The CBB
http://www.the-cbb.co.uk/

Themes: Class
http://www.the-cbb.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5873

Author:  Róisín [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Themes: Class

This is more about class consciousness than about classes-of-pupils, if that makes sense! What do you think of the portrayal of class structure in the Chalet series? Was EBD especially conscious of class differences and do you think she sought to promote these or work against them? Are there any themes, characters or plotlines in the Chalet series which you think are classist? Does the stated policy of the School itself agree with its actual views?

Please join in and discuss below :D

PS having typed the word 'class' so many times, it now looks like a strange word that is spelled wrong! :lol:

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'll shut up about Joan Baker/Rosamund Lilley, as I've talked endlessly about them on other threads. I do think EBD's writing can be terribly interesting when she gets to portray working-class/lower-middle class characters, like the younger Reg, and the glimpses of UK servants or 'village people' we occasionally get, like Phoebe Wychcote's Debby. Richenda's nanny, or Granny and her family in Gay - I think there can be a real life and vigour in her characterisation, especially in her writing of their speech, even if they're only walk-on parts. (And I miss this in the blander portrayal of Anna and the non-British servants and peasants, who are mostly icons of perfection/hysterical and silly rather than individuals...)

I find her anxious about class markers in a minor way - which is hardly surprising, given that she seems to have made herself middle-class from a poor start in a back-to-back with an outdoor toilet at a time that was bristling with class consciousness. I think it's not unrelated that, despite the fact that, say, Joey has a socially unassailable position as Head of San's Wife, EBD chooses not to describe most of her houses in terms of UK class markers. If you think even about the class markers in what English people call their living room/lounge/sitting room/drawing-room/parlour/front room (all with their own class connotations), Freudesheim has the neutral, foreign 'Salon'. And think of the snobbery in issues surrounding bought vs inherited furniture etc - again, I think she's bypassing that by giving Joey a preference for relatively classless wicker, rather than filling her houses with antiques from Pretty Maids.

I find some of her ideas about class a bit worrisome, like her apparent belief that the classes look inherently different. She says that Gay Lambert, when she runs away, could never be mistaken for a 'cottage girl', even though she's wearing a 'disgraceful old raincoat and beret', but that 'there was no mistaking what she was' because of her 'highbred little face' and 'graceful carriage'...

Author:  Tor [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD has her heart in the right place when it comes to class, I think, and I really think she sees snobbery as truly terrible. However, it doesn't mean there aren't elements of class related snobbery that creep in all over the place.

One thing that interests me in respect to EBDs take on class is the contrast between 'British' and 'European' class systems. In part I think this reflects a general early 20th British perception, hanging over from Empire etc, that the British upper classes/aristocracy (never quite clear on the dividing lines between Nobility/aristocracy etc) are some how more important than their continental equivalents.

For example, at the 'upper end' of the class system we get plenty of titled nobles, and their daughters attending the school, from the continent but none from the UK (except Sir Jem and a few other doctors who had been received honours, of course, but I was thinking of the hereditary kind). The CS girls seem firmly rooted in the upper-middle class bracket. Naturally, as the school began in Austria, it is to be expected that there would be a relatively higher amount of local vs British types, but once the school moves to England, we don't see the same number of pupils of equivalent class. Instead the school continues in its solidly middle-class feel.

Basically, I am trying to say that EBD wouldn't have dreamed of sending Hon. so-and-so or Lady whatever the CS, I think. But felt quite happy having the Von und Zu types in the Tirol. Either she felt it wasn't likely to wash with her readers, or perhaps she felt she wanted to avoid the class system of the UK on purpose (especially due to that 'we don't bother with that rubbish' attitude she promotes in the stories). Or she just couldn't escape her own class roots (middle class?) and imagine her characters mixing with her 'betters' :roll:, whilst a foreign system was so alien, she could play with it more freely.

At the bottom end of the spectrum with the working class, the Austrian and Swiss 'peasantry' certainly get a different treatment to the fairly offhand comments about their equivalents in the UK. Innocence is stressed above ignorance in the former, it seems (with the exception of superstition), and its a whole lot more picturesqye.

In fact I am now wondering if by taking the school the Austria in the first place it opened the door for EBD to try and shake off varioius aspects of class-consciousness that permeate say Enid Blyton more obviously. Ok, EBD has her picturesque peasants etc who all adore their pretty English mistress etc, but she is able to avoid making any comments/descriptions that would be immediate short-hand for lower-class to a reader. When the school becomes less international (i/e/ in the UK and in the Swiss books), these little class digs seem to appear here and there, even if they are accompanied by caveats that CS girls aren't snobby!

And following on from that, what do non-British readers pick up on? Presumably you aren't attuned to the same class-related things, and what riled/rattled a upper working-class Brit like me, might just wash over the heads of others.

Author:  Emma A [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
... I find some of her ideas about class a bit worrisome, like her apparent belief that the classes look inherently different. She says that Gay Lambert, when she runs away, could never be mistaken for a 'cottage girl', even though she's wearing a 'disgraceful old raincoat and beret', but that 'there was no mistaking what she was' because of her 'highbred little face' and 'graceful carriage'...

I suppose it goes with all those comments about middle-class girls not attending "the village school" when it's the only alternative to boarding school or being taught at home (for example in Three Go, Len says that "of course" Mary-Lou won't attend the village school in Howells, and Polly Winterton mentions in Peggy that they wouldn't have learned anything at the village school "except broad Yorkshire").

I think that in Gaudy Night, one of the dons comments lightly that she's sure that the scouts spell better (and dress better) than the dons, and elsewhere a general school education is considered pretty good. So I wonder if the objection is down to parents not wanting their offspring to come home talking broad dialect or with disadvantageous accents :wink:

Author:  Alison H [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Other than Thekla’s rudeness to Sophie Hamel and some of the others, the difference in backgrounds between girls from upper class families, girls from professional families and girls from well-to-do trade families never really becomes an issue, and after the first few years almost all of the girls are from similar upper middle class backgrounds anyway, so I think that the main issue is the relationship between the upper middle classes and the working classes.

I’d say that EBD liked to think of the CS world as a kind of paternalistic world in which kindly employers (or should that be “masters and mistresses”?) treated their employeers (servants?) with courtesy, and took a friendly interest in their lives, and were adored by them in return. The main example is the relationship between MBR clan and various members of the Pfeifen family, but there are many others too – the Cochranes’ cook spends money she can ill afford on a present for Grizel, Biddy speaks very highly of “Miss Honora”, Karen takes Miss Annersley plates of her favourite cakes, Mrs Lilley names her daughter after “Miss Rosamund”, Mrs Trevanion is upset when Eustacia is rude to her maid, etc.

Relationships like that certainly existed in real life, and I can imagine that in the world of 1930s Tyrol Marie was very glad to be working for someone as nice as Madge, but a) not all relationships were like that, b) it gets a bit much (would Marie really have been over the moon to get a photo of the CS girls as a wedding present?), and c) it’s an outdated portrayal by the 1930s and even more so by the 1950s. Anna, Karen and the others seem willing to put up with working very long hours, and being shown little consideration over e.g. changes of arrangements. The only time when a more realistic relationship is shown is when there are staffing problems during the War.

Outside the mistress-servant relationship, I don’t think EBD’s attempted portrayal of things works at all. We are repeatedly told that CS girls are not snobs, but the fact is that most of them are. OK, that’s not unrealistic in the slightest, and I’m sure that children from “village schools” had plenty of uncomplimentary remarks to make about the CS and its pupils, but it does rather grate on me when EBD keeps saying that CS girls aren’t snobs and then we get Len (in both Armishire and Switzerland) making snotty remarks about “village schools” and “village kids”, Lalla Winterton making unpleasant remarks about village schools even though she herself is so poorly educated that she ends up in a class with girls much younger than her, Mary-Lou not being allowed to play with children from “unsuitable” families and everyone looking down on Joan Baker in a way that is clearly related to her social background.

Just a couple of random thoughts. I wonder if Reg might have approached his courtship of Len differently had he been from an upper middle class background – I wonder if he might not then have thought it necessary to ask Jack if he’d “mind”. Also Biddy’s “Irishness”, rather than the fact that she comes from a working class family, becomes her distinguishing feature: we’re always being told about her Irish lilt etc, and I wonder if she might have been portrayed differently had she been English (i.e. like most of the other staff members, so that her being Irish wouldn’t have marked her out, so to speak), and spoken with e.g. a broad Brummie accent.

Sorry for the very long waffle :oops: !

ETA - no offence to anyone with a Brummie accent, just picked it because I went to university in Birmingham!

Author:  Emma A [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
... Also Biddy’s “Irishness”, rather than the fact that she comes from a working class family, becomes her distinguishing feature: we’re always being told about her Irish lilt etc, and I wonder if she might have been portrayed differently had she been English (i.e. like most of the other staff members, so that her being Irish wouldn’t have marked her out, so to speak), and spoken with e.g. a broad Brummie accent.

That's very interesting, perhaps because an Irish accent is considered delightful, and, perhaps more crucially, not associated with any particular class. If she'd been a Brummie, as Alison suggests, all efforts would have been made to train her out of the accent, I think, and she may have felt more of a social impulse to lose an accent with adverse class connotations.

Rosamund, for example, loses her "slight Hampshire" accent when at the Chalet School, but she is also shown not to have the same speech patterns as, say, the triplets, when she says, "can we have a lend of" a book, when Len would say "may I borrow" said item.

Having said that, some parts of dialect or accent are very hard to get rid of - I'm from Newcastle, and I still don't pronounce grass like "grahss" after thirty years of not living in Newcastle :D

Author:  JS [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
She says that Gay Lambert, when she runs away, could never be mistaken for a 'cottage girl', even though she's wearing a 'disgraceful old raincoat and beret', but that 'there was no mistaking what she was' because of her 'highbred little face' and 'graceful carriage'...


This phrase has always annoyed me too - what on earth does a 'highbred little face' look like?

Apart from aberrations like that, however, I pretty much agree with Alison and Tor. I think EBD's declared feelings on class are pretty egalitarian for their time (ie Frieda(?) telling off Thekla and saying it's what we are, rather than our fathers' jobs which matter). Although her undeclared class consciousness also comes through in the 'village school' comments which other people have mentioned, I think she did really try.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I fear I don't agree, Emma A, about Irish accents being considered 'deightful' and not being associated with any class - though it's very interesting that that's your experience. I think that's true of some people, but my experience in England has often been that the automatic association (among the upper-middle and upper classes) of an Irish accent with working classness/drunkenness or fecklessness etc is, unfortunately, alive and well! I think Alison's point about 'Irishness' appearing to trump class in Biddy's case is a good one, though, because Irishness appears for EBD to have picturesque connotations that an English working-class child wouldn't have... Certainly by the time Biddy is a middle-class teacher and then a San doctor's wife, her accent presented as part of her charm, but only because she's now socially secure. If Joan Baker had been the same girl, but Irish rather than Hampshire, it would have been a different matter.

I think Tor and Alison H are right to point up the difference between English class consciousness (generally not criticised and possibly only half-conscious on EBD's part) and European class consciousness (seen as irrelevant, old-fashioned and/criticised). Thekla is clearly criticised by EBD for her snobbery, as are the de Mabillons in Summer Term for their attitude towards their son's dancer wife.

But I notice that Joey's own re-telling of the relationship between the ballet chorus girl and the French aristocrat, even when she's being rightfully angry at French class consciousness, is actually itself quite snobbish. She makes their (perfectly legal and church-celebrated) marriage sound vulgarly hole-and-corner, and the fact she says Gaston ‘establishes Anne-Marie in a flat in a quiet suburb’ makes her sound more like a high-class hooker than a respectable wife, which is only heightened by the fact Joey then describes him as spending 'his days at his job and his nights with Anne-Marie' - which again sounds more like she's a 'kept woman'. And finally, Joey says Anne-Marie's father was a smalltime grocer and her mother was ‘from much the same class’, so Anne-Marie, in being a dancer and marrying an aristocrat, 'seems to have been a regular hop-out-o’-kin’. It's exactly the same kind of sentiment you get when the young Reg expresses a desire to be a doctor, only in his case, he has a middle-class father to 'explain' it.

I think it's another example of the fact that EBD means terribly well in class terms, and her 'message' is always that snobbery is bad, but I think probably unconscious biases creep in and show themselves in little things like Gay's 'highbred' face (which presumably means a 'cottage girl' would have a 'lowbred' face, making class some kind of biological thing - if you took a 'lowbred' cottage girl, gave her a lot of money, educated her to a high level, and married her to a San doctor, would she still look 'lowbred'?)

Author:  Emma A [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
I fear I don't agree, Emma A, about Irish accents being considered 'deightful' and not being associated with any class - though it's very interesting that that's your experience. I think that's true of some people, but my experience in England has often been that the automatic association (among the upper-middle and upper classes) of an Irish accent with working classness/drunkenness or fecklessness etc is, unfortunately, alive and well!

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear, in that I meant that for EBD, the Irish accent is meant to be charming and delightful. If asked, though, I would say that most English people generally find an Irish accent very pleasant to listen to - and am rather shocked to find that people do have such negative associations.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emma A wrote:
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear, in that I meant that for EBD, the Irish accent is meant to be charming and delightful.


Sorry if my last comment came off as a rant - it's a bit of a sore point, or has been in the past, as is probably obvious!

To go back to the topic, I'd agree with whoever said they'd be fascinated to hear from people who aren't British/au fait with the British class system, to see what they made of questions of class consciousness in EBD.

Author:  Alison H [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The highbred face thing also comes into place with Joan Baker. When Ricki meets Joan, Joan is presumably dressed the same as the other girls and has no make up on, and her perm would have grown out by then, but Ricki immediately clocks Joan's "cheap prettiness", presumably as opposed to Len's "delicate" prettiness. I find that and the "highbred face" comment rather distasteful: it smacks a little bit of eugenics, although I'm sure EBD didn't for one minute intend it to sound like that.

We never see any of the CS girls encountering class prejudice from the other angle: it'd be interesting to see how they coped with being called "You snotty cow" or "Little Miss High and Mighty" or something like that by one of the children from the village schools which they criticise, or getting a comment like "People like you think that you're so much better than people like us, don't you?". I would think that the children in Polquenel had plenty to say about Mrs Trelawney senior for not letting Mary-Lou play with them.

ETA - just remembered about Vera Smithers, who was the daughter of a self-made man (war profiteer?) and "adored" Elaine whose father was, by contrast, a baronet. So that's Thekla and Vera on the upper class/upper middle class as opposed to "trade" front, but it never seems to happen again.

Author:  JS [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's funny, isn't it, that just about the only 'English' accent from a pupil which isn't RP comes from Jack Lambert's occasional forays into 'Cheshire' (apart from Rosamund and Joan). Yet the Scottish girls who are presumably of the same class as the English pupils, and who would quite probably have spoken RP too, generally have some kind of Scots 'burr'. I'm not just talking about the Macdonald twins, who are parodies just as appalling as Biddy's 'Oirishness', but girls like Kathie Robertson.

Incidentally, I do know at least one girl whose parents sent her to boarding school because they didn't like her Scottish accent, even though they were Scottish!

Author:  Tor [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Highbred faces... yes this is ridiculous (although I might buy inbred faces for the very uppermost of the upper classes :lol: :lol: ). You see it a lot in trashy romance and sci-fi novels,though then the term used tends to be 'coarse' to denote someone of lower-class rank. If they are worthy poor, they get a more refined face, and usually turn out to have some aristocratic/elven (in fantasy/sci-fi) blood!!! Presumably be traced back to early fairly tales, so whilst it is ridiculous abd snobbish, I suppose EBD is just using a (objectionable) well-worn short-hand for equating looks with status/character....

