by her fellow staff seems strange, in that they seem not to recognise that the school is not the perfect workplace for everyone, and that her leaving the place is seen as a sort of betrayal: leaving to get married would have been an acceptable reason, whereas leaving to further one's career is beyond the pale! I imagine her to be a good teacher, who gets disillusioned by the ethos of the school against maths - she likes Phil Craven, for example, who is the only character allowed to be good at maths, but who is generally an objectionable girl (at least to the other staff and the "good" girls). It's amazing any maths teacher stayed long at the Chalet School, given the daily discouragement they must have received - hardly anyone is said to be good at the subject, and many actively loathe it!

Apart from Miss Slater (who seems to be alone in regarding teaching as a career rather than as a vocation, or something to do before marriage), and Miss Bubb, most of the teachers seem not to have any ambition, and are very happy with the positions they have at the school, and apart from Miss Norman, I don't remember anyone else actually being anything other than utterly confident and "a born teacher".

Miss Annersley in particular must have had a genius for hiring staff who would be good teachers but without any grain of ambition or personality quirks. Are the faults ascribed to Joan Bertram purely a result of drabbles, or did EBD write her as being slightly abrasive?

Author:  Nightwing [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

The treatment of Matron Besley interests me particularly - unlike Matron Webb, she's treated fairly sympathetically. We're told she lacks somewhat in self-confidence and experience, and although Jo takes a dislike to her, she (Jo, I mean) is not shown to be completely in the right about it. Yet despite all that, at the end of the day Matron Besley has to leave - because she's frightened of thunderstorms! While I understand that the school needs a matron that isn't incapacitated whenever there's bad weather, I'm not sure why she's shown as a victim if she's not going to stick around. Matron Webb and Miss Bubb, are both shown to be entirely at fault, and leave; Miss Norman is shown sympathetically, and stays. Matron Besley is shown somewhere between the two and reading about her always makes me feel uncomfortable since I'm not quite sure where EBD is going with her.

Author:  Lesley [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think, of all those mentioned, there is only one member of staff that is truly bad - Matron Webb. For the others you have inexperience - Matron Besley and Miss Norman, and vaunting ambition and lack of tact - Miss Bubb and Miss Ashley.

Matron Webb is the one who has behaved very badly and attempted to over-ride the actual authority within the school.

I agree with the comments about the overall standards of the teachers being very high - but then we rarely see much in the way of discord within the staffroom - so much so that the few episodes that are seen stand out - one being Pam Slater when she announces she'll not be going to Switzerland and another when I think Hilary Burn or Peggy Burnett annoy an older member of staff who can remember her as a Middle.

BTW I am very impressed with Joey during the Pam Slater-baiting episode - she's the one that stops the teasing from the other mistresses.

Author:  Selena [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I feel sorry for Miss Slater. Probably partly because my favourite subject at school was maths, partly because nearly everyone at the Chalet School seems to be really bad at her subject and partly because i thought the other mistresses in Changes were really quite horrible to her when she said she was leaving. It was like they thought she'd got a bit above herself because she had some ambition, and did not want to spend her life as an assistant mistress.

I thought Miss Bubb was awful! Unimaginative, as she just kept sending them to bed as a punishment, like they were about 5 years old, and a bit sadistic. She actively seemed to enjoy refusing the fifths' deputation, and was quite rude to Daisy. Her behaviour to Gay, not allowing her to go and see her brother, was spiteful. I really wish Grandma Learoyd had got the opportunity to speak to her in person....lays down bunny food :wink:

Author:  JB [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Lesley wrote:

Quote:
BTW I am very impressed with Joey during the Pam Slater-baiting episode - she's the one that stops the teasing from the other mistresses.


I was just about to say the same thing.

There's an episode of discord in the staff room between Biddy O'Ryan and Pam Slater because the latter struggles with German days and Biddy says she needs to holiday in Austria. I think Pam remembers Biddy as a middle.

I would have liked to see Miss Ashley's interaction with the other staff, as I don't remember any staff room conversations in this book.

The Chalet School is incredibly lucky with its staff - not only do they have to be tri-lingual, they have to fit into a very restricted life in Switzerland and you'd expect there to be more tension.

One of the things I like about the Plas Howell books is that we see/hear more about the staff when they're off duty - Gillian Linton even gets to go on dates with Peter Young.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Just as a slight aside, I think that what happens with Matron Webb is very realistic - both from a 1930s viewpoint and from a modern viewpoint - from Madge's side. An unnamed matron whom we never meet leaves suddenly. Madge is trying to deal with running the school - which at that time is expanding rapidly - and is also looking after Joey, Juliet and Robin and (presumably!) trying to find some time to spend with Jem. She just physically hasn't got the time to go to Britain (bearing in mind that at this point in the school's life it really has to have an English-speaking matron), so she has to take on someone whom she hasn't interviewed personally, and she ends up stuck with someone who just doesn't fit in at all and very rapidly puts everyone's backs up.

It's a very realistic example of how, will the best will in the world, things can end up going pear-shaped when you've got too much to do and not enough time to do it in and are therefore forced to take a short cut. In the Swiss years we don't really see problems with the running of the school, but I think that Madge's experience here, and also the bit in School At when we see her worrying about whether or not to build an extension, are more ... I do wish I could think of a decent synonym for realistic! True-to-life? And, without wanting to wish problems on to people, in a way that's kind of nice ...

Author:  MJKB [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
Just as a slight aside, I think that what happens with Matron Webb is very realistic - both from a 1930s viewpoint and from a modern viewpoint - from Madge's side. An unnamed matron whom we never meet leaves suddenly. Madge is trying to deal with running the school - which at that time is expanding rapidly - and is also looking after Joey, Juliet and Robin and (presumably!) trying to find some time to spend with Jem. She just physically hasn't got the time to go to Britain (bearing in mind that at this point in the school's life it really has to have an English-speaking matron), so she has to take on someone whom she hasn't interviewed personally, and she ends up stuck with someone who just doesn't fit in at all and very rapidly puts everyone's backs up.

It just struck me how easy it was for Madge in the end to sack Matron Webb, not that she didn't deserve it. Nowadays it is practically impossible to get rid of a bad teacher, especially if they have any years of service. I know it's not quite the same thing, bbecause Matron Webb was only employed a very short time, but I bet if she was around now she'd get a few quid for unfair dismissal.