Biddy's broad Irish accent is firmly stamped out - she always gets into trouble if she breaks into Oirish, so I'd say EBD was not as sympathetic as all that. A little picturesque lilt remains, admittedly, but that's all. The girls who speak English as a Foreign language (and EBD clearly doesn't see the Irish as doing so) are not similarly chastised for having an accent when speaking English. Or not that we see, presumably they must have come under the same strictures a British girls on French/German days. But And irish accent isn't allowed, and isn't seen as a foreign' accent, and is therefore much more aggressively criticized.

I think the prejudice towards Irish accents in the UK has faded in recent years, but was very much present in the 50's, 60's and 70's. My mum lost her accent very quickly on going to convent school in London - they sent her to elocution lessons!!! She said before then at her primary school in Sussex she had been tormented by the English kids for being Irish, and just could not wait to become 'anonymous'. She has vivid memories of the 'no dogs no blacks, no Irish' signs in various B&Bs they tried to find rooms in when my Grandparents moved over here. Dogsbody by Diana Wynne Jones (first published in 1975) is quite an eye-opener as to contemporary anti-Irish sentiment during the Troubles.

And don't get me started on the way people behave towards any hint of cockney.... I speak dead posh after having been ritually humiliated by various people at university and in the academic world! Weak character I guess, or I take after my Mum in just wanting an easy life!

But as to what the the CS girls might have had to put up with in reverse snobbery/teasing at thier accents ... I am once again reminded of the Mitfords and the Mitford voice. I think Debo hated/quit war work because all the other people would make fun of her voice!

Author:  Margaret [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sadly I fear that EMBD's snobbishness come out even when Biddy gets her Doctor. Remember she doesn't get an [i]English[i]Doctor, so I'm very much afraid [i]foreign[i] aristocracy must have been inferior in her book.

Author:  KatS [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I was always fascinated by the idea that you can tell from looking at someone/talking to them what class they are, regardless of how much money they have at the moment. I can tell easily how rich someone is, but could never figure out how rich their grandparents or even parents were.

I definitely missed out on some of the subtleties - I was very surprised to learn on here that the Grandma in Gay, for example, was portrayed as lower class

Author:  JayB [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

JS wrote:
It's funny, isn't it, that just about the only 'English' accent from a pupil which isn't RP comes from Jack Lambert's occasional forays into 'Cheshire' (apart from Rosamund and Joan). Yet the Scottish girls who are presumably of the same class as the English pupils, and who would quite probably have spoken RP too, generally have some kind of Scots 'burr'. I'm not just talking about the Macdonald twins, who are parodies just as appalling as Biddy's 'Oirishness', but girls like Kathie Robertson.


Gwensi is strongly Welsh at times.

Before wireless, cinema and tv, I imagine most girls who had lived in one place all their lives would have had some kind of regional accent on first arriving at school, because they would never have heard anything else.

EBD herself must have had a NE accent as a girl. I wonder if it faded after she moved away from the NE, if she made a conscious effort to rid herself of it, or if it remained strong all her life.

Author:  JS [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

KatS wrote:
Quote:
I was always fascinated by the idea that you can tell from looking at someone/talking to them what class they are, regardless of how much money they have at the moment. I can tell easily how rich someone is, but could never figure out how rich their grandparents or even parents were.


I was once in a conversations (short-lived!) with people who described folk in terms of whether they were first, second or third-generation public school. That was a real eye-opener.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Have now given myself the giggles by thinking about Prince Charles's 'highbred' face - perhaps Gay was the dead spit of him, complete with ears? :lol: :lol:

Tor wrote:
But as to what the the CS girls might have had to put up with in reverse snobbery/teasing at thier accents ... I am once again reminded of the Mitfords and the Mitford voice. I think Debo hated/quit war work because all the other people would make fun of her voice!


Good point - I imagine Tom and Robin would have been liable to get this in their urban missionary/settlement work. I can imagine Tom taking it in good part, or toning down her own accent without thinking about it, but I have more difficulty imagining the Robin, who's led a very sheltered life, dealing with continual sneering at her 'hoity toity' speech.

Mind you, there's a kind of well-meaning paternalism in EBD's portrayal of Tom's missionary work with her inner-city boys' club. She undoubtedly does very good work, offering training in various trades, opening a library to help with literacy levels, which will get them better jobs etc, but EBD says in Jane
Quote:
In return, she asked for loyalty to their Club, habits of regular washing and cleanliness, honesty in act and speech, and generosity in handing on their enjoyment to other boys.

Which does rather suggest these inner-city boys aren't clean or honest unless it's specifically required of them by a middle-class person controlling access to the good stuff. Again, terribly well-meaning, but... ETA: this, for me, is a difference between EBD's very poor but idealised Tiernsee peasants/Vater Johann's parishioners and her portrayal of the UK poor - there's no suggestion that help for them should depend on them adopting a particular kind of approved behaviour.

Yes - do we know what EBD sounded like as an adult? Are there any recordings of her? From her obsession with beautiful RP voices, I can never decide if she had acquired one herself and was secretly vain about it, or if she had never lost a regional accent she didn't like, making Hilda a fantasy alter-ego?

Author:  Cat C [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

KatS wrote:
I was always fascinated by the idea that you can tell from looking at someone/talking to them what class they are, regardless of how much money they have at the moment. I can tell easily how rich someone is, but could never figure out how rich their grandparents or even parents were.

I definitely missed out on some of the subtleties - I was very surprised to learn on here that the Grandma in Gay, for example, was portrayed as lower class


But it's not about money - read Jilly Cooper's book Class or, far more recently Kate Fox's book The English. It's much more about whether you have a sofa, settee or a couch, or whether you use coasters, or consider it more important to dress for weddings or for Ascot or would show someone around your house, or your attitude towards garden gnomes and what have you that delineates class. Or to put it more simply - how you spend your money, rather than how much there is to spend!

And EBD was caught in terms of knowing all about the class system, and not being able to ignore it realistically, while at the same time trying hard not to let it get in the way of her fairly egalitarian ideals (I like to think, anyway).

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Margaret wrote:

Post subject: Re: Themes: Class Reply with quote
Sadly I fear that EMBD's snobbishness come out even when Biddy gets her Doctor. Remember she doesn't get an English[i]Doctor, so I'm very much afraid [i]foreign[i] aristocracy must have been inferior in her book.
Sadly I fear that EMBD's snobbishness come out even when Biddy gets her Doctor. Remember she doesn't get an [i]English[i]Doctor, so I'm very much afraid [i]foreign[i] aristocracy must have been inferior in her book.

Yes, that struck me too, and I was almost afraid to proffer it as an opinion. It meant that Biddy didn't breach any [i]realsocial barriers with her marriage. The only other 'mixed marriages' in the CS were Robin's parents and Maria Marani. It's interesting that Maria doesn't quite reach the dizzy heights of an English doctor. She had to make do with a tutor, a socially indeterminate occupation.

Author:  Róisín [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Yes - do we know what EBD sounded like as an adult? Are there any recordings of her? From her obsession with beautiful RP voices, I can never decide if she had acquired one herself and was secretly vain about it, or if she had never lost a regional accent she didn't like, making Hilda a fantasy alter-ego?


I think she was on television in the sixties, but I don't think there is a recording of it :? Wasn't that the inspiration for Joey Goes on Television?

Author:  Tor [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

This is from a review of "In Tearing Haste" (letters between Deborah Devonshire and Patrick Leigh Fermor, might have to add to my list of books to read!). It's an anecdote also told in the Mitford Letters, and I wanted to quote from it, but had lent it to someone else. Anyway...

Quote:
Debo tells Paddy she was “in the garden talking to a friend, too loud I expect as per, when a man came up and said Excuse me I've read about a 1930s voice but I've never heard one, do keep on talking please. So I did, lorst and gorn forever & he was doubled up and so was I & in the end he said well I'll give you one thing, you haven't got a stiff upper lip”


Which is, in my opinion, the way to deal with someone teasing you about your accent! It helps if you are in the gardens of your palatial stately home, I suppose, but there you go! And then the teaser is also being nice.

Quote:
I think she was on television in the sixties, but I don't think there is a recording of it Wasn't that the inspiration for Joey Goes on Television?


Really? I'd love to see that. I expect EBD would have had an Rp accent, or something approaching it, because she seems to have had quite a strong association with the theatre (am I right on this?) and theater types. I'd guess they 'spoke well', and we tend to speak like those around us. I'd have said she went in for a rather dramatic voice (but soft, gentle and low, of course!). Her emphasis on speech and performance in the books seem to also hint at first hand experience of some kind of dramatic training/involvement.

Author:  Mel [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

In 'Behind the Chalet School' by Helen McClelland she says that EBD's maternal grandfather was very canny with money, investing wisely etc so thet Elinor and her mother were fairly comfortably off, enough for such middle-class joys such as private education (for EBD) and a live-in maid. This may have coloured her views, on the one hand not wishing to be class-conscious and on the other wanting to note the inate refinement of people like her. In the same book it states that Elinor had a very loud rather plummy voice! In Jilly Cooper's 'Class' she claims , not too seroiously, that the aristos are tall, lean, with pointy stoat-like heads, thin bodies, and further down the social scale people get fatter. The chips presumably?

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Jilly's quite vicious about some of the British middle classes. She obviously dispises the lower middle class Brian and JenTeale and has endless fun at their expense She ridicules their dust free homes,their attempts to be elegant, their propensity for crease free man made fabrics and their distaste for sex because it's messy. She's none too keen on the Middle Middles either. She pokes sly fun at the upper middles and thier nuerosis, heavy drinking and insequrities, but as she is from that class herself, the humour is not cutting. Her favourtite people of all are the Stowcrats who do whatever they like, shoot all round them and drink like fish and are utterly charming. Methinks that Jilly reallyregards the British upper class as the lords of creation and that she would so very much like to have been born into ot.

Author:  Tor [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

On EBDs income, whilst googling EBD on TV (yes I know :roll: :oops: , nothing came up), I did come across this little biog which I found quite interesting:

http://www3.shropshire-cc.gov.uk/brentdye.htm

What struck me is that EBD went on teaching/being a governess even when being a successful writer. So maybe her writing income wasn't that much of a salary, all told. That makes me feel quite sad, I'd hoped she was rolling in it!

The other thing that struck me, and although I had known this already, it's implications never really sank in, was the fact that there had been no headstone on EBDs grave until FOCS put one up. Did this mean she died without leaving money for her funeral arrangements (again, not the sign of a wealthy person)? Or was it just that there was no-one left to arrange it. This latter seems like the saddest possible thing - at least if it had been a financial thing one could imagine the possibility that EBD just didn't save but had a rollicking good time spending her money in her latter years.

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Can't remember where I read this, but some article on 20th century children's writers states that they earned very little from their books, most of the profits going to the publishers. No JK. Rowlings then. Eynid Blyton was obviously well off, but she was married to a surgeon, and it always struck me that she was cannier than EBD.

Author:  Róisín [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Have just checked up in McClelland and yes, EBD was on the 'Tonight' show in 1964; it's described on p266 of 'Behind the Chalet School' and is also described in the Newsletter for that year. If anyone wants (and doesn't have these books), I can type up the relevant page, just shout.

Author:  Tor [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

If it isn't too much trouble, Róisín, I would love to read those extracts.

Author:  Róisín [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

OK this is an extract from Behind the Chalet School which is itself taking an extract from Newsletters (my copy of which is at my mother's):

Quote:
"Chalet Club Newsletter for July 1964

On January 2nd I had a new experience - I was on Television in the programme "Tonight"... it was most interesting. First the official interviewer, Brian Redhead, met me and explained to me the sort of thing I should be expected to answer. The editress, Elizabeth Cowley, came along and joined in and then we were escorted to the studio... a great room filled with cameras moving about the floor and brilliant lighting. Cliff Michelmore was incharge of the programme as usual and when we sat down, we found he was about to interview someone with some most beautiful fowls. We were all warned to be prepared to leap to the rescue if the birds became restive and showed signs of scuttling. Far from it, they seemed dazed by their unusual surroundings and declined to show off in the least. Then came a recorded interview with the Astronomer Royal, and finally myself. Everyone I know who saw me has informed me that I might have been accustomed to being interviewed daily. I seemed so calm. It wasn't like that, you know. It was simply that there was such a friendly atmosphere about the whole place I couldn't have felt nervy if I had tried."

To this day a few people still remember that interview. And apparently Elinor did not exaggerate in saying that she had 'seemed so calm'. By general agreement she really had spoken extremely well. 'Unexpectedly well' was the verdict of Mrs Phyllis Matthewman; but another friend was in no way surprised, having always considered her 'a larger than life, flamboyant sort of person'; and Miss Farr Smith commented that 'Elinor could make a most amusing speech, just like that - anytime'.

That 'gift of the gab' was something else that Elinor shared with Joey, who naturally was to follow her author on to television. And Joey too discovered that 'thanks to [the interviewer's] experienced questioning and her own lack of real shyness, it was ... easy enough' (CCNL 1968).

For Elinor, the thrill of being on 'Tonight' was followed the next day by an official tour of the Children's Book Exhibition at Olympia, which she visited at the invitation of WH Smith and Son. This, not being a new experience, 'wasn't quite such an excitement as the Television'. Nevertheless, 'everyone was delightfully kind', and Elinor write that she had 'thoroughly enjoyed it'. No doubt too, her TV appearance the previous night had given an extra boost to the Chalet School for, as she herself puts it: 'Honestly, I signed autographs until my hand was aching!'


Isn't it fab? Helen McClelland's book is such a good read and she did her work so thoroughly.

Extra points to EBD for bringing 'editress' to bear on a real person, and for her finding a man whose name was actually 'Redhead' and she didn't make it up.

I always find it interesting that the EBD you'd imagine wrote the books was quiet and serious like one of her studious girls, but the EBD found by Helen McClelland was flamboyant, theatrical and complicated :D

Edit: I'm too lazy right now to look up the dates, but I wonder did her meeting with the Astronomer Royal contribute in any way to the character of Prof Richardson?

Author:  Mia [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Excellent. Someone on the Ruey thread said it was published in 1960, so it's slightly too late.

I do love the comments of Phyllis Matthewman, one always needs a friend to bring one back down to earth...

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

JS wrote:

Post subject: Re: Themes: Class Reply with quote
KatS wrote:
Quote:
I was always fascinated by the idea that you can tell from looking at someone/talking to them what class they are, regardless of how much money they have at the moment. I can tell easily how rich someone is, but could never figure out how rich their grandparents or even parents were.


Poverty can be etched into the face as well. When I came to my present school in 1996 it was just at the beginning of the boom in Ireland. There was dreadful deprivation in the area and you could see it in the children's faces. Thirteen years of relative affluence has made a huge difference to the general appearance of the majority of the students.
We still have our fair share of poverty, quite alot of it as a result of addiction. It's hearbreaking to talk to young teenagers whose lives are blighted by the serious drug problems of their parents.
I'll never forget my first visit to Mountjoy Prison (Dublin) where I took a group of sixth years back in 1996. Something like 80% of prisoners were from 3 socio-economically deprived areas in Dublin.
Sorry, pardon the rant.

Author:  Tor [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Thank you so much, Róisín! Simply brilliant - from the way she writes, and the added comments about ehr flamboyant personality, I am now 100% she spoke luvvy-style!

In fact, I am sure she sounded just like a friend's mother (who is in her nineties) - she has a wonderful voice (sweet and low!), and almost exactly the same cadence as that newsletter text. It's what I think of as Matthew Parris cadence (Radio 4's Great Lives presenter, amongst other things). No wonder Jane was such a vivid character amongst any number of dullards in the later books - perhaps chanelling a bit of EBD directly!

I think the BBC had a tendency not to archive it's various footage in those days, and took a haphazard approach to what was kept and what was binned, but I wonder where one would even begin tring to find out if any copy of this show still survived?

ETA: just searched the British Film and TV archives, and they do have some recordings of the Tonight show, but not the 02/01/1964 that I can see. :(

And, yes - poverty and wealth can very often make a very distinct mark on people's appearance. But the only way a general physique or appearance could actually become 'fixed' for a socio-economic group would be for there to be no socioeconomic mobility for several generations, and - moreover - no shinnanigans between the hoi poloi and their servants etc!!! If people really think they can tell whose someones grandparents were because of the way a person looks, then it is (in my opinion) either a reflection of (i) their own prejudices or (ii) the sorry state of society. Sadly, with low amounts of social mobility, it is quite common to be able predict correctly that someone who is clearly poor (or wealthy) today probably had parents of similar wealth. But you wont always be right, which is something good at least!

Afternoon rant over!

Author:  KatS [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sorry - wanted to make it clear that (except in the case of really grinding poverty) I was referring to being able to tell how rich people were from their clothes etc, not from their physique.

That's why all the comments about the Maynard girls in second-hand clothing, and Gay in her disgraceful raincoat, and Joan's new and expensive but not Chalet dresses throw me a little, because in my (fairly limited) experience, newer more expensive clothes = more money = higher class

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think there's an element of "old money" families feeling that they'd got nothing to prove, and "new money" families wanting to let everyone know that they've got money, if you see what I mean. There are loads of stories of people seeing dukes or earls in old clothes and mistaking them for the gardener, and that sort of thing. And the papers are always going on about Princess Anne is always turning up to big events in clothes that she had 20 years :D .

I can certainly imagine the Bakers, immediately after getting their cheque from the pools company, rushing out to kit the entire family out in new gear, partly so that everyone'd be able to see that they now had money.

There's an element of being practical, too - one reason that "old money" families have money is that they've been careful with it over the years. That doesn't really apply with the Maynards who didn't have that much spare cash, but the Queen is notorious for being careful with money. There's a story about her making Prince Charles, when he was a kid, spend ages looking for a dog lead that he'd lost :lol: .

Author:  Tor [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Sorry - wanted to make it clear that (except in the case of really grinding poverty) I was referring to being able to tell how rich people were from their clothes etc, not from their physique.


Don't worry, KatS! That was 100% clear from your comments. EBDs writing on just such subjects are evidence, in my mind, that she couldn't shake off her own ideas of class (and presumably the 'innateness' of class, it not being linked with wealth, but with breeding), no matter how much she wanted to.

But, as with with maths, it is clear that EBD is not strong on post-New Synthesis biology. Heredity is not her strong point (Robin and Adrienne being a case in point). But to be fair, most of the key texts that brought genetics firmly into the biological fold, and put an end to more 'eugenics'-like thought, weren't published until the 40's, and DNA not discovered until the 50s, and so it probably passed her by.

Author:  Jennie [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

When I'm out gardening in my dreadful stained jeans and sweater with holes everwhere, my sons pretend that I'm the jobbing gardener.
Perhaps they ought to start calling me the Duchess.

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
But, as with with maths, it is clear that EBD is not strong on post-New Synthesis biology. Heredity is not her strong point (Robin and Adrienne being a case in point). But to be fair, most of the key texts that brought genetics firmly into the biological fold, and put an end to more 'eugenics'-like thought, weren't published until the 40's, and DNA not discovered until the 50s, and so it probably passed her by.


Love to know more about that subject. Anything simplified version of it you could suggest?

Author:  Tor [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Love to know more about that subject. Anything simplified version of it you could suggest?


MJKB - do you mean the science or more to do with the history of science?

For the former, I'd recommend The Language of the Genes by Steve Jones. He's good on relating genetics to everyday life, and includes plenty of anecdotes etc. (For instance, when discussion Lamarkian vs Darwinian evolutionary theory - the former being of the giraffe stretched it's neck variety - he refers to an experiment that was carried out where scientists cut the tails off mice to see if 'taillessness' would be inherited. Of course, it wasn't, but he goes on to point out that it hadn't struck the researchers that this same experiment had been carried out for centuries amongst Jewish and Islamic peoples.....)

Not so sure about the history of science perspective, though. I was thinking directly of the publication dates of all the classics I so frequently reference!!! But there is bound to be plenty of stuff on Watson & Crick, at least. Not so sure about books on people like Ernst Mayr (who were fundamental to the 'New Synthesis', that is linking genes with ecology and evolution)

Author:  Sunglass [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

KatS wrote:

That's why all the comments about the Maynard girls in second-hand clothing, and Gay in her disgraceful raincoat, and Joan's new and expensive but not Chalet dresses throw me a little, because in my (fairly limited) experience, newer more expensive clothes = more money = higher class


That's one of the differences between UK and US senses of class, I think - UK 'old money' has often/usually looked pretty wrecked and shabby, and wearing obviously new clothes/buying new furniture brands one as a parvenu with the newest of new money (rather as the Bakers 'make the money fly' after their pools win, compared to the Maynards' handed-on ginghams etc). One of the Sunday papers runs a 'social stereotype' cartoon every week, and one of them a few months ago was the boy heading off for his first term at public school, initially ashamed of his battered trunk and blazer, both of which had been his grandfather's and father's - until he realises that the only child with brand new belongings is the parvenu son of the Russian oligarch, and that in fact he's socially approved of.

It's one of the reasons there's widespread middle-class and upwards disdain for the flashy 'footballers' wives' style of living. It's also one of the reasons Woody Allen's English films got things wrong so often - he doesn't understand how old/new money works here.

But as other people have said, the 'foreigness' of the CS means EBD doesn't really have to present key characters like Joey in terms of the British class system...

Author:  Mel [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

That's so true about the clothes, think of Jo and pals in Rescue wearing their old (but scrupulously clean) clothes with pride. And doesn't Jo say in one of the later Swiss books - Summer Term?- that she never feels entirely comfortable in new clothes? But as with so much with EBD the idea was outmoded by the mid-60s.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
But to be fair, most of the key texts that brought genetics firmly into the biological fold, and put an end to more 'eugenics'-like thought, weren't published until the 40's, and DNA not discovered until the 50s, and so it probably passed her by.

I agree that EBD probably had little knowledge of genetics, but DNA was actually discovered in 1869 by Friedrich Miescher, and a number of scientists contributed to our understanding of its structure and function before the 1950s. I would probably give credit to Oswald Avery, Maclyn McCarty & Colin MacLeod (1944) for providing the first solid evidence that DNA carries genetic information, and to Erwin Chagaff (1937) and especially Rosalind Franklin for providing the data on which the Watson & Crick model was based. (You probably don't want to hear me rant about the scientific misconduct involved in appropriating Franklin's data.)

Author:  Cross Eyed Lens [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
"Chalet Club Newsletter for July 1964

On January 2nd I had a new experience - I was on Television in the programme "Tonight"... it was most interesting. First the official interviewer, Brian Redhead, met me and explained to me the sort of thing I should be expected to answer.


Can it be coincidence that within a year of being interviewed by Brian Redhead, EBD publishes Redheads at the Chalet School?

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
And following on from that, what do non-British readers pick up on? Presumably you aren't attuned to the same class-related things, and what riled/rattled a upper working-class Brit like me, might just wash over the heads of others.



Which is why as an Australian I find all the discussions about class interesting-I don't pick up what everyone else does.

I was never offended by the way EBD wrote Biddy's accent purely because hearing someone else talk with a different accent can make words sound really different. I can remember the first time I went to Nth Ireland, I had an impossible time understanding some people, there accents were so thick and when I found out the spellings of some places, I was shocked cos it sounded like a completely different word. For example the name Roisin. When I first heard it, it sounded like they were saying Russian. So EBD writing words like they sound to me was never a parody but simply trying to show how a different accent sounds to some people. And even Deira descends into Irishness when she's upset.

I never saw the problem with Joan being continually described as cheaply pretty or common because I kind of equated her to the girls at school who would leave school at 15, wore heavy makeup or wore their uniforms in a more revealing/showy way and even if she stayed through to the end, it's hard to get rid of that persona, especailly when it's said in Wins the Trick that she makes up for being conservative at school, over the holidays, and she would never completely lose that side to herself. Rosamund who wasn't like that, would never have that side to her. I think girls weren't close to Joan simply because they travelled two completely different paths and had no common interests, not so much because she was from the working class. Many of the girls had the same problems with Elma Conroy and she was from the same class as them and she was never truly accepted until she changed.

Rescue was my last book and I read it as an adult and what horrified me the most was more Auntie didn't want Reg to go on with school, which I didn't associate as a class thing mainly cos my parents who are definately working class, would be horrified if we didn't go on in school and do well, mainly cos as Mum said, Dad didn't want us working in a factory like he had to. I couldn't believe a parent wouldn't want their child to go on and study. Yet many of the middle class girls were never expected to either.

When I worked in the UK as a Nanny I came accross the class divide and found it hard to deal with at times. I found the Upper class were free and easy and accepting as they had had money and had their private incomes etc, they had nothing to prove. The middleclass were always trying to become upperclass and so were the snobbiest and then you had the working class, and I think there's a difference between the labouring one and the professional working class. I worked for one family, where the mother looked down on the noveau rich and was quite disparaging about them but then she was a self confessed snob, the stupid thing was a I could see everything she said in the next family I worked for and tried to forget it as quickly as possible cos I didn't want to turn into a snob who worried about all that stuff. I can see how living in that atmosphere, it would be hard to not pick up on it or have it come through, which is why I think it doesn't so much when she writing about the continental girls, but does when she's writing about the English ones.

I didn't realise Mary Lou actually had children in the area except the vicarage girls or Clem and Tony. That is so snobbish unless the children were from the local drug dealers house or violent homes and Gran and Mrs Trelawney wanted to keep them out of all that. Which I could understand, but the Winterton's not going cos of the accent to the detriment of their education, no wonder they turned out the way they did

I'm sorry, I've just realised I've written a thesis here :oops:

Author:  Róisín [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Fiona Mc wrote:
I'm sorry, I've just realised I've written a thesis here :oops:


But a really interesting one!

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Fiona Mc wrote:

Many of the girls had the same problems with Elma Conroy and she was from the same class as them and she was never truly accepted until she changed.


She isn't, though. Elma is the daughter of the owner of a chain of beauty shops, hence very new money and 'trade' - quite different to the irreproachably upper-middle-class girls who make up most of the CS population. Not unlike Diana Skelton, whose background is kept a secret by the CS staff, and who is even less respectable new money - her father had worked his way up from a knacker's yard to owning a big glue factory. Both these girls are from families which are now prosperous, but not socially OK - and they and Joan Baker (whose family has just won, rather than made, their money) are portrayed in terms of a 'bad' sophistication which seems to be related by EBD to their class background. I'd see it as one of the places where her well-meaning message of social equality is undermined by her own class biases.

Actually, come to think of it - it's not insignificant that her class biases emerge only when she deals with UK class. Sophie Hamel is also from a prosperous 'shop' background in Tirol, but, even though she's sneered at by Thekla, EBD never suggests for a moment there's anything dubious about her class provenance.

Fiona Mc wrote:
I was never offended by the way EBD wrote Biddy's accent purely because hearing someone else talk with a different accent can make words sound really different. I can remember the first time I went to Nth Ireland, I had an impossible time understanding some people, there accents were so thick [...]So EBD writing words like they sound to me was never a parody but simply trying to show how a different accent sounds to some people. And even Deira descends into Irishness when she's upset.


But one person's 'thick' accent is another's ordinary speech - everyone has an accent after all, whether it's the Queen, Germaine Greer or me! I'm sure you'd be the first to acknowledge during your time in Northern Ireland their speech wasn't inferior, just from a different place to your own accent. But only certain ways of speaking are continually cracked down on at the CS as 'wrong' - as someone else said, the various Continental girls are never rebuked for having French or Swiss or German or Dutch accents on the school English days, and, bar a few words here and there, EBD doesn't write, say, schoolgirl Simone's accent in an offensively 'Allo, allo, I am - 'ow you say? - Frahnch' way. The equivalent to Biddy's stage-Irish speech would be if Emerence's Australian accent was written out phonetically in a fairly offensive stage-'Strine' way every time she opened her mouth, with everyone continually rebuking her for the way she spoke. (Mind you, I imagine the only reason EBD doesn't criticise Emerence's Australian accent far more is that she probably wasn't terribly familiar with how Australians spoke!)

I do appreciate that EBD is writing at a time when RP was considered the only 'correct' way to speak, and she is extremely unjingoistic by the standards of her time - and that somehow Biddy's accent as an adult, has somehow become charming, rather than just wrong!

Author:  Tor [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
prosperous 'shop' background in Tirol, but, even though she's sneered at by Thekla, EBD never suggests for a moment there's anything dubious about her class provenance.


I'm sure EBD would have made exactly the same anti-snob comments if it had been in an English context (in fact, alongside the rather odd way the staff decide not to mention Diana's 'background', they make ll the right overtones about how they admire him etc). She always professes to believe this, and I am sure she felt did, but her actual depictions of characters and how they are upbraided for various character traits belie her anti-snob message.

It is so interesting to see that if you aren't highly attuned to British class consciousness, then EBDs 'official CS party line' on class is much easier to swallow! I can't find my copy of Gay, but given what KatS said earlier, I really mean to dig it out and see what made me assume Grandma was working class. It must have been speech/cadence, but I can't remember.

Of course, sensitivity to such is very much evidence of my own class consciousness - I can't deny I have plenty of that. But, what makes it worse within the CS is that 'good' traits are explicitly linked to refined/upper class and bad traits to lower.

And following on from CatC mentioning of U and non-U phrases (see this link for details):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U_and_non-U_English

How I would love to do a search for the various terms in the the CS transcripts and see where they sit on the U-non-U spectrum (me thinks in the non-U!). But instead I return to the elephants...

Oh, and I don't think EBD would have given Emerence an Australian accent mostly because I think she saw her as British (in the same way Jo Scot doesn't get a Kenyan accent). Interestingly, however, the americans don't get much of a phonetically rendered accent (the use of drawl, rather than just said, is quite frequently used, and the choice of words and phrases different, but that is it). Nope, I think sadly, Biddy's accent may have been pandering to a prevalent stereotype. And that's probably why it seems to really get up the nose of the various Irish board members. How do our Scots members feel about the Highland twins?

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Enid Blyton does use a bit of comedy French: one of the Mamzelles in MT says "Certainlee" and it confused me terribly when I first read the books as a little kid!

Emerence is initially described as having a Cockney accent. So is Diana, but I assume that Diana came from London: I'm not sure why EBD thought that a Queensland accent would sound like a Cockney accent :? .

Interestingly, Armada edited EBD's attempts at writing Highland speech (which are similar to EJO's), so the hb of Highland Twins has Flora and Fauna repeatedly referring to their "pig sister" Shiena but the pb doesn't.

Author:  Tor [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

my post just crossed with yours, Alison H!

but I just had to add... Australian does sound a bit cockney! My SLOC comes from a well to do Sydney family (first fleeters, in fact) and a very well-spoken English family. The families are both lovely, but I have to admit they both were a little snarky when they found out I hailed from Essex, and I have to put up with all the usual teasing. But a very favourite memory is when various teasing was going on from the Australian side, and SLOC piped up

"Well, you know when I talk to Tor's sisters [who are more essex-sounding than me], they sound just like all my Australian cousins. In fact I'd say Cockney was posh Australian."

That shut em up.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
I can't find my copy of Gay, but given what KatS said earlier, I really mean to dig it out and see what made me assume Grandma was working class. It must have been speech/cadence, but I can't remember.


It's pretty unambiguous with Grandma, who's another of EBD's salt of the earth ex-servants who's learned niceties from her former employers (like Biddy and Ros Lilley's mothers). She uses non-standard/regional forms from that first meeting with Jacynth and Gay on the train - 'I'll lay that' and 'aye' etc - and is addressed as 'Grandma' by her family (and called that by EBD throughout!) - and of course her family are small-time shopkeepers.