Author:  MaryR [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Peggy Burnett and, I think, Rosemary Charlesworth, get across each other at one point over someone being kept back by Peggy, and they give each other the silent treatment. Hilda notices but decides to leave them to fight it out between them. (Can't remember which book.)

And as for Ivy Norman, it's not that she's incompetent, it's just that she isn't used to the older ones, preferring to teach Juniors. I can understand that as I too only wanted to teach 11 year olds and under. It's a whole different ball game to take the older ones. It was said that she was excellent with the little ones and that they loved her - so not incompetent at all.

Author:  JayB [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Quote:
Matron Webb was only employed a very short time, but I bet if she was around now she'd get a few quid for unfair dismissal.

I don't know - she locked up one pupil and manhandled another - these days she (or the school) would probably be sued for assault.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

It would certainly make an interesting industrial tribunal ...

Maybe the lack of job security at the time was another reason why there were not that many incidences of staff disagreeing with school policy, especially as I can't imagine any of the CS mistresses belonged to a union. As happened to Matron Webb, someone considered unsatisfactory could just be dismissed and would probably have had to consider themselves lucky if they were paid off until the end of term and got a reasonable reference.

There's no suggestion that any of the mistresses ever felt uncomfortable or insecure - I only wish I worked in a place where the atmosphere was as good as it seems to've been there and the "office politics" seem to've been minimal - but at the same time they must have felt that it would be inadvisable to "rock the boat" (apologies for poor English!) too much. Living under the same roof in a restricted environment must have added to that: it wasn't as if someone could just stomp off after a clash with a colleague knowing that they wouldn't see them again until the next morning by which time they'd both have had plenty of time to calm down, so maybe that made people more inclined to bite their tongues than they would have been otherwise.

Author:  jennifer [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

It is an interesting point about ambition - being professionally ambitious is seen almost as slightly dirty. Miss Slater is ridiculed for wanted to move up to head of a department with a strong say in curriculum, and Miss Bubb, the other ambitious mistress, is shown as hard and unfeeling. The mistresses are expected to enjoy the teaching part, but not really be interested in moving up in position, or introducing changes.

I think Miss Bubb crossed the line later in her short tenure, but most of the issues were those of a square peg in a roud hole - she'd have probably done fine in a day school with a high academic standard, firm discipline, and no special health requirements, but couldn't handle the unique CS ethos.

Matron Besley was given a hard job. She's young and inexperienced, but is given the most difficult group of girls to handle, in a house away from the main school. She has Joey to handle, who has a great deal of influence with the younger girls, and who has taken an immediate dislike to her. She's still a twit, but the situation wasn't all her fault.

It is interesting about the male teachers - they are allowed to have volatile tempers and be pretty mean to the students. Herr Anserl is restricted to advanced students, but Herr Laubach teaches all the art classes, and it sounds like he can make them pretty miserable for the girls.

I'd add Grizel to the list - she's seen as competent, but not very likeable, ruling through fear rather than respect.

Author:  Alison H [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

That's a really interesting point about the male teachers. Even Mr Denny loses his temper on occasion, and Herr Laubach in particular is, as you say, very volatile. I can't imagine one of the female teachers being allowed to get away with that without a severe reprimand from Madge or Hilda.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I actually think Miss Bubb was incompetent in a way. She may have been an excellent teacher but a terrible Head as she always drew the reins so tightly. I think what adds to the argument of her not being particularly good isn't just her time at the Chalet School but also the fact her own school was a flop afterwards.

Author:  Selena [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Fiona Mc wrote:
I actually think Miss Bubb was incompetent in a way. She may have been an excellent teacher but a terrible Head as she always drew the reins so tightly. I think what adds to the argument of her not being particularly good isn't just her time at the Chalet School but also the fact her own school was a flop afterwards.


Miss Bubb hadn't been a head teacher before though, had she? I think she had been an assistant teacher and then just tried to copy what her previous Head had done when she came to the CS.

She may have thought that the way her previous school was run was the only correct way to do things and i believe she genuinely thought the CS was too lax in some ways. The girls did seem to have a fair amount of freedom and the prefects were very responsible.

Author:  MaryR [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
Maybe the lack of job security at the time was another reason why there were not that many incidences of staff disagreeing with school policy, especially as I can't imagine any of the CS mistresses belonged to a union.

There were plenty of jobs around in the fifties for teachers, so I don't think that would have been an issue if they seriously had problems with the ethos of the school. Pam Slater knew this and it didn't stop her. And after all, staff meetings are there for people to bring up any disagreements they might have.

Alison H wrote:
There's no suggestion that any of the mistresses ever felt uncomfortable or insecure - I only wish I worked in a place where the atmosphere was as good as it seems to've been there and the "office politics" seem to've been minimal.

I worked in just such a place - twice. The second time it happened I thought I had died and gone to heaven, as the staff were so welcoming and lovely - and that never changed. I felt free to be me. I felt I mattered, which doesn't happen in all schools, believe me. So I have no problem with the CS atmosphere as portrayed.

Alison H wrote:
Living under the same roof in a restricted environment must have added to that: it wasn't as if someone could just stomp off after a clash with a colleague knowing that they wouldn't see them again until the next morning by which time they'd both have had plenty of time to calm down, so maybe that made people more inclined to bite their tongues than they would have been otherwise.

Maybe that's something we all need to learn. :D But as I said earlier, there were spats, as that one between Peggy and Rosemary, and someone mentioned the one between Biddy and Pam, but they can still stomp off, either for a walk or go and be with someone else, whatever. And it's not far to Interlaken or other places if they really want to get away. After all, no one can be sweet as pie all the time. :twisted:

Sorry, I seem to have got carried away. :bawling:

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

People are saying that Pam Slater was ridiculed for leaving the CS. I don't remember that. I do remember the little 'misunderstanding' between herself and Biddy re the German,- funny thing is, I could understand why Pam was a tad cold towards one time pupil for the advice, however kindly it was meant. With regard to her decision not to go to Switzerland with the school was there that much negative comment or feelings of resentment towards her from anyone. Am I missing some episode in a book?