Then when she writes to Miss Bubb (the kind of paper she uses and that she thriftily crosses the paper are class markers) to protest her treatment of Gay:
Quote:
The English was not all it should be; but the writing was unexpectedly pretty. She was not to know that in her youth Grandma had been first schoolroom-maid in the household of Lord Midgeley, and, later, lady's-maid to the young ladies, as they had refused to part form their ‘dear Becky’ until she left them to be married. Like the shrewd Yorkshirewoman she was, she had picked up all she could from them, deliberately forming her writing on that of the old-fashioned governess who had educated them. Lady Burt and the Hon. Alice Midgeley still wrote to their Becky at regular intervals, and visited her at least once a year, and she was proud of the connection.


And then, when she comes to see Bill, there's the ultimate UK class marker - how she takes her tea! Note that Bill has correctly predicted (and presumably warned the maids in advance, though in precisely what words I can't imagine!) how someone of Grandma's class likes her tea:

Quote:
I hope it’s as you like it,’ she added, pouring it out with an inward shudder for its blackness.
But Grandma eyed it with approval. ‘That’s a good cup of tea,’ she sad, removing the black kid gloves she had donned for the occasion.


This kind of old-fashioned, shrewd, right-thinking, knowing-her-place-but-not-cowed thing is very much EBD's idea of the respectable working class, rather than the pools winning/shop-bought cake/eating fish and chips with Vic Coles etc of Joan Baker's background.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Presumably the governess let Grandma watch her writing, in the same way that Miss Honora let Biddy watch her eating ...

Helen Forrester, in her autobiographical series about her upper middle class family who had to move to a working class area when their father lost his job and got into debt during the Depression, says something about the contrast between the handwriting of the two eldest children of the family, who began their education at what was presumably a fairly posh school, and the handwriting of the younger children who were taught how to write at the school near their new home. Their snobbish parents are horrified at how the younger children write, presumably because it makes them seem working class.

I can understand how different types of writing might betray different levels of education (mine is illegible to most other people so I'm sure what that says about me :lol: ), but personally I'd never associate it with class - unless some people just equate the two.

Poor old James Kettlewell writes to Madge on "very expensive paper", using "elegant English", but even so Madge notices straight off that the letter's written in a "most illiterate hand" ...

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I was assuming the disjunction between poor James Kettlewell's expensive paper/high-flown English and, on the other hand, his poor hand-writing suggested money but low origins and no education. Actually, aren't we pretty much told that when Madge, Joey and Grizel meet him on the train, anyway? He's some kind of wool manufacturer, speaks regional English, drops his hs and doesn't realise he's not supposed to address ladies in railway carriages, far less offer them gooseberries or subsequently propose to women who are socially out of his league!

But I always very much like Grizel mentally registering the difference between Madge's warm human response to him, and her stepmother's chilly good breeding. I suppose you could see it as an aspect of Madge being entirely secure in her own unassailable class position, even if she's currently in fairly precarious financial circumstances - someone rather lower down the ladder, in equally impoverished circumstances but trying to cling to 'respectability', might be more likely to repulse James K's overtures. It's one of the places where class trumps money, but at least it expresses itself here in a warm, humane way.

Author:  hac61 [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
"Well, you know when I talk to Tor's sisters [who are more essex-sounding than me], they sound just like all my Australian cousins. In fact I'd say Cockney was posh Australian."


Being Essex born and bred, I feel I have to protest here!

The Essex accent is nothing like Cockney. "Thameside", that which is spoken in various communities along the north bank of the Thames, could be compared to Cockney because most of the original settlers were from London.

Essex as it is spoken in places like White Knotley, Thaxted or Tiptree is completely different.

[/end protest] :)


hac

Author:  Tor [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The James Kettlewell incident sets the tone for the series with respect to the emphasis on kindness and a no to snobbishness of all kinds (if not quite equality). None of us can fault EBD for trying.

I am trying to remember what book it is - maybe it is School at - where Dick gets Madge and co through a crowd of poor children in Innsbruck and remarks something like "As bad as Port Said", or something similar. I think this might be the only incident where the continental poor are not grouped up in the picturesque mountain peasant group. I can't remember, but i don' think, any of the party is moved by the urban poverty (unlike, say, the genuine concern for the Teirnsee poor in winter).

Quote:
Essex as it is spoken in places like White Knotley, Thaxted or Tiptree is completely different.


Ah, but Essex as it is spoken in my bit of Essex is! Embrace the diversity :wink:

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Dick "addressed them with a ready flow of language" and then said "Awful little beggars" :shock: . Joey gives some money to a hungry child in Innsbruck in Jo of, and the CS and San people and IIRC also Mr Lannis and Mr Flower send money to some sort of church mission in Innsbruck in Exploits, but, as you say, no-one seems very affected by the poverty they see when they first get off the train - although they may have been a little disconcerted at being surrounded by children begging for money.

Author:  Abi [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Aren't they supposed to have travelled quite a bit before (my School At is upstairs so I'm probably inventing this!)? So maybe it's partly a case of being hardened to it. And of course Dick's attitude was pretty much the standard one for the time.

Author:  Tor [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
And of course Dick's attitude was pretty much the standard one for the time.


Oh yes! I'm not disputing that. It was more that I was interested in EBDs idea of 'worthy' vs 'unworthy' lower class. In the UK books, there isn't this separation between picturesque country lower-class and urban lower class I don't think. Instead, the stress is between those who ape their 'betters' and those who don't.

Although, I guess you could argue that hard-working Tiernsee folk, with their pretty manners and devout natures are, in a way, fitting that niche of 'know-thy-place' but acting with dignity etc, whereas begging very much doesn't! So maybe it is all wrapped up in the same ideal of EBDs as those portrayed in the UK books.

Author:  MJKB [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
And then, when she comes to see Bill, there's the ultimate UK class marker - how she takes her tea! Note that Bill has correctly predicted (and presumably warned the maids in advance, though in precisely what words I can't imagine!) how someone of Grandma's class likes her tea:


I love that bit. When I first picked up on this 'acid test' at a very tender age, I became anxious about the fact that my parents both loved a decent - and for decent read trot a mouse across it - tea. Actually, the vast majority of Irish people of my acquaintance anyway, would rather drink fetid water than weak tea. I think its just an English thing.
Slighty ot, but when Maggie Thatcher became PM there was so much made of her 'humble' origins. In Ireland, because of her education and her parents' 'respectability', she would have been considered solidly middle class and would have fitted in beautifully to Dail Eireann and even Aras an Uchtaran.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Oh yes! I'm not disputing that. It was more that I was interested in EBDs idea of 'worthy' vs 'unworthy' lower class. In the UK books, there isn't this separation between picturesque country lower-class and urban lower class I don't think. Instead, the stress is between those who ape their 'betters' and those who don't.



Sorry for going on too much on this thread :oops: . Just been reading a book about Spanish history and a lot was made in that about how visitors from other country found the rural poor in their pueblos in the Andalusian hills "picturesque" but didn't feel the same about the urban working-classes in crowded areas of central Barcelona, etc., and that reminded me a little of some of the things in the Tyrolean CS books.

I'd say that the differentiation between the rural working classes and the urban working classes in the UK was much more a 19th century thing (this was part of my dissertation so is a pet topic!) - dark satanic mills in England's green and pleasant land, the rural poor dancing round maypoles in Tess of the d'Urbervilles versus the urban poor as (not very well, IMHO, but that's another story!) depicted by Charles Dickens and Elizabeth Gaskell, Engels going on about people being degraded by living in what would now be called inner city areas, and so on. Then it moved on to the idea of the "worthy" working classes belonging to friendly societies and going to night school versus those who didn't ... er, sorry, am going way OT here :oops: .

As Tor said, there isn't really the same "picturesque" depiction of the working classes in the Golden Valley villages in the UK books. Don't Daisy and Beth and Gwensi catch a couple of local men poaching?

Author:  Selena [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
I was assuming the disjunction between poor James Kettlewell's expensive paper/high-flown English and, on the other hand, his poor hand-writing suggested money but low origins and no education. Actually, aren't we pretty much told that when Madge, Joey and Grizel meet him on the train, anyway? He's some kind of wool manufacturer, speaks regional English, drops his hs and doesn't realise he's not supposed to address ladies in railway carriages, far less offer them gooseberries or subsequently propose to women who are socially out of his league!


If he’s a self-made businessman, he’s probably an opportunist, though :wink:

BTW, I’ve always wondered how Rosamund Lilley manages to have only a “slight Hampshire accent” when she grew up in the house next door to Joan Baker’s. They went to the same school and had friends in common - surely they should also have the same accent?! :roll: :lol:

Author:  Lottie [ Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Selena wrote:
BTW, I’ve always wondered how Rosamund Lilley manages to have only a “slight Hampshire accent” when she grew up in the house next door to Joan Baker’s. They went to the same school and had friends in common - surely they should also have the same accent?! :roll: :lol:

I used to put my two small daughters into the same tub of water in the evening and one had a "bath" while the other had a "barth"! :lol:

Author:  Kate [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Selena wrote:
BTW, I’ve always wondered how Rosamund Lilley manages to have only a “slight Hampshire accent” when she grew up in the house next door to Joan Baker’s. They went to the same school and had friends in common - surely they should also have the same accent?! :roll: :lol:


I don't have the same accent as anyone in my family.

Also, we travel between our house and the house where my dad grew up quite a lot - the two houses are in places with very different accents and my brothers' accents would change depending on which side of the Shannon we were on.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
In the UK books, there isn't this separation between picturesque country lower-class and urban lower class I don't think. Instead, the stress is between those who ape their 'betters' and those who don't.


I haven't the book to hand, but is there something of this going on in the rather unsympathetic way the evacuees are portrayed in one of the war books? I remember a discussion here on how Joey takes in the McDonald twins rather than have unpicturesque poor urban kids billeted on her spare space. (Not that I am taking in refugees all over myself, you understand, but I live in a tiny London flat rather than a huge Queen Anne house!)

Not sure about Joan and Ros's accent differences - EBD tells us that the difference is that Ros 'had always spoken prettily' (by which I assume she means a polite register and correct grammar - although we do see Len and Con noting her poor grammar on her first day) and it's only her regional accent that sets her apart from the RP of the CS girls. But perhaps the difference comes back the servant mother 'aping her betters' to use Tor's expression, and teaching her daughters to speak more genteelly. Mind you, I'd have said that for a lot of shop work - say, if she'd worked in an upmarket clothes shop - Joan's mother would have had to speak relatively 'well' also, which wouldn't explain Joan's stronger Hampshire accent and bad language.

Though I suppose the difference might be is that Ros has been taught to copy middle-class speech, and is ready to work on losing her accent quickly at the CS, whereas Joan sees nothing wrong with the way she is...?

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Oh yes! I'm not disputing that. It was more that I was interested in EBDs idea of 'worthy' vs 'unworthy' lower class. In the UK books, there isn't this separation between picturesque country lower-class and urban lower class I don't think. Instead, the stress is between those who ape their 'betters' and those who don't.

EBD in common with many genuinely kind women with social consiences did see a distinction between the worthy - hard working and respectable poor, and the unworthy - lazy and unambitious poor.The worthy poor who were clever and had kind friends would feel a sense pride in receiving an education provided by their betters to ease them into the middle classes.
What the unworthy poor had to do was avail of middle class education and get into positions of power in the media and the unions and so either challenge the status quo or join it. Many challeged the status quo and that was good. Of course they needed
to be cleveracademically to do this.
With the advent of the grammar school the greatest obstacle to the empowerment of the working class, was a lack of academic ability. The alphas went to the grammar school and soon learnt to ape their betters while the betas and the gammas were content to have a practical, hands on education in the secondary moderns. And thus the class system continues with just a shift to the middle. In my view brains, academic ability is the new class key.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
But I always very much like Grizel mentally registering the difference between Madge's warm human response to him, and her stepmother's chilly good breeding. I suppose you could see it as an aspect of Madge being entirely secure in her own unassailable class position, even if she's currently in fairly precarious financial circumstances - someone rather lower down the ladder, in equally impoverished circumstances but trying to cling to 'respectability', might be more likely to repulse James K's overtures. It's one of the places where class trumps money, but at least it expresses itself here in a warm, humane way.


But that was what I found when working as a Nanny in the UK. The Upper class were the least snobby as the had nothing to prove, the middle class were the worst as they were trying to be upper class and were continually doing things for show and the professional working class just wanted their kids to do well in school and worked to help them have better lives. The snobbiest one was a mother whom had been adopted by an Upper class family-she was a self confessed snob and admitted it. It sounds like Mrs Cochrane continually had something to prove, whereas as you said Madge despite being poor didn't due to having the class

Author:  Maeve [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Concerning Gay's class being obvious from her appearance, this type of comment seems very common to me in writing from a certain period, i.e., I could swear I've read similar observations about fictitious characters in a zillion other books -- but of course, can't think of any offhand! The only thing I could find right now is from John Buchan's Huntingtower
Quote:
The little face was more square than oval, with a low broad brow and proud exquisite eyebrows.
The eyes were of a colour which he could never decide on; afterwards
he used to allege obscurely that they were the colour of everything
in Spring. There was a delicate pallor in the cheeks, and the face
bore signs of suffering and care, possibly even of hunger; but for
all that there was youth there, eternal and triumphant! Not youth such
as he had known it, but youth with all history behind it, youth with
centuries of command in its blood and the world's treasures of beauty
and pride in its ancestry.
Strange, he thought, that a thing so fine
should be so masterful. He felt abashed in every inch of him.

My point being that I think this comment about Gay was more of a throwaway line on EBD's part, writing as she found elsewhere, rather than being the result of some long-thought out opinion on class.

I like Tom Gay's boys clubs and how in Wins the Trick they donate something to the CS sale:
Quote:
I run a boys' club for younger boys and teach them woodwork among other things. I told them one night all about our Sale and happened to mention my own dolls'-houses. Next class, the leaders came and told me they wanted to have a go at houses themselves. When the houses were finished we had a show and families came and admired them. The kids asked to see the one I was doing for you folk this year and I had to tell them I had no time for my own work now¬adays. Result – they got into a huddle and then told me they wanted me to choose any twelve I liked of theirs to send. Decent of them, for they're none of them wealthy. Most are the kids of dock labourers and that sort of thing.

Author:  Tor [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
My point being that I think this comment about Gay was more of a throwaway line on EBD's part, writing as she found elsewhere, rather than being the result of some long-thought out opinion on class.


Yes, I'd agree with this. Except that I also see it as quite telling, in that whilst it is a well worn tool of not-very-good literature, EBDs employment of it implies a general acceptnce on her part that there is something inherently different beteween classes. Not, you say, thought out - I fully believe thatEBD intellectual opinion on the subject was one of belief that everyone was equal and judged on their merits.

Its just that she seems to confuse small issues of correct etiquette and speech with real moral worth!

I'm don't think we can blame EBD for any of this, after all we are all guilty of all kind of prejudices, even if we acknowledge them as such and try to remove/get over them. But it interesting to explore the separation between the 'message' and the subtext, if I'm using the right lingo.

And that is so interesting about the Andalusian example, Alison. I actually think it is very much the case today - people much prefer to look/have sympathy for say rural/pastoral African communities (and want to, for example, spend their gap year there), than a Nairobi or Jo-burg slum. The latter type of inner-city poverty is often too hard to stomach, and makes people switch off, whilst the former can stir enough sympathy to want to 'do' something. And both these examples generate more sympathy that poverty on ones own doorstep! Human nature, maybe....

Author:  Maeve [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass asked:
Quote:
do we know what EBD sounded like as an adult?


Can't find EBD but there's a nice sampling of Enid Blyton at http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/audiointerviews/profilepages/blytone1.shtml where she talks about how she got into writing. Don't know how she and EBD compare in terms of background but she sounds plummy enough.