Re Miss Ashley, I couldnt standher. Having made that crass statement about Herr Arsnel and seeing the reaction of Peggy, the least she could have done was apologis

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

People are saying that Pam Slater was ridiculed for leaving the CS. I don't remember that. I do remember the little 'misunderstanding' between herself and Biddy re the German,- funny thing is, I could understand why Pam was a tad cold towards one time pupil for the advice, however kindly it was meant. With regard to her decision not to go to Switzerland with the school was there that much negative comment or feelings of resentment towards her from anyone. Am I missing some episode in a book?

Re Miss Ashley, I couldnt standher. Having made that crass statement about Herr Arsnel and seeing the reaction of Peggy, the least she could have done was apologise,

Author:  Selena [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

MJKB wrote:
People are saying that Pam Slater was ridiculed for leaving the CS. I don't remember that. I do remember the little 'misunderstanding' between herself and Biddy re the German,- funny thing is, I could understand why Pam was a tad cold towards one time pupil for the advice, however kindly it was meant. With regard to her decision not to go to Switzerland with the school was there that much negative comment or feelings of resentment towards her from anyone. Am I missing some episode in a book?


Pam Slater is ridiculed in Changes for the Chalet School in chapter 11, Joey Brings News. She has just told some other mistresses she isn't coming to Switzerland and they are full of disbelief.

I think her reasons for not going are understandable - she doesn't like foreign languages and she wants promotion. I don't understand why Rosalie Dene says Miss Slater is "silly" for not wanting to speak foreign languages all day when she doesn't enjoy them.

I think it's Miss Slater mentioning that she won't be "just" an assistant mistress in her new job that really triggers them off. After all, they are apparently all quite happy to be assistant mistresses and are not after promotion.

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Pam Slater says that she isn't moving to Switzerland, and Ruth Derwent expresses surprise. Pam says that she doesn't like the idea of having to speak French and German all the time. It's a perfectly reasonable remark - how would most people feel if they were suddenly told that from now on they'd have to do their job in three languages - but Rosalie Dene - who's not usually outspoken or tactless :shock: - says:

Quote:
"You funk! Fancy missing the mountains and lakes for a silly reason like that! Oh, Slater, you are an idiot!"


Pam - quite understandably! - is very offended, and says:

Quote:
"Thanks for the bouquet! ... Where I'm going, I shall be head of the maths department and can run it to suit myself and that'll be a change of all these years of just being an assistant mistress!"


Biddy O'Ryan (who, to be fair, had been spoken to quite rudely by Pam Slater earlier in the book, when Pam said something about her having no more sense then than she'd had when she'd been a pupil), then says:

Quote:
"I say, you people, do you think we ought to be lounging around like this in the presence of anyone so important?"


and she, Peggy Burnett and Ruth Derwent all kneel on the floor making sarcastic remarks about how they were only humble assistants rather than heads of department.

I can understand them not liking the "just an assistant mistress" remark, but they were all younger than she was and couldn't really have expected to be heads of department, and she was only abrupt in the first place because Rosalie was so rude to her. No-one congratulated her on her new job or even just said that they hoped she'd be very happy there.

I can't think of any other occasion on which Rosalie is even remotely offhand with anyone :roll: .

Author:  jennifer [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

And when Miss Slater was hired, the school was primarily English - very little emphasis on German during the war, and no trilingual teaching. It sounds like her German was high school level - I have high school level French and a strong math background, and I would have a horrible time teaching the subject in French. For one thing, I don't know any of the technical terms, as they aren't covered in your typical French class.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

But then she's been speaking 3 languages for at least 3 years and if she really hated it, why didn't she leave earlier? I could understand Rosalie being surprised into being a little bit tactless about it when it does come as a bolt out of the blue. I never saw the other three as being particularly nasty mainly cos it seems like they're teasing her more than trying to hurt her especially after her comment about being an assistant. I think understandably Biddy, Peggy and Ruth are all young enough in their jobs to not understand the need to be promoted, the way Pam wants to be. And Peggy for a start, is more or less in charge of Games being the only Games Mistress there.

Author:  JB [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

In 'Carola', we're told that Pam didn't mind the French days but she struggles with German. When Miss Annersley announces an extra German day, she's no more pleased than her pupils.

The move to Switzerland would be an obvious time for her to think about her future and perhaps the opportunity of being head of department hadn't come up before.

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:

Post subject: Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad Reply with quote
Pam Slater says that she isn't moving to Switzerland, and Ruth Derwent expresses surprise. Pam says that she doesn't like the idea of having to speak French and German all the time. It's a perfectly reasonable remark - how would most people feel if they were suddenly told that from now on they'd have to do their job in three languages - but Rosalie Dene - who's not usually outspoken or tactless :shock: - says:

Quote:
"You funk! Fancy missing the mountains and lakes for a silly reason like that! Oh, Slater, you are an idiot!"


The reaction to Pam's leaving is alot sharper than I thought, near enough the reaction to the news in the 1960s a nun could expect leaving the convent. I guess the other mistresses were so looking forward to the excitement of the move to Switerland, at that point they couldn't have known exactly how isolated and confining it is, that they felt Pam's defection took something of the gloss away from the whole project.

Author:  Sunglass [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I'm another who finds the rudeness of response to Miss Slater's announcement rather startling - it seems out of character for those involved, apart from anything else, and rather like schoolgirls exerting peer pressure on someone standing out from the group. It says quite a lot about EBD's highly glossy portrayal of what it's like to work for the CS - she would clearly see as negative a staffroom which had any kind of turnover of mistresses passing through for a few years and leaving for a more senior position, or for other reasons! Marriage is the only acceptable reason to leave.

It sticks in my throat a bit that Miss Slater is required to give multiple reasons for leaving - not liking languages, the seniority of her new job, etc - when I think most adults, on discovering a colleague was about to leave our workplace, would not require to be told why, and then rain scorn upon the reasons given! It really is quite an odd moment in the series, where CS staff appear to lose all their habitual good manners... I have quite a lot of sympathy with Miss Slater here, and I think that if she was meditating a move, this was the best (as well as the most natural) time for one - I could see the fun of teaching on a beautiful little island, with a decent ferry service to the mainland, but the Gornetz Platz gets very claustrophobic after a few novels...

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Some of the people I worked with were quite shocked when I left my old job after 7 years, and Miss Slater's departure was at a time when working at the same place all your working life was quite common.

There was certainly no need for the rudeness, though, and could no-one have managed to wish her well? It's not as if she said she was leaving because she didn't like the CS - I did French and Spanish for GCSE but certainly couldn't do my job in them, and surely wanting a promotion isn't unreasonable - but the impression given is that the only acceptable reasons for leaving are marriage, illness (in Mlle Lepattre's case) or being "needed at home".

Some people do seem to find it very hard to accept that people want to leave their workplace, though. When a colleague of mine got a new job last year, after getting only one pay rise in three years and being spoken to very unpleasantly on a day-to-day basis by her rude boss, I was delighted for her but some of the longer-serving members of staff were genuinely stunned that she'd decided to go :? .

Author:  Tara [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

The other point about the Pam Slater episode is that, in fairness to EBD, her decision is totally vindicated later in the series when we see her (can't remember which book - someone willl know!) happily settled in a senior position (I think she was Head?) with no hankerings at all for the CS.
I agree that the reaction we've just been discussing is very over the top, but, although we're well past the 'family' school by this point in the series, there is always a sense in which the CS does operate as a family, as does any good school. Last summer I unexpectedly met one of my own school teachers and was stunned to learn, as we talked, that she had left 'our' school because she couldn't get any A Level teaching (because everyone stayed for ever). It did feel very strangely like a betrayal! Weird.
I, like Mary, was very fortunate in spending the last fifteen years of my teaching life in a splendid (secondary, in my case) school and, although staff did leave, of course, it always felt like losing a family member, so it's not completely unrealistic.
One more point re. Matron Besly - she was condemned, I feel, not because she was afraid of thunderstorms, but because she let that fear render her totally incapable of being there to support and comfort the girls.
And isn't it interesting that the male staff are allowed all sorts of idiosyncracies and really quite unreasonable and unpredictable behaviour at times - as, I suppose, is Grizel, in her way, though her circs are explained.

Author:  JayB [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Quote:
And isn't it interesting that the male staff are allowed all sorts of idiosyncracies and really quite unreasonable and unpredictable behaviour at times - as, I suppose, is Grizel, in her way, though her circs are explained.

But they are all very effective teachers; it would have been hard to find another singing teacher who was up to Mr Denny's standards, for example. And other than Grizel, they were all visiting masters and their eccentricities didn't affect the day to day running of the school. Whereas Matron Besly, as you pointed out, couldn't do the most basic parts of her job. And she could easily be replaced.

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Maybe the male teachers' weird behaviour is excused on the grounds that they're "artistic" - male teachers only seem to be allowed if they teach either art or music.

Author:  Maeve [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Someone whom we read a lot about, although she isn't at the CS, is St Scholastica's, Miss Browne. I've always had mixed feelings about her. She's not drawn in a totally unsympathetic manner -- I never think we're suppose to find her as bad as Miss Bubb, say -- but she does seem very stiff in her manner compared to both Madge and Mddle LePattre and, of course, shows poor judgment in how she interacts with Elaine and her decision about Guides.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

That's a really good point. We aren't told much about Miss Browne, but it sounds as if a) she doesn't really want to be running a school but needs the money and can't think of any better alternative ways to earn a living and b) she doesn't have the necessary strength of character to be a headmistress. Unfortunately there must have been a lot of people like her at small schools in the early decades of the 20th century.

I think that to some extent, Mlle Lepattre is the same. She is a lovely person and very popular with all the girls, and there's nothing to suggest that she isn't good at teaching French, but I don't think that she was strong enough to be headmistress. I would think that EBD realised that Mlle wouldn't be able to cope once the school got larger and Madge's time was increasingly taken up by her family and that that's why she replaced her with Hilda - although I wish she'd let Mlle inherit enough money to retire on, like Miss Browne did, instead of making her get ill :cry: .

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
Maybe the male teachers' weird behaviour is excused on the grounds that they're "artistic" - male teachers only seem to be allowed if they teach either art or music.


I'd extend the double standard to male teachers' appearance, compared to the trig looks of the female staff - with the CS apparently priding itself on its well-turned-out staff, imagine a female equivalent to Tristan Denny's eccentric hair style (and am I right in thinking he has at some stage a sort of Elizabethan beard too?), faintly effeminate complexion and 'artistic' clothes! Presumably they'd never have hired the female equivalent (especially given the disdain for Mrs Pertwee's appearance), but I'm amusing myself by imagining Matey or the other mistressees dropping heavy hints about hair-brushing and earphones, and knitting her 'trig' twinsets...

The portrayal of Miss Browne is interesting - I think EBD tends to relax her requirement for perfection in people who aren't actually CS, so that you can see some doubts and contradictions etc that she doesn't show in CS staff. I wonder whether Miss Browne isn't partly a vision of how the CS might have gone wrong in different hands - a foreign school that doesn't show up with the right cold-weather clothes or openness to Tirolean customs or foreign pupils, and which doesn't really thrive...?

Though I'm reminded of Miss Browne's tendency to confide too much in her head girl when Miss Annersley allows (I think) the triplets to discuss her replacement arrangement rather too freely...

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
That's a really good point. We aren't told much about Miss Browne, but it sounds as if a) she doesn't really want to be running a school but needs the money and can't think of any better alternative ways to earn a living and b) she doesn't have the necessary strength of character to be a headmistress. Unfortunately there must have been a lot of people like her at small schools in the early decades of the 20th century.


Just look at the Bronte sisters. From all I've heard about the, they would have been terrible to be taught by. None of the were particularly people persons, and struggled being at boarding school

Alison H wrote:
I think that to some extent, Mlle Lepattre is the same. She is a lovely person and very popular with all the girls, and there's nothing to suggest that she isn't good at teaching French, but I don't think that she was strong enough to be headmistress. I would think that EBD realised that Mlle wouldn't be able to cope once the school got larger and Madge's time was increasingly taken up by her family and that that's why she replaced her with Hilda - although I wish she'd let Mlle inherit enough money to retire on, like Miss Browne did, instead of making her get ill :cry: .