Slightly OT, this led me to a link of a 2006 radio interview with Clarissa from GGB about GO lit. at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/04/2006_34_wed.shtml

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
I actually think it is very much the case today - people much prefer to look/have sympathy for say rural/pastoral African communities (and want to, for example, spend their gap year there), than a Nairobi or Jo-burg slum. The latter type of inner-city poverty is often too hard to stomach, and makes people switch off, whilst the former can stir enough sympathy to want to 'do' something.

That's probably why Mother Teresa's championing of the urban poor in Culcutta was so revolutionary. Such poverty can seem so overwhelming that people hopeless in the face of it.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Maeve wrote:

My point being that I think this comment about Gay was more of a throwaway line on EBD's part, writing as she found elsewhere, rather than being the result of some long-thought out opinion on class.


Oh, I agree, but I'd also agree with Tor that it's a bit dismaying to find EBD slipping into that kind of class eugenics cliche when her own conscious ethos is one of equality for all. And while absolutely, you come across it quite a lot in a certain kind of early 20thc novel, there's a bit of a difference between having John Buchan trot it out (Oxford educated, ending up as 1st Baron Tweedsmuir and Gov Gen of Canada etc etc) and encountering it from a novelist who grew up in a back-to-back and who was at least on nodding terms with social deprivation. She presumably didn't think a school story was the right place to start interrogating that kind of cliche, but you might expect her to avoid it altogether ...?

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
And while absolutely, you come across it quite a lot in a certain kind of early 20thc novel, there's a bit of a difference between having John Buchan trot it out (Oxford educated, ending up as 1st Baron Tweedsmuir and Gov Gen of Canada etc etc) and encountering it from a novelist who grew up in a back-to-back and who was at least on nodding terms with social deprivation.


Why should it be worse coming from EBD than from Buchan?
Thing is, we're as shocked now a days by overt mention of class differences
as our 19th and 20th century forbears were by frankness in sexual matters. One still hears comments about 'good breeding' only it tends to be sotto voce

Author:  Tor [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I became anxious about the fact that my parents both loved a decent - and for decent read trot a mouse across it - tea.


MJKB, your 'trot a mouse' comment keeps popping into my mind and making me chuckle. I just wanted to say thank you! It really tickled me.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Buchan seems to have led a life of extreme class privilege - Oxford, various colonial admin jobs, married a Grosvenor, gets made Baron Tweedsmuir, state funeral when he dies etc etc - maybe he was actually sheltered and bigoted enough to believe codswallop like 'centuries of command' and high breeding imprinting themselves biologically on the faces of the upper classes!

But EBD herself grew up in a back to back with an outdoor loo and must have met all kinds of people during a very varied, strongly Christian life, which certainly wasn't spent in some stuffy enclave of the upper-classes. When she dips into the same 'class as biology' cliche (Gay's 'high-bred' face vs Joan Baker's 'cheap' prettiness), she's (unthinkingly?) perpetuating a particularly vapid class libel she must know from her own life experience is total nonsense.

Also smiling in recognition of 'trotting mouse on tea' phenomenon. I like my tea to be Barry's and as strong as Grandma Learoyd takes hers - Bill would die if she saw the inkiness of my preferred brew. It could probably take several mice.

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Also smiling in recognition of 'trotting mouse on tea' phenomenon.
Sunglass wrote:
MJKB, your 'trot a mouse' comment keeps popping into my mind and making me chuckle. I just wanted to say thank you! It really tickled me.


Thanks for the flowers, girls, as Jack Maynard would say.

Re EBD's background and her 'high bred' remark, I remember those types of comments coming from my mother and her contempories, all good christian women too. I don't think for a moment that they were meant to be taken as implying a biological distinction between the classes.I grew up ignoring or laughing at comments like '"breeding shows" or "breeding will out" or"She's a step above buttermilk" (I loved that one). As a small child I thought my mother was talking about 'breathing', so I naturally assumed she meant that 'posh' people had a different breathing pattern to the rest of us.
My mother came from what she regarded as a mixed background socially. Her mother's people were decayed Castle Catholic and her father's were small farmers and cattle breeders.(That might be why she became obssessed by the word breeding!) Although she would never admit it, I think she felt she was neither fish nor fowl nor good red herring, and remained insecure about her family background.
I read somewhere that EBD regarded her father's family as more solidly middle class than her mother's and she way well have felt slightly ashamed of her original family home. Petty snobbery is most often caused by class insecurity, the proverbial tuppence looking down on a penny halpenny. When EBD talks about Gay Lambert's "high bred" face she may have meant what people today mean when they describe someone as classy.

Author:  Alison H [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'd totally agree with what you've said about EBD's own class insecurity, MJKB. The impression I get from Behind the CS is that EBD's own background was lower middle class rather than upper middle class, and that she and her mother were the sort of people who were very concerned with keeping up appearances - possibly largely to try to compensate for the fact that her father had run off with another woman - rather than people like Madge who were totally at ease with who they were (hope that makes sense!).

As much as Joan Baker is the person usually seen as being the main victim of CS snobbery, she considers that her own family are a cut above the Lilleys because Mrs Lilley was in service before she married whereas Mrs Baker was a shop assistant - Joan is herself guilty of petty snobbery. It's quite ironic that EBD presumably meant us to be shocked by Joan's snobbery (mixed with bullying) vis-a-vis Rosamund whereas instead the focus is usually on other people's snobbery vis-a-vis Joan.

Author:  jennifer [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Alison H wrote:
Oh yes! I'm not disputing that. It was more that I was interested in EBDs idea of 'worthy' vs 'unworthy' lower class. In the UK books, there isn't this separation between picturesque country lower-class and urban lower class I don't think. Instead, the stress is between those who ape their 'betters' and those who don't.

EBD in common with many genuinely kind women with social consiences did see a distinction between the worthy - hard working and respectable poor, and the unworthy - lazy and unambitious poor.


And one of the signs of being worthy was being fawningly grateful for the help that was offered by your betters, no matter how condescending. :?

I think there is a good point in the insecurity of the middle class. With the rise of the middle class came the idea that you could work your way up to the upper class - if you earned some money, and studied your books of etiquette and worked on your accent, you could become one of *them*. So there was a lot of stress about being proper, because if you slipped, they would know you were faking it.

The landed/monied upper class, on the other hand, had had generations of being on top, were totally secure in their knowledge that they were superior in all things, and didn't need to worry over the details.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I am having a hard time composing a reply on this topic, mostly since the whole "class" topic is so confusing to me. "Class" seems to be invoked for a baffling mish-mash of issues that, for someone of my background, live in totally separate compartments. There also seem to be a set of class-related triggers that evoke responses that I often find startling in their intensity. So, obviously, I'm not going to react to EBD's treatment of class the way someone who lives in – well, not her culture, but her culture plus half a century or more of social history.

I think possibly one of the biggest reasons for our different perceptions is the difference in class systems. I am getting the impression that the British system had/has some fairly rigid boundaries between all sorts of sub-compartments, and some pressure, not necessarily limited to the upper classes, to "keep one's place." We, on the other hand, at least theoretically, have the "American dream," in which upward mobility is the ideal, if not always the reality. That is not to say we don't have innumerable problems related to economic class, and especially to the whole nasty legacy of slavery. However, the triggers are different. Thus, I was far more shocked by EBD's half-admiring presentation of the KKK than by anything class-related.

Overall, I agree that EBD was trying hard to be egalitarian, though she didn't always accomplish it. Of course, I suspect most of us wouldn't, either, since it's hard to escape life without making value judgments, and we are all partly what our cultures have made us.

Anyhow, here are some of the strands. I can't say anything about the "class marker" words other people bring up, since I'm only just hearing about them and am lucky to understand their common or garden meanings at times.

Village schools/village children
This is an area where I did find EBD extremely snobbish. Of course, I was predisposed to see village schools as positive, given a diet of Miss Read and stories from my-grandmother-the-one-room-schoolhouse teacher. On the other hand, I've listened to any number of well-meaning parents agonizing that they want to support the local school system, and that it isn't fair, but that they want their children to have the best education, and I can't really blame them when I contrast the test scores/discipline problems of some local schools. So, possibly part of the attitude does reflect parental concern over levels of education available in the local schools as opposed to the private sector. Still, some of what comes across is all too similar to code for 'I don't want my children associating with them,' whether them means non-white (here) or some equally bigoted view of lower class children.

How should a "good girl" behave and dress?
This one, as exemplified by Joan & Ros, would never have struck me as class-related, especially since EBD tries so hard to have that pair come from the same school, etc. I actually thought EBD was fairly broad-minded on the subject, with Jack attempting to explain that some of the differences could be cultural rather than interpreting Joan as an immoral boy-chaser. I rather expect each generation to try and tell their offspring that X is acceptable and Y isn't in terms of dress and relationships, and that some kids will rebel more than others. The specifics differ, but the general tenor doesn't much.

Deserving vs. undeserving poor
This one isn't an artefact of the past, here, but very much alive and well, especially during the election season speechifying. Deserving poor want to work/learn/better their lives, and would never think of using their benefits for Vice. Children, of course, always count as deserving, but may have parents out to exploit the system, and politician X will solve this dilemma – no, make matters worse! – etc. So, I didn't find it at all surprising that EBD made related distinctions

Manners.
As in EBD, there are certainly cases of American literary castaways being identified as being 'well brought up' because they eat prettily despite near starvation. (Of course which manners aren't quite the same, since e.g. our version of 'don't gulp your food' is enforced by never being so rude as to hold your knife while putting food into your mouth, as opposed to the remarkable feat of eating with an upside down fork!) However, I'm always surprised when people claim that EBD shows her class prejudices by having [pick an EBD character] only learn manners from an employer. Surely having acceptable manners would be something that helped the employees get the job in the first place? I guess I find the whole idea that good manners are purely a matter of 'aping your betters' extremely foreign, and think some of the evidence that such-and-such a character learned manners that way pretty tenuous. That's not to say that some of what we consider "manners," such as a using a fork in the first place, didn't first become fashionable at court, but I think by EBD's time "manners" were generalized enough to have been taught in homes of all "classes," not to mention put into Girl Guide handbooks, and that she would have thought it insulting to imply otherwise. Thus, to me it seems that she had Rosamund's mother insist on stricter manners because the standard hierarchy ranked "servant" lower than "girl in a shop."

How should the newly rich behave?
The idea that newly rich are more likely to engage in vulgar ostentation than 'old money' is just as prevalent in American literature as in British literature. (not that it stops people from ogling the antics of celebrities!) It's also accompanied by sneers at social climbers who spurn their "roots," or, worse, are embarrassed by their mothers. So, I'm not at all surprised by EBD's attitude toward the conspicuous consumption of winners of pools or offspring of glue barons. What does seem over the top is idea that at least some dialects or that some pronunciations are "ugly." This brings us to the very complex topic of

Language.
It's understandable that, if one of a school's objectives is to teach the grammar and usage that one needs to write to an "educated" standard, correcting ungrammatical speech will help to reinforce that standard. I think that, in EBD's time, there was also an emphasis on elocution that invoked a standard accent, both in the UK and here at home. (again, different standards, but same idea, based on speech therapy here for prospective teachers with the wrong accent) However, the way in which EBD decides which accents are "pretty" and which are ugly/vulgar/low class (I don't think she ever says low class, but apparently this is implied?) is beyond me. I'd say it takes especial nerve to criticize the pronunciation someone uses for her parents' pet names!

I suppose "foreign" (including Scottish & Welsh) accents are another topic entirely, not really tied up with class since the people involved don't fit the traditional niches. It would be rather like the sad Baroness Helena in Betsy-Tacy feeling able to associate with Betsy even though her father is in "trade," but feeling shamed to ride on the trolleys/eat in coffeeshops/otherwise consort with less than noble Germans. Of course that doesn't stop me from wondering about the sources for the accents EBD uses. I personally think she indulged a secret taste for cowboy romances, with a garnish of Wodehouse gangster-ese and a dash of south'n belle, to construct "American." Her Scottish sounds a lot like a rendition of Hebridean dialect by at least one Scot, and I think she did visit there, so possibly she's giving her personal phonetic rendition. No idea about the Irish, which may indeed be from English "stage Irish" or a standard English representation rather than her own transcription of a particular Irish dialect. There does seem to be immense diversity in Irish English even today, and I imagine there would have been more before saturation with TV.

Author:  Maeve [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Maeve wrote:

My point being that I think this comment about Gay was more of a throwaway line on EBD's part, writing as she found elsewhere, rather than being the result of some long-thought out opinion on class.


Oh, I agree, but I'd also agree with Tor that it's a bit dismaying to find EBD slipping into that kind of class eugenics cliche when her own conscious ethos is one of equality for all. ...?


But I don't find the actual quote from Gay to reek (or even hint) of class eugenics. EBD writes:
Quote:
Gay was wearing a disgraceful old raincoat and beret, and she had put on her heaviest shoes for the walk; but there was no mistaking what she was. Her highbred little face, graceful carriage and clear, cultured voice all gave her away if she had had any hope of passing for a cottage girl.


I'm sure she did sound different than a cottage girl; her carriage -- well, when I first came to Romania, people told me that they knew I was a foreigner because no Romanian woman would walk (think *stride freely* :) ) as I did, so I can accept that people from different backgrounds may move/hold themselves differently. I don't quite know what a "highbred little face" is suppose to look like -- but that's the only phrase that possibly seems discriminating to me and the only reason for the whole sentence is to make clear that Gay's disguise was pretty poor, not to say anything about which class is better. I don't see any real value judgment by EBD in this particular passage.

A quote to support the "EBD wants to be sympathetic side" is from Jo of when Joey rescues Rufus.
Quote:
The Bettanys all adored animals, and the same spirit which must have sent Jo off in an attempt to save the puppies boiled up in her sister now. ‘Poor Zita! If they can’t afford to keep her, why don’t they sell her to someone who can?’
Marie stood respectfully silent. It was not for her to speak, but she thought that if Madame had seven children to clothe and feed, and a husband who could earn money only during the summer, since he was a cowherd, she would not have been so indignant over the proposed shooting of a mere big dog who ate far more than she ought to do Of course, if the pups had arrived during the tourist season, they would most likely have sold, in which case there would have been plenty to buy food for all. But Zita had not done what was expected of her, and so they must go. That was a matter of course.
Madge, looking up, guessed what was passing through the girl’s mind. ‘Are they very poor, Marie?’ she asked gently.
‘They can live, mein Fraulein,’ replied Marie dryly.

I think this is one of the few (only?) times we see Marie even vaguely critical of the Bettanys and I think EBD presents her thoughts and Madge's quite fairly (and sympathetically) for each character in their respective social class of the time. I think it's interesting that EBD allows Marie's criticism at all -- she could have had Marie talk tearfully about Zita's owner's, thus prompting Madge's sympathy, rather than presenting Marie's vaguely angry thoughts of, "It was not her place to speak, but..." and "'They can live, mein Fraulein,' replied Maire dryly." It's the first sign of trouble/upset in the CS Tirolean paradise.

Edited because I seem incapable of not transposing key words!.

Author:  Tor [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Maeve wrote:

Quote:
think this is one of the few (only?) times we see Marie even vaguely critical of the Bettanys and I think EBD presents her thoughts and Madge's quite fairly (and sympathetically) for each character in their respective social class of the time.


Yes, I love this bit. It's little scenes like this that elevate the whole series for me, and make it a much satisfying read than,sy, Enid Blyton. And the Gay episode, really, I think comes down to the phrase 'highbred' face. I think this type of literary convention is quite a socially damaging one... but we've trodden this ground fairly into mud!

And I don't think we can expect EBD to be a social reformer on all fronts. She was doing her bit on the ecumenical side, and her internationalism (expressed in both the deeds of her characters and the in the authorial voice) is admirable, particularly as it lasts through the war years.

Kathy_S, that was a wonderfully full breakdown of how you see the issue. The two things I'd respond to amongst them (as I can't face trying to explain the subtleties of the british class-consciousness - perhaps if we all ignore them, they will disappear.... if only!) are the manners and the good girl vs bad girl.