And yet it was such a good storyline. Some of the best scenes post Joey leaving involve Mademoiselle's illness. I think EBD handled it really well

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

And let's face it, Madge starts a school because she needs an income (and can't take Joey to India, as we might assume she'd have done otherwise, to act as Dick's housekeeper) - there's no pretence she's always been dying to teach, far less open a school. The CS, like many of the more short-lived schools opened by impecunious middle-class women with few or no qualifications, was first and foremost done for the money. It turns out to be a huge success, and Madge, despite lack of experience and qualifications, is an excellent teacher and headmistress - but this is partly EBD's fantasy, like Lucy Snowe's thriving school in Charlotte Bronte's Villette. She must have known perfectly well, even before she opened her own school, that for every CS there are dozens, if not hundreds of failed Bronte experiments, and for every Madge, lots of Miss Brownes.

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Fiona Mc wrote:
And yet it was such a good storyline. Some of the best scenes post Joey leaving involve Mademoiselle's illness. I think EBD handled it really well


So do I. I found Cornelia's grief over Mademoiselle very touching, although I'm not sure if there's that much evidence of their closeness prior to her illness.
I never get a very clear picture in my mind of Mademoiselle, I know she's described as plain in appearance but her personality isn't that strong, or is that just me?

Author:  Tor [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I have to admit my overwhelming feeling about her is 'amiable', and when I think of her I don't visualize a person but a kind of disembodied beatific smile (a la the cheshire cat!)....

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

In the Bettanys of Taverton, the writer (name doesn't spring to mind tho' I have the book and love it) makes her less one dimenensional without losing consistency with EBD's creation. If I imagine her at all I see a woman with brownish greyish hair, glasses, a slightly bewildered look and wearing a twin set and drindle skirt, oh, and louey(?) heals. I wonder why?

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I always see her as being quite strict, though amiable. I can quite easily see her reclining on a chair, fanning herself :lol:

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I always wondered what Mademoiselle privately made of Madge's marriage, after they'd thrown in their lots together to start the CS not so very long before. Of course, Madge was of prime marriagable age when they set up the school, and vibrant and attractive, but, the two of them were moving to lead a potentially fairly isolated and hard-working life in a remote foreign place with presumably relatively little chance of Madge meeting a suitable potential husband - might Mademoiselle have assumed Madge was unlikely to marry, and that sole responsibility for the day to running of the school would never fall on her? Might she have been quite disconcerted when Jem arrives on the scene, or was she always factoring it in as a possibility with a marriagable partner?

Because Madge leaving the day to day running of the school in the hands of someone who seems rather too gentle, not very keen on authority, and not in the pink of good health, could have meant the CS started to go downhill after its prosperous beginning. Obviously, it doesn't, but it's still a bit of a risk for a brand new school when its revered Head leaves, and before the CS 'brand' has had time to build up a real tradition or continuity by itself apart from Madge.

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Sunglass wrote:
I always wondered what Mademoiselle privately made of Madge's marriage, after they'd thrown in their lots together to start the CS not so very long before.

I often wondered about that too. Mademoiselle seems to be very happy about Madge's engagement and takes over relatively seemlessly and Madge and Jem always show her affection as well as respect. In the very early years Madge and her household play a major role in the stories so we don't actually miss her presence as Head. It's also clear that Mademoiselle still regards Madge as the 'real' head and herself as acting HM.
Slightly ot, but when I first started reading the CS, having been used to the treatment of the 'Mamselles' by EB, I was pleasantly surprised that Mademoiselle replaced Madge as HM as I half expected some English women to step into the position. It was a great stroke of internationalism for the time.
Again ot, has it been established that Mademoiselle at one point was Madge's governess? I always had that impression but I could be wrong.

Author:  Nightwing [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I've never really thought about it before, but you'd have to assume that there had been a fair amount of discussion between Madge and Elise-slash-Therese before Madge announces to Joey that she's getting married. Whatever Elise's private feelings are, it could hardly have come as a shock to her to hear that Jem had proposed and Madge had accepted, and I wonder if there had been any discussion between the two prior to that? There were several older, married women that Madge could have turned to for advice, but Elise is (I think) the only older working lady handy to get the other side of the story from.

ETA: As far as Miss Browne goes, I don't think the problem was that she confided too much in Elaine - after all, we see Madge confide in Joey on more than one occasion - so much as it was that she failed to realise that Elaine was twisting things in her own head to suit her own purposes.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I was thinking of it more in purely practical terms, and long before Jem came on the scene, really. Madge and Mademoiselle are business partners as well as friends, and as Mademoiselle has sunk all her capital into the CS, Madge's withdrawal from running the school on a daily basis will potentially have a big impact on her own life and on the success of the enterprise. I just wondered if Mademoiselle would have been likely to talk it through as a putative scenario before they left England - given the expectation that most women would marry, perhaps it wouldn't have been such an unexpected topic to bring up in a kind of 'Look, Marguerite - you're a beautiful young woman, cherie, and it's likely you'll have opportunities to marry. Can we talk about what that would mean for the business?' way.

Though I suppose Madge marrying someone with money might well have bolstered the CS finances if they needed it, even apart from the San bringing new pupils... It's more that one has the distinct impression that Mademoiselle would have been perfectly happy to continue taking needlework, French and piano, with someone else in charge.

Author:  JayB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I agree that Mdlle Lepattre had no particular wish to be Head. But when she was, she could be tough when she had to be. She dealt severely with Joyce & Co for their ragging of Miss Norman, and she expelled Thekla.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I always thought she was a good Head and was thrilled EBD had a non-Englishwoman as Head especially as it was meant to be such an international school, and after reading Mallory Towers and St Clare's, where the Frenchwomen are seen more as people to make fun of.

Therese LePattre may not have wanted to be Head but she was even more aware than Madge was that Madge wouldn't be able to keep visiting like Madge had hoped after Madge was married

Author:  Miss Di [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Sunglass wrote:
Madge and Mademoiselle are business partners as well as friends, and as Mademoiselle has sunk all her capital into the CS, Madge's withdrawal from running the school on a daily basis will potentially have a big impact on her own life and on the success of the enterprise.


But was Mademoiselle a business partner? Did she invest any capital in the start up? I always read her as an employee who wants no payment except the education of her niece, Simone.

Author:  jennifer [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I never really see Mlle Lepattre as head. Even after Madge leaves, it's still clear that it's Madge's school, and she has the final say.

She would have been a good balance for Madge in the early days. She was older and more experienced, and provided a chaperone of sorts, plus backup, for the younger, more dynamic Madge, who was the driving force. She strikes me as someone who would be a good, solid senior mistress, but not happy as the head.