In both of these it is EBD who always qualifies the good manners/behaviour of a working class individual as deriving from their employers. The implication being they wouldn't get them elsewhere. I think that is what acts as a clear signal to me that EBD saw the appropriate way of attaining social mobility/personal improvement was to try and nemulate the behaviour of a higher social class. Like I said, it isn't fair to expect her to be a revolutionary, but what this tells me is that EBD didn't see class prejudice as a problem, but something that rightly described the division between the 'right sort' and the 'wrong sort'. And she usually turned her nose up at little things like, for instance, how someone takes their tea. The current UK short-hand for this would be 'builders tea': very strong and very sweet.

That's my issue with the disjunction between EBDs stated anti-snobbish intent and the reality: if these class markers were just to add colour/describe a person, then there would be no incongruence. But it is the added moral layer, coupled with the the linking of bad behaviour with lower class and good behaviour with upper/middle class (either by birth or by learning it from an employer) that makes for a more convoluted message.

(Of course, EBD is - practically speaking - right: it is still the case that if you want to get on in life, it is better (easier, that is) to modulate ones own style/accent/manners to the social group you want to have influence in, rather than try and change the whole social order itself!)

That was another long post! Oh to be pithier!

Author:  Mel [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I wonder if EBD learned the basics of upward mobility form her own mother who was trying very hard to raise the family up the social ladder by education. She might have been kept from 'rougher' children and was apparently in trouble at school because of her loud voice (not sweet, gentle and low at all!) So I'm not sure that she did mix with the working class. Her home wasn't actually a 'back-to-back' in the original sense of a house which shared three of its walls with neighbouring houses. The picture shown in biographies shows it as a bit grim looking, but that might simply be a poor photograph. In Behind the Chalet School Helen McClelland describes it as a middle class street peopled by solicitors and - yes- doctors. EBD writes so much that she is bound to make some bloomers, but essentially she did believe in upward mobility. I like the way that Biddy, though grateful is never over humble and is allowed to be a naughty Middle.

Author:  Maeve [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Speaking about proper language, I was just looking at Two Sams for a discussion on another thread and found,
Quote:
“Somewheres behind,” Samantha replied. Miss Ferrars frowned. “Not ‘somewheres’, Samantha. We don’t say that in English. It’s ‘somewhere’ without the s.” Samantha blushed. “I guess I’m real American at times, Miss Ferrars. It don’t really matter, surely? Some day I’ll be going home and then I want to talk like other folks.” Miss Ferrars laughed. “It all depends on where you live. I know that in Boston, for instance, the English is as pure as anywhere in England itself. It’s more the accent and intonation that differ. Yes, Samantha. I think it does matter that you should speak correctly. Do your best with it, anyhow. Remember, both of you, that one reason for your being here is that you may learn to speak all of our three languages properly. ...Samantha frowned and then laughed as Janice and Ailie ran off ahead of herself and Samaris. “I guess she’s right. But it’s a mite surprising to be hauled up for using your own language. I didn’t know I did speak American until these last few days, anyway.”


I love her, "But it’s a mite surprising to be hauled up for using your own language."

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD's depictions of the 'undeserving' poor remind me of Harry Enfield's character, Mr. Cholondley-Warner. You can catch him on youtube and I think he's absolutely hysterical. Sorry, a little ot.

Author:  andydaly [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
EBD's depictions of the 'undeserving' poor remind me of Harry Enfield's character, Mr. Cholondley-Warner. You can catch him on youtube and I think he's absolutely hysterical. Sorry, a little ot.


Just been looking at the one called "The Working Classes". Absolutely hilarious. Thanks for this, MJKB!

ETA - Also watching "Women - Know your limits" and am now shrieking with laughter. Brilliant!

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Glad you enjoyed it, I think it's utterly brilliant. Do watch the association football.

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Maeve wrote:

I love her, "But it’s a mite surprising to be hauled up for using your own language."


I think Samantha was remarkably restrained there: Kathie's remarks about speaking "correctly" and using "pure" English would have got right up my nose! It wasn't as if Samantha had used slang or committed some grammatical "crime" such as splitting an infinitive.

Jack Lambert got told off in a similar incident, for saying "collywest". We never see anyone criticise an Austrian girl for using Austrian idioms in German lessons/conversation or to a Swiss girl using Swiss-French or Swiss-German idioms in French or German lessons/conversation.

I know exactly what she means about not realising that she "spoke American" until she got to the CS, though. Until I went to university in Birmingham. which, being in the Midlands, attracted students from all over the country, I honestly never realised that certain words, expressions and turns of phrase were Manchester-isms/Lancashire-isms/Northern-isms rather than being "standard English", because everyone I knew at home spoke the same way as I did! You just don't realise until you're with a lot of people from different places.

Author:  Dreaming Marianne [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's interesting, Kathy S, to read about how different it is in other English-speaking countries. I read recently that a working class man and an upper-middle class man in Boston would sound exactly the same - they both come from Boston. Contrasting that with the UK where you would be pinpointed as soon as you opened your mouth is interesting. Years ago I spend a few months doing a job which wasn't ideal in terms of interest (but needed to pay rent :D ) and was asked by a senior member of staff exactly what it was that I was doing in the post, as I was "from the wrong background". I'm not justifying it, just commenting that it is still very much a way of thinking.

On another topic when I first moved to the west country I had never heard "Where are you?" phrased as "Where are you to?" However I quickly adapted and regularly confuse my parents with it. :wink:

My husband has a completely different accent (broad Zoooomerzeeeet) to his brother, only 18 months youngr. He puts it down to having more of a social life as a teenager!

Author:  Sunglass [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I happened to pick up a copy of Kate Fox's Watching the English yesterday, and was amused by how many of what she calls the Seven Deadly Sins (words or expressions that 'class' you) are avoided by the foreignness of the CS setting.

1. What you say in response to someone asking you a question you didn't hear (What?/Pardon?/Sorry?)is, for KF, one of the easiest tests of class. I've no recollection of this ever coming up in the CS, probably because everyone has such clear, carrying, beautiful voices. :)

2. What you call the toilet (loo/toilet/lavatory/bog etc) Splasheries? Otherwise not called anything at all.

3. Serviette/Napkin. The CS comes out of this on the U side.

4. What you call and when you have certain meals (midday or evening dinner etc). Mittagessen/Kaffee/Abendessen gets round this neutrally.

5. What you call an upholstered seat for two or more people - sofa/couch/settee. The only mention I can think of offhand of this piece of furniture is in Lintons at Die Rosen, and it's a couch, which for KF is 'middle middle class' or lower. But mostly the wicker furniture EBD prefers is pretty classless, as are key features of CS rooms like quaint foreign porcelain stoves.

6. What you call the room your sofa/couch/settee is in - lounge/living room/drawing room etc. the CS universe often uses the neutral 'Salon'.

7. What you call the sweet course at the end of a meal - dessert/pudding/sweet/afters etc. I'm not sure what EBD usually calls this. Most of the meal descriptions I can think of offhand have her saying they 'finished with something sweet and cold and fluffy' - does she have her characters say 'sweet' for the course elsewhere?

Those are Kate Fox's seven, but she does list others which also indicate class, like what you call your parents - Mummy/Daddy, Mum/Mam/Dad, Ma and Pa, 'me/my mum and dad' etc. Joey and Jack's Mama and Papa preference gets round this too.

Author:  JS [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Quote:
I honestly never realised that certain words, expressions and turns of phrase were Manchester-isms/Lancashire-isms/Northern-isms rather than being "standard English", because everyone I knew at home spoke the same way as I did! You just don't realise until you're with a lot of people from different places.


Completely with you there - even now, I'll sometimes use a word which my (English) husband doesn't understand and I haven't realised is Scots (or even Dundonian). eg 'chute' for 'slide'; 'cundy' for 'drain in the street' or 'roan' for 'drainpipe/gutter'.

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The CS fails the pardon test :lol: .

Yseult Pertwee says "Eh?" when she doesn't hear something that Kathie says and, instead of being told to say "What?", is told to say "I beg your pardon" :shock: . I was always told that it was very rude to say "What?" rather than "Pardon?" or "Sorry?", but I've never claimed to be even remotely posh (I say "serviette" rather than "napkin" and refer to the midday meal as "dinner") whereas Kathie presumably does!

Dear me ...

Author:  Tor [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

That list is straight out U- and Non-U by Alan Ross! I know because I picked it up last night and did the same thing as you Sunglass!!!

I've not read Watching the English, but am intrigued how it is stillsee to be valid! Nancy Mitford (...Tor, Tor, the Mitford Bore... I know!) was spot on when she thought publishing that essay would be her greatest tease.

And 'Sweet' is used for desert/pudding in Two Sams!

Other CS-related phrases:
Counterpanes are apparently U (vs coverlets), but plumeaux gets around this on a number of occasions.

Cycle vs bike/bicycle. I think CS girls in the war mix abut between the two. Howeveer, again, in a foreign setting the bikes (cycles :wink:) are avoided.

Home however is non-U! U-peakers apparently use house. No points for Joey there... but she pulls back some U-point by having wirelss, rather than radio, parties

But, oh dear, she's down again on having Preserves made by Anna. But I think they all use jam quite a lot too, so that is another mixed usage noun.

And I do believe that CS girls for the most part 'work' for their exams. THat is U. Studying for them is very non-U!

And on the subject of 'what?' vs 'Pradon?" I'd have been flayed alive by my Mum if I said "What?". According to Prof. Ross, whilst U-speakers use what? or sorry? their nannies and governesses are alwys trying to get them to be more polite>?!

So silly!

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Yseult Pertwee says "Eh?" when she doesn't hear something that Kathie says and, instead of being told to say "What?", is told to say "I beg your pardon" :shock: . I was always told that it was very rude to say "What?" rather than "Pardon?" or "Sorry?",


When I pointed this out to a 'clever' friend of mine who is very big into u non u, and who is constantly correcting others, she claimed the 'I beg' saves it. I don't think Ms Mitford would agree. I've heard Prince Charles when interviewed say , "excuse me" when he didn't hear what the interviewer was saying.
In Reunion, JOey comes up with a most extaordinary word for motorbike - mobike! I think she was hoping it might catch on.

There isn't the same class differences in accent in Ireland, apart from the South side Dubliners, who have this appalling orrrr sound to everything. Instead of "I spent the afternoon in Herbert Park" they say, "Ay spent the orfternoon in Horbort Pork." (I'm a Southsider myself but have migrated temporarily to County Meath.)
There are some lovely words that identify certain counties: In Cork they say 'dollies' for wellingtons, and the 'merries' for a funfair. In Cavan they call amateur dramatics 'the frolics'.

Author:  Tor [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
In Cavan they call amateur dramatics 'the frolics'.


This phrase should become universal (although perhaps beying the seriousness of many an am-dram peformer...!)

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It islovely isn't it?

Author:  Sunglass [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:

According to Prof. Ross, whilst U-speakers use what? or sorry? their nannies and governesses are always trying to get them to be more polite>?!


I think that comes up quite a bit in Nancy Mitford and elsewhere, the nanny/governess trying to instill her class's version of good manners in an upper-middle or upper-class child, who has the careless manners of those who have never doubted their own social importance. There's an unfortunate English governess in a 1930s Molly Keane novel who keeps trying vainly to teach her Anglo-Irish charge her own lower-middle-class table manners, which are much more polite than those of the landed family she works for. I can't remember the exact line, but it's something like 'For all her teaching, he ate as the rest of the family ate, carelessly and greedily, not as though his food was important, but as though he himself were immensely important.' And she worries about the fact that the child says 'damn', whereas the child's mother is more worried that he might pick up non-U expressions like 'ever so' from the governess!

I suppose it's one of the ironies of that kind of cast-iron class system, that U children were looked after by non-U people and then had to have any non-U things they might have picked up eradicated later. It's another one of the things EBD manages to avoid confronting because of the elements of foreignness in the CS books - Anna and Rosli don't really have a definable class the way they would if they were British, for instance, so we don't have to imagine the Freudesheim young learning non-U habits in the nursery, But I suppose you could wonder whether, if R and A are encouraged to speak German with the little ones as they get older, Joey and the triplets then need to deal with the fact that, say, Felicity might show up at the CS speaking German with a strong regional accent/'unsuitable' expressions...?

MJKB - I'm from Cork, and have never heard Wellingtons being called 'dollies' in my life! We used to call runners or plimsoll-y things you'd wear for PE 'rubber dollies', though.

Author:  Ariel [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
There isn't the same class differences in accent in Ireland, apart from the South side Dubliners, who have this appalling orrrr sound to everything. Instead of "I spent the afternoon in Herbert Park" they say, "Ay spent the orfternoon in Horbort Pork."


Is Rachel Allen, the TV cook, from the Southside? I've often thought she has a most peculiar accent...

Author:  Cat C [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I get the impression that EBD was blissfully unaware of any regional / class connotations of any native French or German speakers - apart from the odd bit of 'local peasant patois' that comes into some of the Swiss books and is impenetrable to all but the Maynards and other Gornetz Plat residents.

There was a feature about mothers and daughters in one of the weekend papers for Mother's Day this year where Nigella Lawson recalled one of her mother's unorthodox instructions: Don't ask, stretch! Since she thought interrupting an anecdote was far worse than reaching across the table...

Author:  Róisín [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Ariel wrote:
MJKB wrote:
There isn't the same class differences in accent in Ireland, apart from the South side Dubliners, who have this appalling orrrr sound to everything. Instead of "I spent the afternoon in Herbert Park" they say, "Ay spent the orfternoon in Horbort Pork."


Is Rachel Allen, the TV cook, from the Southside? I've often thought she has a most peculiar accent...


I think her accent is as a result of having lived in many different countries from a fairly young age. AFAIK she is from Dublin, but she spent a lot of time in England and then in Canada while she was training and working, and now she lives in Cork but bounces between there, Dublin and England for her shows.

Author:  Maeve [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
There isn't the same class differences in accent in Ireland,.


What about the Cork Montenotte accent, which I always assumed was thought to be rather posh, compared to the regular people who would say, "de paper"? Frank Hall used to have a programme on RTE in which I think he made great fun out of the various Cork accents, some of which definitely seemed class related.

Which somehow reminds me of the old joke, "Help! Help! My son the doctor is drowning!"

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Yes, you're right, Maeve, the Montenotte accent could at a stretch be called a variation of the South Dublin, though I think it's even more strangulated. Some Tipperary people have a similar accent. There may be an urrrrrr accent for Galway City too, but I'm not sure. In general though, you really can't tell rural Irish people's social background as easily as you can the English middle and upper class. Oh, and sorry, Sunglass, itis runners that are called dollies not wellies.

Author:  Róisín [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
In general though, you really can't tell rural Irish people's social background as easily as you can the English middle and upper class.


Unless you are from there (ie a rural area) and you live there, in which case, it's quite easy! :lol:

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's amazing how finely attuned to accents your ear can be when you come from the area concerned! I can (for example) tell a Bury accent from a Bolton accent, even though the places in question are only 7 miles apart, but I can't tell an accent from one part of the Home Counties from another to save my life, and I've met people from the south of England who :shock: can't tell a Lancashire accent from a Yorkshire accent.

Author:  Sarah_G-G [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
It's amazing how finely attuned to accents your ear can be when you come from the area concerned! I can (for example) tell a Bury accent from a Bolton accent, even though the places in question are only 7 miles apart, but I can't tell an accent from one part of the Home Counties from another to save my life, and I've met people from the south of England who :shock: can't tell a Lancashire accent from a Yorkshire accent.


A southerner and guilty as charged! I am marginally better at it now than before I went to university (in Sheffield) though. Interestingly enough though, a (Yorkshire) friend of mine did a survey for her linguistics coursework on the different accents in Yorkshire and Lancashire in an effort to see how good people were at identifying accents and what prejudices they had against certain accents (especially Yorkshire born and bred people against Lancashire accents and vice versa). Said survey threw up very few useful results due to the utter inability of the majority of those questioned to tell the accents apart, even to the extent of placing them in the wrong county :lol: :roll: Apparently my friend's sister, who had grown up on the border between Bradford and Halifax and had been living in Manchester for about 3 years art this point, couldn't even identify the Manchester and Bradford accents! It made me feel a little better about shocking people when I first arrived at uni by not hearing the differences between people's Sheffield, Bradford and York accents...

Moving vaguely back onto topic, I wonder how much of the avoidance of class specific vocabulary was deliberate on EBD's part and how much of it was just trying to make the "foreign-ness" of the CS more obvious. It's not something I've really looked into so I don't know how class specific other similar series are. I wonder if it could have been a way to appeal to a greater audience because the girls reading it would imagine much more easily that they could have fit in there if they couldn't quite work out where exactly on the class spectrum the CS was.

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Re the pardon/what distinction, there aren't too many GO writers who are comfortable saying the latter. EB always uses pardon, but her background is similar to EBD's. It's all very petty really, but people do notice.

Author:  Becky [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

A bit off-topic, but I have had people tell me that I couldn't possibly come from "the North" because I "sound too posh"! This really gets on my nerves.
I did modify my Northern accent slightly because I found myself having to repeat things several times when I first moved to south Wales, but I still retain it and would hate to lose it completely!

Author:  Tor [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

That type of comment is always far more telling about the comment-maker! THey usually tie themselves in knots if you politely reply "Oh really? Can you explain how you came to that conclusion?"

It works for me now that I have 'improved' my diction to the point where I get bemused surprise when I say I'm from Essex. But then the less socially-aware people tend to reply 'because you don't speak or dress like you are'. I mean really!

My accent now only really comes out when I go home, or when Isay words ending in 'al'. I find that really hard! 'Ow' is the natural sound that I make, particularly if there is an 's' on the end. After a day spent being made to stand on a stage (during training for a public-engagement event) saying 'Scale' several times over until it was deemed passable, I tend to make it sound almost welsh! But I developed such paranoia about this particular estuary trait (try asking horrible public-school types for a pint of ale when it's their round, and then being meet by huge amount of amusement by all and sundry - "What did you say? We can't understand you? etc etc and you'll get my drift), that sometimes I get all confused when concentrating really hard on not saying'ow' that I'll say something really silly like asking for a 'tail' when I want a 'towel'. Much mirth usually follows! :oops: :roll:

I can laugh about it now - my sisters and I almost died from laughing the day we found a pub with 'White Owl Pale Ale' on tap - but at 18 it was just horrendous! I wish I was the kind of person who was immune to social pressure, but I immediately start to mimic the people around me - and as I said at the beginning of this cathartic post - I am now quite posh-sounding!

Anyway, back on topic. I'm not sure it was a deliberate ploy by EBD to exclude the class factor by giving the school the foreign setting, but it really does help to improve the series I think! And maybe she was aware that the exoticism of her setting would enable her/force her to break free of her own school experiences

Author:  delrima [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Same here. When I moved (forcibly against my will) at age 9 1/2 - I lived in a dictatorship - from the North Riding to South Wales I was bullied at school for the first time in my life for "talking posh". Admittedly my parents didn't have terribly broad accents and they were slightly different as Mum was from County Durham and Dad from Manchester so perhaps they canceled each other out a bit!

Speaking of Mum, slightly OT, her growing up stories showed me another world. Grandad had a couple of grocers shops in Bishop Auckland and somewhere else, so they were "trade". They always had a maid who lived in and were just about the first local family to have a motor car. Mum went to a private school (The Mount in Bishop Auckland) which had a remarkably similar uniform to the CS - brown tunics, cream blouses, brown and cream striped tie and hatband (worn on brown velour hat in winter and blond straw in summer) and a brown/white gingham dress for summer. They also apparently had to speak foreign languages at lunchtime. It obviously didn't take much of a rise up the social ladder to land in territory which to us today seems much less accessible.

Author:  CBW [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'm originally from Essex and I always used to get the "you can't be, you sound too posh" Which I've never understood.

Everyone I was at school with had the same accent but it seens to have vanished now and an Essex accent seems to equal an estuary one. Was there some huge plague in Essex that attacked everyone who's accent didn't sound like an extra from Easternders?

Author:  Selena [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Alison H wrote:
Yseult Pertwee says "Eh?" when she doesn't hear something that Kathie says and, instead of being told to say "What?", is told to say "I beg your pardon" :shock: . I was always told that it was very rude to say "What?" rather than "Pardon?" or "Sorry?",


When I pointed this out to a 'clever' friend of mine who is very big into u non u, and who is constantly correcting others, she claimed the 'I beg' saves it. I don't think Ms Mitford would agree. I've heard Prince Charles when interviewed say , "excuse me" when he didn't hear what the interviewer was saying.


I don't think the "I beg" actually makes the slightest difference! :lol:

Next time she corrects you, you might like to point out that, according to Jilly Cooper, correcting other people's words/manners is very non-U... :wink:

MJKB wrote:

In Reunion, JOey comes up with a most extaordinary word for motorbike - mobike! I think she was hoping it might catch on.


Could she have meant a moped? If so, that's non-U anyway, it should be scooter :D

Author:  Tor [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Was there some huge plague in Essex that attacked everyone who's accent didn't sound like an extra from Easternders?


To be fair, in Estuary Essex, where there is a very large population, a lot of people do speak like that. And as with every part of the UK, there are varying degrees of accented-ness (thus at school in Essex, I was 'posh', but at uni I was definitiely common! Cant win!). But the problem isn't with the accent, but the idiots who buy into regional stereotypes.

(pitying the non-UK members who might not immediately understand the connotations of being a girl from Essex).

Obviously, the majority of the Essex population moved there in the last 50 or so years (post-war exodus of the East-End of London). Before then, and in more northerly parts of the county still is, it was quite sparsely populated. There was one 'indigenous' southern Essex man living in my road as I grew up, and he sounded , for want of a better word, much more rural/Norfolk-ish. I think he may one of the last people in that area to speak the original regional accent! North of Brentwood, it becomes less Estuary in accent, instead the London immigrants were a generally bit richer, and the accent that much posher (and its much less densly populate, with lots of flash pads/barn conversions etc!). But, I've never come across the accent of the old man who lived in my road, either.

Author:  Billie [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I never realised until I went to university that "somewhen" isn't "a real word." Or so say those who didn't grow up on the Isle of Wight. I think of "Sometime" as the equivalent of "Someplace," a viable alternative to "Somewhen" and "Somewhere," but not the one I'd naturally use.

Author:  AngelaG [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Quote:
Buchan seems to have led a life of extreme class privilege - Oxford, various colonial admin jobs, married a Grosvenor, gets made Baron Tweedsmuir, state funeral when he dies etc etc - maybe he was actually sheltered and bigoted enough to believe codswallop like 'centuries of command' and high breeding imprinting themselves biologically on the faces of the upper classes!


I don't think Buchan was rich for his whole life. He is often mentioned as the "poor son of the manse" and in the Lyttelton/Hart-Davis letters, George Lyttelton (Eton school master and father of Humphrey) writes:
Quote:
John Buchan I met once or twice and liked very much. Didn't he pay for every bit of his schooling and Oxford by scholarships and writing stories? What grit the Scots have! And with him there was none of their dourness and long upper lip. I know a good Scot who putt the weight with me at Cambridge. He was a scholar, son of a blacksmith, who never would come to the CUAC dinners because he had no evening clothes.


Plenty of class prejudices evident there, but it was written in 1956.

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
I don't think the "I beg" actually makes the slightest difference! :lol:

Next time she corrects you, you might like to point out that, according to Jilly Cooper, correcting other people's words/manners is very non-U... :wink:

I find it very annoying. There are a few words that I have difficulty in pronoucing - can't really remember many but apparently I have been known to pronounce the t in fait au complait and once I sounded the t in pret a porter and her mirth knew no bounds. I was a veritable hoot.
To return to the subject of accent denoting ones social class, it seems to me that the British class system is deeply engrained in the public's psyche. There is snobbery in Ireland and one can recognise backgound by accent but nothing to the same extent.
The schools I attended, both private convents, one a boarding school had girls from a number of rural and urban backgrounds. Among the urban girls fathers' occupations ranged from surgeons, barristers, journalists civil engineers, chartered accountants to shop owners and keepers, bank clerks and civil servants, teachers and in my case a small builder who employed the odd worker occasionaly,, and who had been at one time a clerical officer, and there was little or no variation in the way we spoke, Any difference would relate more to accent than to the use or non use of certain shibboleths.

Author:  Lottie [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
I find it very annoying. There are a few words that I have difficulty in pronoucing - can't really remember many but apparently I have been known to pronounce the t in fait au complait and once I sounded the t in pret a porter and her mirth knew no bounds. I was a veritable hoot.

According to my Oxford dictionary, the "t" should be sounded in both phrases.

Author:  Mia [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lottie wrote:
MJKB wrote:
I find it very annoying. There are a few words that I have difficulty in pronoucing - can't really remember many but apparently I have been known to pronounce the t in fait au complait and once I sounded the t in pret a porter and her mirth knew no bounds. I was a veritable hoot.

According to my Oxford dictionary, the "t" should be sounded in both phrases.


I have a French degree. I would definitely say preT a porter (you pronounce the consonant as it is followed by a vowel) but the second phrase I think you must mean fait accompli? (Though I may just not have encountered fait au complait.)

Author:  Lottie [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mia wrote:
I think you must mean fait accompli?

I assumed that was what she meant.

Author:  Emma A [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class - Accents

I find it realistic that Rosamund and Joan would have different accents, even if they were from the same town. It sounds, from what we're told about the Lilleys, that Mrs Lilley would make jolly sure that her children would speak with as little accent, and as nicely as possible, probably due to the intense negative connotations of any accent or grammatical/ syntactical variations or dialect at that time. I think we're meant to see Mrs Lilley, particularly, as "aspirational" working class (in today's terms).

People still do have negative reactions to certain accents, associating them with stereotypes, but it's far less judgmental, I'd say, than in the 1950s, where you certainly would never have had a BBC continuity announcer or presenter with a regional accent.

Because of greater mobility, people tend to have less distintive accents than in the past - mine, for example, is a foundation of fairly mild Geordie overlain with a good chunk of RP, and smidges of Irish and Scots' tendency to overpronounce Rs, as well as long residency in the south of England...

Several writer poke fun at the "gentified" accents of shopgirls or receptionists who try to ape a more refined speech - Sayers, for example, has a receptionist at the Hotel Splendid in Wilvercombe say to Harriet that "Ay have a naice room, with belcony..." and Bunter, when he is seriously angered by Mrs Ruddle's cleaning of Lord Peter's precious bottles of port, becomes considerably less refined in speech and behaviour.

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class - Accents

Emma A wrote:
Several writers poke fun at the "gentified" accents of shopgirls or receptionists who try to ape a more refined speech - Sayers, for example, has a receptionist at the Hotel Splendid in Wilvercombe say to Harriet that "Ay have a naice room, with belcony..."


Yes, if Joan's mother was a shop girl - and I assume when she says 'young lady in a shop', she does mean something a bit more upmarket than the local grocer's? - then are we to assume she had one of those effortfully genteel manners of speech, and if so, why not pass that on to Joan the way Mrs Lilley passes speaking 'prettily' onto her daughters? Or is Joan lying or genuinely misled, and in fact her mother was behind the counter of the hardware shop down the road, thereby not requiring any particular gentility...?

I agree 'aspiration' is the key to the difference between Joan and Ros's accents, but I would have thought a former shop girl (in reality, if not in EBD land, where servants have the advantage in being able to copy their employers at close range) would have been as likely, if not more so, to be aspirational, especially if she did work in, say, a dress shop.

One wonders whether Elinor (or more likely her mother? when did her mother die?) was extremely fussy about drilling 'correct' manners and speech into their servant?

Author:  andydaly [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Is Joan's accent remarked upon, come to think of it? Books are in boxes at the moment, so I can't check, but isn't it more the case that it is Joan's insolence, bad language and vulgarity that makes the girls and mistresses disapprove of her? (What does "garn" mean by the way?) And Mrs Baker was strict, to the point of being heavy handed, about her daughter's speech - there is a reference to Joan's being likely to receive a slap for bad language.

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's Rosamund's accent and grammar which are remarked on, rather than Joan. Rosamund says something about "having a lend" of the library books, rather than "borrowing" them. Admittedly that is incorrect English and a mistress would have been justified in correcting her, but it annoys me a bit when Len and Con (who were only, what, 12?) at the time exchange prim glances of dismay about it. Having said which, I have a annoying habit of moaning when people use words incorrectly, so I'd probably have done the same :oops: :lol: !

We're also told that Rosamund's Hampshire accent has more or less disappeared by the time she's been at the school for a few months: the way it's stated makes it sound as if she's been cured of some sort of disease. In fact, doesn't EBD actually refer to the school having "cured" someone of their accent or use of particular forms of speech :roll: ? It might have been Biddy or it might have been Evvy or Corney.

Joan's accent is never really mentioned. She's pulled up for swearing and rudeness, but that's fair enough!

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lottie wrote:

Post subject: Re: Themes: Class Reply with quote
Mia wrote:
I think you must mean fait accompli?


Yes, you're right, I can't think whyI wrote 'au complait'. The woman has me confused. I blame her! Why is she my friend?

Author:  hac61 [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

andydaly wrote:
(What does "garn" mean by the way?)


I've always thought it was a contraction of "go on".

(And I was taught that it was vulgar.)


hac

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think that's right about 'Garn' being 'Go on' - Eliza Doolittle (another icon of eradication of 'wrong' speech!) says it in My Fair Lady. (I think meaning something along the lines of 'Rubbish' or 'You don't expect me to believe that', which would make sense in the context Joan uses it - Betsy telling her she will be reporting herself to the Head.)

And no, Joan's accent is never remarked on, it's just that she seems to be struck, when she arrives at the CS, by Elinor Pennell's 'clear-cut well-bred voice', which she clearly finds affected, and at the same time by the change in the way Ros speaks:

Quote:
!As for that Pennell girl with her lah-di-dah voice and manners, Joan felt that she would like to say or do something really vulgar to knock her off her perch. And here was young Ros cultivating just that kind of voice! And here Joan had to stop short for Rosamund had always spoken prettily and all that was happening was that she was beginning to lose her Hampshire accent which had never been strong in any case.


To me, that implied Joan herself was aware of speaking less 'prettily' and with a stronger regional accent than Ros.

MJKB - your French pronunciation sounds considerably more accurate than your friend's.

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
MJKB - your French pronunciation sounds considerably more accurate than your friend's.


Merci bien, Sunglass, tu es tres gentille! (I hope I got that right. I resisted the temptation of looking up a tanslation on the internet!)

Sunglass wrote:
I think that's right about 'Garn' being 'Go on'

I sometimes say 'go'erthat', for 'get out of that'. I picked it up from my Cavan relations. They have some wonderfully 'different' pronunciations in that part of the world.

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Couldn't help noticing, in view of our U vs non-U discussion, that in Althea, Len uses the word 'toilets' - as far as I recall, the first time this word has been used in the series:

Quote:
“”What about washing?” she asked.
“We can do that at the station. Our train for Interlaken doesn’t come in for another hour and the waiting rooms in the station are a lot easier than the toilets on the train.”


Though does she actually mean 'toilets' as shorthand for 'toilet basins', given that the context is washing and 'toilet basins' is used a few lines down about the washing facilities at the station (and is always used of splasheries)? And if so, does that make it a U rather than a non-U usage, especially in the mouth of definitely U Len? It wouldn't occur to me, today, to say anything other than 'sink' - 'toilet basin' to me sounds like that kind of catalogue- speak that talks about 'master bedrooms' etc - but presumably something you washed your hands and cleaned your teeth in would, when EBD was writing, have been considered quite different to something you cleaned saucepans in...?