Miss Browne is an interesting example - I see her as someone who is in over her head. She probably did all right in England, where things were familiar, but didn't have the mental flexibility or wisdom, or good judgement to manage in a new setting. I can't see her gaining the support of the local people, given her comments about foreigners. A large part of Madge's success in the early days was fueled by the way she made friends with the local families and business people, and had their advice and support.

Miss Browne also seemed to control details too tightly - she doesn't give the prefects much authority, and is very rigid about some things. However, she's not good at the big picture, or adapting her behaviour to match the results.

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think Madge and Mademoiselle made the perfect partnership in the first flush of the School. Madge was young, pretty, an excellent role model and a tough disciplinarian. Mademoiselle was middle aged, plain, motherly and quite lenient.

Author:  Abi [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

This is an interesting discussion for me because, like Fiona Mc, I always saw Mademoiselle as a really good head. She never had any discipline problems, but more than that, the girls loved her as much as they did Madge. When she became ill it was as though it was a beloved family member was ill - the entire school was personally concerned about her. It was obvious that she meant a huge amount to them.

I wonder whether maybe while Madge was head she tended to overshadow Mlle - after all, she was young, lively and pretty, whereas Mlle was older and not physically particularly attractive. But I guess Madge knew she was highly capable of taking her place and the fact that none of the girls commented on it being a weird decision shows that even before Madge left she must have been well-liked and respected.

Author:  Nightwing [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I don't think that Elise was a bad head, but I do think she failed to put her own mark on the position - she didn't have the same force of personality that Madge, Hilda, or even Nell did. I don't think that this was necessarily a bad thing, even - but it meant that she was carrying on the role that Madge had had, rather than forging a new path for the school. Of course, Madge's own continued interest in the school also contributed to this - whenever she came back to the school on a visit she'd step into her role as Head again!

Author:  Maeve [ Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Lesley wrote:
I agree with the comments about the overall standards of the teachers being very high - but then we rarely see much in the way of discord within the staffroom - so much so that the few episodes that are seen stand out - one being Pam Slater when she announces she'll not be going to Switzerland and another when I think Hilary Burn or Peggy Burnett annoy an older member of staff who can remember her as a Middle.


Another small example is from Althea. Althea is late for history because of Miss Burnett fitting her for some special shoes:
Quote:
In the staffroom there were repercussions. Miss Charlesworth meeting Miss Burnett in the doorway, demanded to be told why the latter had made Althea Glenyon late for history. Miss Burnett apologised somewhat flippantly.
“Was she late? Sorry, I’m sure, but it’s hard enough to fit everything in and I have to do things like fittings when I can. You can be thankful you don’t have extra bits and pieces in your day’s work as I do.”
“And you be thankful you don’t have to spend half your evenings correcting essays as I do!” Miss Charlesworth lashed back, before going on to deposit an armful of the said essays on her table and catch up another bundle waiting to be given back to Va before swinging out of the room, her nose in the air.
Altogether, Althea’s shoes were responsible for more than one unpleasant feeling.

Not a big deal in the ordinary scheme of things, but a bit unusual in the CS where people tend to shake down well together.

Edited to add: I've just read further to where Miss Annnersley says:
Quote:
“ Why were you late, Althea?”
“Miss Burnett was fitting me with new game shoes,” Althea mumbled.
“Yes. Then that is explained.” It also explained to the Head why the two mistresses had seemed to be so chilly to each other during Mittagessen. She knew Miss Charlesworth’s idiosyncrasy and also Peggy Burnett’s casual ways. Well, that was something the two must get over between themselves, thank goodness!

Never seriously taught myself, so not sure how I'd take that if I was a teacher -- any teachers out there want to comment? Is this hands off attitude of Hilda's good or bad?

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I'm with Miss Charlesworth there - Peggy shouldn't have made Althea late for another lesson unless it was because of something urgent. I can't say I ever had to be fitted for special shoes at school, but our PE teacher seemed to take the attitude that she was entitled to as much lesson time as anyone else and to ignore the fact that we needed time to get out of our PE kits and back into our uniforms before the next lesson, so we'd always end up being late for whatever came after PE, and I'm sure it put other teachers' backs up.

I don't think that being annoyed that another mistress has cause disruption to your lesson is "idiosyncratic", and Peggy could just have apologised and said that she'd had a very busy day without making that crack about how she had to do so much more than anyone else.

As for Hilda, I suppose she's in the same awkward position as any other boss is when two staff members have had a disagreement - sometimes these things can blow over very quickly, but sometimes they can escalate in which case it might've been better to've intervened earlier on, but it's hard to know which way any one case is going to go. The "thank goodness" comment is interesting, though ...

Author:  Emma A [ Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
As for Hilda, I suppose she's in the same awkward position as any other boss is when two staff members have had a disagreement - sometimes these things can blow over very quickly, but sometimes they can escalate in which case it might've been better to've intervened earlier on, but it's hard to know which way any one case is going to go. The "thank goodness" comment is interesting, though ...

It rather suggests that Hilda had been thinking that it was something rather more serious, that perhaps she might have to set about solving herself, but if it was just that Miss Burnett had made Althea late, then that was not something she needed to get involved with.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
I'm with Miss Charlesworth there - Peggy shouldn't have made Althea late for another lesson unless it was because of something urgent.


I agree, only it must have been more difficult to enforce this kind of thing at the CS, where lessons so often look to be pretty expendable in the face of rambles, winter sports, trips down to Lake Thun, discussions of how to celebrate a CS anniversary, or readings of the latest Nativity Play! I know that every time some new girl remarks on this, her sheepdog replies that they make up for the lost time in bad weather - but do we ever actually see a situation where someone says 'OK, it's snowing, so extra lessons all round'? When you add in Matey continually pulling people out of class to tidy their drawers, the triplets being taken out of class to see Joey in the study, or to go home to babysit in Joey's absence, and all the remedial sessions we hear about, I can imagine a situation arising where staff might think it was a minor breach of etiquette to make a girl late...

Author:  Alison H [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

:lol: When you see it all put down together like that, it's no wonder that people like Miss Charlesworth and Miss Slater, who weren't Old Girls who'd never known any different, got fed up! I would have been furious, either as a mistress or a pupil-victim, about Matey dragging people out of lessons to tidy their drawers.

I'm never sure if she was one of these people who think that anything they want doing is automatically more important than absolutely anything else, had some sort of obsessive compulsive disorder about the girls' cubicles being tidy, or was just trying to make her presence felt as some sort of power trip because she felt that a matron might be seen as being less important than a teacher!

Author:  Nightwing [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
...or was just trying to make her presence felt as some sort of power trip because she felt that a matron might be seen as being less important than a teacher!


You might actually be onto something there! Experience tells me that support staff are often treated quite badly by teaching staff at schools. That's not a criticism of our many teachers on the board, by the way! But it's definitely not unusual for many teachers not to realise that other members of staff - administrators, cleaners, librarians, health staff and so on - are needed for schools to actually work. I could see the various matrons disrupting classes as a petty way at getting back at teachers for not giving them the respect they deserve!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Quote:
I could see the various matrons disrupting classes as a petty way at getting back at teachers for not giving them the respect they deserve!


I would love to see someone try and be disresepctful to Matey :lol:

Author:  JayB [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Quote:
I would love to see someone try and be disresepctful to Matey


I'd like to see a drabble in which a staff member finally stands up to Matey and refuses to drink the hot milk or jump into the hot bath or to allow girls to leave her classes to tidy their cubicles. (Does Matey do that when it's Hilda or Nell teaching, I wonder?)

Presumably courtesy demands that the request is made to the mistress in charge - 'Please Miss Wilmot, Matron says will Jack Lambert go and tidy her cubicle.' What would happen if Miss Wilmot refused? Or does Matey just ask for the girl to be sent to her without specifying a reason, so the mistress can't refuse in case it is something urgent?

Author:  Tor [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I wonder if there is any bartering with/bribing of Rosalie to get your lessons scheduled for just before or after mittagessen, as these seem the least likely to suffer from interruptions from Matey/cancellation for walks/play practice/skiing etc.

Author:  Cat C [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Sunglass wrote:
... but do we ever actually see a situation where someone says 'OK, it's snowing, so extra lessons all round'?


We see it a little bit, when they're on the Island, and Jo gets stuck there and insists that the sixth form (I think) spend their free time having extra history lessons with her. And we certainly have various times when the girls are said to be suffering from the effects of being cooped up, and lacking exercise. It's not quite the obverse of 'afternoon lessons are cancelled because we're all going skiing instead' - but then writing/reading about extra lessons probably wouldn't be as interesting as writing about skiing, or other fun, outdoor activities.

Author:  hac61 [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
I would have been furious, either as a mistress or a pupil-victim, about Matey dragging people out of lessons to tidy their drawers.


I always took it that if you were called out of lessons to tidy your drawers then you were in twice as much trouble: trouble with Matey and trouble with the member of staff whose lesson you had missed!

I think tidyness is a virtue that makes everyday life much easier, not that I practise what I preach. I frequently spend ages looking all over the house for something only to find that I have, actually, in a fit of some kind, put it away in the place it's suppose to be!

(And I insist on the characters in my school stories being very tidy in the bedrooms too.) :lol:

Author:  Selena [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Do any of the girls take advantage of being pulled out of lessons?

I can't remember there being any instances of, say, someone has a lesson they hate in the morning, such as maths or a french verb test, and so she deliberately leaves her cubicle really messy so she gets called out of the hated lesson to tidy it up.... :twisted:

I'm sure i could stretch out tidying up to last for most of a lesson if i tried! :lol:

Author:  JB [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison wrote:

Quote:
I would have been furious, either as a mistress or a pupil-victim, about Matey dragging people out of lessons to tidy their drawers.


I don't remember thinking about this when I was a child but when I reread now, I find it hard to believe. The untidy pupil may get in trouble twice but it's so very thoughtless and direspectful towards the mistress taking the lesson.

I would have thought it was as effective (if not more so) for the pupil to lose some of their free time.

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Sunglass wrote:
Alison H wrote:
I'm with Miss Charlesworth there - Peggy shouldn't have made Althea late for another lesson unless it was because of something urgent.


I think there's fault on both sides here. Miss Charlesworth approaches Peggy quite aggressively, and Peggy's reply is a bit off hand. There is also the fact that Peggy is senior to Miss C by virtue of her years of service to the School.

Author:  Nightwing [ Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

JB wrote:
I would have thought it was as effective (if not more so) for the pupil to lose some of their free time.


I agree! I think we just have to put this down as plot contrivance for the most part, the same as Joey being allowed to pull her daughters out of lessons - in reality, I'm sure Joey would be able to wait until break, and I'm sure Matron would be more than happy to fill up the girls' free time considering her own often goes towards overseeing punishment sewing!

Author:  Kathy_S [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I think part of the reason for calling people out of classes was to make the offense a public embarrassment -- rather like the Untidy Badge given the saintly Helen in Jane Eyre. Not that it seems to have been the most effective deterrent in the world, though the culprits do blush now and then....

Author:  Sunglass [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Kathy_S wrote:
I think part of the reason for calling people out of classes was to make the offense a public embarrassment -- rather like the Untidy Badge given the saintly Helen in Jane Eyre. Not that it seems to have been the most effective deterrent in the world, though the culprits do blush now and then....


Doesn't the badge say 'Slattern' and get bound around poor saintly Helen's forehead? Wonderful word! And am I remembering this right (if it's not in Jane Eyre, then it's definitely in some other Victorian novel) that at some point, Helen also has untidily folded garments pinned to her clothes as a punishment for untidiness? Perhaps it could be implemented in the CS instead of all that time-wasting calling people out of lessons? I could quite enjoy the prospect of saintly Len (whose only flaw appears to be ineradicable untidiness) wearing a Slattern Badge and a crumpled handful of collars and cuffs!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Doesn't it say in one (or possibly more) of the books that they get called away from whatever they are doing - so presuming that it takes Matey at least a couple of hours to go around and inspect every single dormitory thoroughly, surely that could mean lessons, break or possibly even prep?

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

If Matron rather than Peggy had been the cause of delaying Althea, would Miss Charlesworth have tackled her? I think not and more's the pity.

Author:  JayB [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

ChubbyMonkey wrote:
Doesn't it say in one (or possibly more) of the books that they get called away from whatever they are doing - so presuming that it takes Matey at least a couple of hours to go around and inspect every single dormitory thoroughly, surely that could mean lessons, break or possibly even prep?

In either Althea or Prefects Len is called away from supervising prep to go and tidy her drawers - thereby giving Jocelyn & Co the opportunity to misbehave. (I don't know what had happened to the convention, made so much of in New House, that the HG's room was exempt from inspection by Matron.)

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

I realise that it was just a plot device to leave Jocelyn and co unsupervised (although saying that there was a phone call for Len would have done just as well), but it was absolutely appalling that the Head Girl was humiliated in front of a group of younger girls like that. Everyone has it dinned into them from day one that the prefects are Very Important People who represent the Head and must be treated with the utmost respect, and then Len gets hauled out of a room full of naughty Middles because she's put her hairbrush in the wrong place or not lined her socks up neatly!

Author:  JayB [ Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

One would think supervision of younger girls should take precedence over tidy drawers. And if Len at well past eighteen, within a few weeks of leaving school, isn't tidy by now, she never will be, so what's the point of it? It does seem very petty and unnecessary of Matey.

Author:  Margaret [ Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
I realise that it was just a plot device to leave Jocelyn and co unsupervised (although saying that there was a phone call for Len would have done just as well), but it was absolutely appalling that the Head Girl was humiliated in front of a group of younger girls like that. Everyone has it dinned into them from day one that the prefects are Very Important People who represent the Head and must be treated with the utmost respect, and then Len gets hauled out of a room full of naughty Middles because she's put her hairbrush in the wrong place or not lined her socks up neatly!


Can you imagine what Joey would have said if she had been so treated in front of a crowd of middles? When she was head girl she was very much on her dignity.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

If prefects are supposed to be the Head's representatives, I'm just trying to imagine Miss Annersley being called away from a lesson because her room isn't tidy :lol:

Author:  MaryR [ Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

ChubbyMonkey wrote:
If prefects are supposed to be the Head's representatives, I'm just trying to imagine Miss Annersley being called away from a lesson because her room isn't tidy :lol:

It's not Miss Annersley, ChubbyMonkey, but I did once write a short drabble entitled *Adjusting One's Drawers* on much the same theme, which is in the archives. I've been trying to post a link to it, but the thing won't open when I do that! :roll:

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

*goes to look it up*

Author:  Kathy_S [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

MaryR wrote:
It's not Miss Annersley, ChubbyMonkey, but I did once write a short drabble entitled *Adjusting One's Drawers* on much the same theme, which is in the archives. I've been trying to post a link to it, but the thing won't open when I do that! :roll:

Here it is:
Adjusting One's Drawers

Author:  Miss Di [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Thanks for posting the link Kathy. Mary, that was funny.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Thanks for the link!

That was brilliant :lol:

Author:  Selena [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

that's fantastic Mary :D i loved the ending :D

Author:  Loryat [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Isn't there a bit though where Margot says that Len is the only tidy one of the triplets??? Clearly at that point EBD was unable to depict Len as having a single fault.

I think the untidy drawer thing was probably accepted by staff as a way of humiliating the untidy one, and probably Matey was so mean that you wouldn't want to do it on purpose!I don't think EBD was the only author to show Matrons hauling girls out of class, either.

I think Mademoiselle was a good Head, and I really like that EBD had a Frenchwoman as head at a time when foreigners were widely despised (just look at Miss Browne's attitude).

I think Miss Browne is a bit out of her depth and maybe too old fashioned for a school headmistress, though not a bad person, just a bit weak. When you think about it moving her school was a bit daring, though it could have been motivated by desperation. When it comes to her confiding in Elaine too much, I think it's partly cos Elaine isn't really worthy of her trust, and partly that she confides things that she really should have known would cause trouble - criticising the school that's hoaching with foreigners just across the lake.

Author:  MJKB [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Loryat wrote:
I think Mademoiselle was a good Head, and I really like that EBD had a Frenchwoman as head at a time when foreigners were widely despised (just look at Miss Browne's attitude).


I agree with you whole heartedly on that. EBD was streets ahead of her contempories in relation to internationalism.

I've often wondered whether or not Kathie Ferris would have continued teaching had the series run on longer or was there a stethoscope with her name written on it. She was referred to as a born teacher on a couple of occasions I think, but then so was Mary Burnett - or was she the 'born student' with the inference that she would not be likely to marry and of course she did.

Author:  Mel [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

But didn't EBD suddenly remember Biddy, write the Australia back story for her, marry off the rather dull Mary, and bring back Biddy as History mistress?

Author:  Alison H [ Sun May 17, 2009 12:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

It always confuses me that Biddy's back story just appears like that :lol: . There are a lot of changes in the few years between the big gap after Rosalie and the move to Switzerland: Gillian, Mary and Grizel all go, Madge and Jem are sidelined, Robin decides to move to Canada permanently, and even Joey is off the scene for a while: maybe EBD decided that a general shake-up was needed and replacing Mary with Biddy was part of it.

EBD seemed to be setting Nancy Wilmot up as Hilda's successor, so maybe we'd have seen Kathie stay on so that she and Nancy could form a kind of double act in the way that Hilda and Nell did. Most of the other mistresses who stayed on long term seemed to be fairly minor characters - Rosalie and Matey featured much more than people like Miss Derwent did.

Author:  MJKB [ Mon May 18, 2009 10:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Women: When Staff Go Bad

Alison H wrote:
EBD seemed to be setting Nancy Wilmot up as Hilda's successor, so maybe we'd have seen Kathie stay on so that she and Nancy could form a kind of double act in the way that Hilda and Nell did. Most of the other mistresses who stayed on long term seemed to be fairly minor characters - Rosalie and Matey featured much more than people like Miss Derwent did.


Yes, I think you're right. Apart from Hilda and Nell, I can't think of two closer friends than Nancy and Kathie. There's certainly no hint at all that either will change status, in the near future, anyway.
Kathie, it always seems to me, gained maturity and confidence very quickly after the first her first term. In fact, it's abit too quickly for me. In Richenda, she is in her second term, still only 22, and she is termed a 'woman' rather than a girl. Biddy O ryan's youth, on the other hand, is often stressed, and she at that stage was at least 5 years older than Kathie.

All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/