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It always makes me laugh in Jane Eyre when Mr Rochester asks Jabe to get something from his "toilet table" (dressing table) :D .

I assume she's talking about washing facilities, but would the train have had wash basins which were separate from the actual toilets?

Or maybe Althea's being very polite here, and asking about "washing" when what she actually means is that she wants to know where the toilets are, but Len's realising what she means and being terribly vulgar and using "toilets" rather than a euphemism ... :lol: :lol: .

Author:  Cat C [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Or maybe Althea's being very polite here, and asking about "washing" when what she actually means is that she wants to know where the toilets are, but Len's realising what she means and being terribly vulgar and using "toilets" rather than a euphemism ... :lol: :lol: .


I'd go with that interpretation - there's a bit in Shocks where Emerence has been sitting at the bottom of the stairs for a while, and asks if she can go and 'wash'. It must surely be a euphemism for needing the loo? And wasn't it always the standard thing to ask guests if they'd like to 'wash their hands' rather than anything else?

There are also still people who distinguish between a sink (what you'd use to wash dishes in the kitchen) and a basin (used for washing hands in the bathroom, or after using the toilet, hopefully) - if I was pushed, I would suggest a sink has a squarer shape, and a basin is 'curvier'.

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

But that would make Len (of all people!) the only person in the entire CS who actually (kind of) refers to bodily functions!!!
:shock: :) Perhaps it's just as well the series ends shortly afterwards or she'd have gone on to discuss her experiences with the mooncup or something. :wink: (Prompted by seeing a mooncup ad on the tube for the first time ever the other day...)

Author:  hac61 [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Perhaps it's just as well the series ends shortly afterwards or she'd have gone on to discuss her experiences with the mooncup or something.



What's a mooncup?

What does the U stand for in either U or non-U?



hac

I am a bear of very little brain

Author:  Tor [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
What's a mooncup?


http://www.mooncup.co.uk/

Quote:
What does the U stand for in either U or non-U?


It stands for 'Upper-class usage', and was coined by Prof. Alan Ross, a linguistics researcher in an article he wrote for a finnish academic journal in 1954. Nancy Mitford then used it as the basis for an article on the English Aristocracy, which she saw as a big 'tease' on the English, noting rightly it would get under lots of people skins! Later both were published, along with a reply by Evelyn Waugh as a book called Noblesse Oblige, which is still available.

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The only other oblique reference to the same bodily function was in Althea (Ithink). The juniors get locked in the common room because some child stuffs the lock with sawdust??? anyway, one of them tells Miss Ferris that she'd tried to leave the room because she needed to "be excused." I was quite shocked.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Imagine the response to EBD's description if, for you, "toilet basin" refers to the business part of the toilet... Since it turned out they were washing in the things, the basins must really be "bathroom sinks," but I initially pictured Splasheries with rows of the kind of toilet that has only the basin (aka bowl) showing, common in public restrooms since hidden reservoirs don't have to be cleaned every day.

Also, does the word "cloakroom" normally denote a place with plumbing in the UK? For me, cloakroom would purely be a place to stash coats, hats, snow boots, umbrellas, and (at school) things like book bags and lunch boxes. The Splasheries to me sound more like locker rooms, given their combination of plumbing and storage lockers.

Author:  Tor [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
The only other oblique reference to the same bodily function was in Althea (Ithink). The juniors get locked in the common room because some child stuffs the lock with sawdust??? anyway, one of them tells Miss Ferris that she'd tried to leave the room because she needed to "be excused." I was quite shocked.


That was in Two Sams. I was shocked too! Whoever needed to be excused was presumably desperate by the time Gaudenz broke the door down. No wonder they were all panicking!

Author:  andi [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Quote:
The only other oblique reference to the same bodily function was in Althea (Ithink). The juniors get locked in the common room because some child stuffs the lock with sawdust??? anyway, one of them tells Miss Ferris that she'd tried to leave the room because she needed to "be excused." I was quite shocked.


That was in Two Sams. I was shocked too! Whoever needed to be excused was presumably desperate by the time Gaudenz broke the door down. No wonder they were all panicking!


I always feel for that poor girl. The first person in the whole history of the Chalet School to need the loo, and she gets stuck behind a locked door!

Author:  abbeybufo [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:
Also, does the word "cloakroom" normally denote a place with plumbing in the UK? For me, cloakroom would purely be a place to stash coats, hats, snow boots, umbrellas, and (at school) things like book bags and lunch boxes. The Splasheries to me sound more like locker rooms, given their combination of plumbing and storage lockers.


Yes, Kathy - 'cloakroom' is another UK euphemism, which equates to 'bathroom' in the US [whereas a 'bathroom' in the UK doesn't necessarily have a loo in it]. My [large independent part-boarding single-sex] school in the 1960s had 'Senior' and 'Junior' cloakrooms, each of which was in two sections, about half the area taken up by rows of pegs with wire shoe lockers underneath [we had to change into indoor shoes on arrival, and again into outdoor ones for break time or any other occasion we left the building] - and half by rows of cubicles and washbasins. We were taught that the word 'toilet' was only to be used as an equivalent to the French 'toilette' as in hairdressing and make-up, not as a receptacle for the body's waste products, which if we had to mention at all should be a lavatory! The only difference between the Senior and Junior cloaks was the existence of an incinerator for used sanitary pads in the Senior - though by the time I left, one had been installed in the Junior one too, as early starters were mortified at having to take their bags down the corridor and ask the seniors permission to use the 'Bunny' [trade name]!
And quite often on an estate agent's particulars of a house, a small downstairs loo-with-washbasin will be designated 'cloaks', and public buildings will sometimes sign 'cloakrooms' instead of 'toilets' or 'Public Toilets' - which now seems to be the general term countrywide, despite the best efforts of my teachers and the 'U' brigade :lol:

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

abbeybufo wrote:
The only difference between the Senior and Junior cloaks was the existence of an incinerator for used sanitary pads in the Senior

Gosh! Your school was progressive! My sisters in the mid -late sixties were issued with little draw string bags for the disposal of the unmentionables you've just mentioned. It was the job of the lay sisters to dispose of the contents.

Author:  rainbow2009 [ Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

:witch: :popper: I like this forum
pret auto

Author:  Tor [ Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Welcome to the CBB, rainbow2009! We like it too!

Author:  singeroi [ Mon May 04, 2009 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Thanks for the info! :)
pret personnel

Author:  mohini [ Tue May 05, 2009 6:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I have not gone through whole of this discussion, but isn't there mention of training Biddy to be maid of Robin when the middles adopt her?
Also Beth works as Mother' help to Joey and later on Maria Marani also comes.
I feel there is some class distinction shown here by EDB.The Lucys' and Chesters etc were from middle or upper middle class family.
So were their children allowed to work?
Would EDB have made the Trips do the same after their education?

Author:  Alison H [ Tue May 05, 2009 6:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Vanna suggests that Biddy should be trained to be a maid to Robin. Joey tells her it's a silly idea, but only because Ted Humphries wouldn't have been able to afford to employ a maid for his daughter. She then adds that, yes, it would seem sensible for Biddy to go into service.

Beth is a sort of au pair, and her sister Nancy becomes a nurse.

I'm not for a minute saying that there's anything wrong with being an au pair, but it seems an unusual thing to do with an Oxford degree, unless it's just for a year or two to improve your language skills which doesn't seem to apply with Beth.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue May 05, 2009 9:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

But then everybody is very surprised that Beth, with her looks, isn't at least engaged yet. Maybe she wanted to come back into contact with lots of doctors who could save her life...

Author:  Sunglass [ Tue May 05, 2009 11:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've always thought it's a slightly odd thing for a recent Oxford graduate to do (and I say this as an ex-au pair myself) - given that EBD is still writing a fictional world where going on to further education or training of any kind isn't automatic, and where Beth would presumably have only gone on to university if she felt strongly about what she was studying...? Nursery governess at Freudesheim seems a bit of a strange step to take.

I note that no one else seems to be surprised that she's not pursuing some kind of career to do with her degree (or why she doesn't simply stay at home?) only that she isn't yet married (which I have to say I find absolutely maddening, especially as spoken by the attractive and apparently happily single Rosalie Dene)... Possibly we're supposed to get that an interval at Freudesheim is a Wonderful Opportunity for a Girl (all that fresh air, all those doctors and languages) rather than wondering why a highly-educated young woman from a socially impeccable background is lugging Joey's offpspring about the Platz? I'm similarly surprised when Maria Marani plans to take up the same job.

I always think the 'untold' bit of the Biddy story is terribly interesting. As a servant's child, she's classed initially as a proto-servant herself, and sent to the humble local school, despite being adopted by a superior school - it doesn't seem to occur to anyone to educate her at the CS until, presumably, the local school teacher tells someone she's academically clever, and she's bumped up a social level by being admitted to the CS. Whereupon, presumably, the idea of her training as a maid is quietly dropped. Imagine it from the point if view of a ten or twelve year old - one minute you're at a German-language school with peasant children who will spend their lives doing manual work, doing very basic literacy and numeracy, and you're told you're going to be taught hair-dressing etc with the idea of being a maid, and the next, you're in a CS blazer doing Latin declensions among upper-class girls whose families employ maids...

Author:  JB [ Tue May 05, 2009 11:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mohini wrote:

Quote:
I feel there is some class distinction shown here by EDB.The Lucys' and Chesters etc were from middle or upper middle class family.
So were their children allowed to work?


The Chester children would have needed to work - they were a large family who, relatively speaking, weren't that well off. The Lucys were much better off - I think there's a mention in the La Rochelle books that, although Julian has a private income, he chooses to work. I would imagine he'd feel the same way about his children. And, again, they're a large family.

I doubt there'd be a question of the girls being "allowed to work" by the 1950s, although the expectation would have been that they'd work until they married eg Julie Lucy wants to become a barrister but marries before she qualifies.

Author:  Cat C [ Tue May 05, 2009 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The Chesters were always, relatively (sorry) speaking, the 'poor relations' in the Lucy-Chester-Ozanne clan, but I think really EBD wanted a vaaguely plausible way of getting Beth onto the platz to escort Barbara there ahead of term. She was also supposed to be teaching some of the younger Maynards before they were shipped off to school, which seems a nod to acknowledging her academic qualifications... although even then, as a new graduate, one might see it as a sort of gap year while she had a think about what to do next.

In terms of class, I tend to think of Lady Diana Spencer working as a nursary nurse before her prince came along!

Author:  Sunglass [ Tue May 05, 2009 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Cat C wrote:
In terms of class, I tend to think of Lady Diana Spencer working as a nursery nurse before her prince came along!


Mind you, she had only a single O-level, didn't she? And a star for hamster care, or something.

Author:  Cat C [ Tue May 05, 2009 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Cat C wrote:
In terms of class, I tend to think of Lady Diana Spencer working as a nursery nurse before her prince came along!


Mind you, she had only a single O-level, didn't she? And a star for hamster care, or something.


True, true, but the aristocracy have always considered themselves more entitled to everything, included eccentric behaviour than the rest of us, so even if she'd been a Nobel prize-winning member of the Royal Society, I think she could have done it...

Author:  MJKB [ Tue May 05, 2009 4:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Cat C wrote:
Cat C wrote:
In terms of class, I tend to think of Lady Diana Spencer working as a nursery nurse before her prince came along!



I always think of the hyperbole of the British press when Diana first came on the scene.The Sun (I think) claimed that she could have taken up any career she chose but gave it all up to marry Charles! Bingo, a couple of years later she's photographed in full make-up in an operating theatre.

Author:  JS [ Fri May 08, 2009 1:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Am re-reading The Lost Staircase (thanks to, I think, Nightwing, who was talking about reading it for the first time). I note that Sir Ambrose has a 'high bred' face and 'artistocratic fingers' (which sounds a bit creepy) and that the new doctor remarks to his pretty (of course!) wife that they are: 'Patricians every one of them - master, heiress and dogs'.

Also, it occurs to me that Jesanne's 'baby cottage' which she gets as a Christmas present is probably about the same size as my (grown-up, thank you very much) house!

Author:  MJKB [ Fri May 08, 2009 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've heard talk about the 'hands of a priest' and the 'hands of a surgeon', but 'fingers of an aristocrat' - well........I agree, JS, it sounds distinctly creepy.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sat May 09, 2009 5:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
note that no one else seems to be surprised that she's not pursuing some kind of career to do with her degree (or why she doesn't simply stay at home?) only that she isn't yet married (which I have to say I find absolutely maddening, especially as spoken by the attractive and apparently happily single Rosalie Dene)...


But then Rosalie's generation of men fought in the War and their would be a number of females not able to marry as a result as their weren't enough males to go around. And who knows if Rosalie had loved someone who then later died in the War or ended up being on the other side so to speak. That could explain, why Rosalie can't understand why Beth who doesn't have the same problem isn't married

Author:  Loryat [ Wed May 13, 2009 6:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD is not the only author to harbour the offensive idea that you can tell a person's class just by looking at them. It's a trend you can see throughout the nineteenth century and probably before as well as in 20th c. fiction.

Little do they realise that to us high bred just means chinless... :evil:

Author:  Cat C [ Wed May 13, 2009 6:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think the trouble is that we all do judge by appearances, at least initally, including all the sorts of things that are a choice (clothes, hair style...) - and for a long time you could tell by looking at someone what class they were - suntan and rough peasant hands etc for those who did physical labour.

Quite apart from all that stuff about phrenology, it wouldn't have seemed all that strange to EBD, I wouldn't have thought, that you could tell someone's breeding by just looking at them.

Author:  MJKB [ Thu May 14, 2009 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Cat C wrote:
Quite apart from all that stuff about phrenology, it wouldn't have seemed all that strange to EBD, I wouldn't have thought, that you could tell someone's breeding by just looking at them.


I agree, and it isn't meant to be offensive, it's just of its time. Much of it had to do with air, attitude, dress, confidence etc. There's little doubt that wealth, particularly 'old money' confers confidence and self assurance on its owners. Also, frankness about differences in social class was as normal to EBD, I'm sure, as sexual frankness is to many writers today.
Cat C wrote:
I think the trouble is that we all do judge by appearances, at least initally, including all the sorts of things that are a choice (clothes, hair style...)

There's still quite a bit of truth in that today, witness the Essex girl phenonomeon in the UK and the North side/South side divide in Dublin in terms of general appearance. Also, in large community/comprehensive schools, adolescents dress and make up in ways that indicate the group to which they belong. In my daughter's school (1100 pupils) there are the D4s, (very small and exclusive), the Populars (very loud and offensive), the Boggers (from out the country, therefore very plain, solid types), the Rockers (horrible make up but inclusive), and so on.

Author:  Nightwing [ Thu May 14, 2009 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

JS wrote:
Am re-reading The Lost Staircase (thanks to, I think, Nightwing, who was talking about reading it for the first time). I note that Sir Ambrose has a 'high bred' face and 'artistocratic fingers' (which sounds a bit creepy) and that the new doctor remarks to his pretty (of course!) wife that they are: 'Patricians every one of them - master, heiress and dogs'.


I was pretty impressed with EBD's portrayal of a NZ girl dealing with suddenly becoming aristocracy! I love Jesanne's reaction to having a maid coming to dress her and other, various little things which showed she had no idea about how to handle 'old world manners' and the British class system.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu May 14, 2009 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Loryat wrote:
EBD is not the only author to harbour the offensive idea that you can tell a person's class just by looking at them. It's a trend you can see throughout the nineteenth century and probably before as well as in 20th c. fiction.:


I do also personally find it fairly offensive, but also agree that it is of its time, and that EBD is only conforming to a widespread convention, rather than inventing it off her own bat. I think we've had this discussion further up on this thread, or somewhere else on the board, but I don't actually think that when she talks about people's 'high-bred' appearance, she is just referring to the absence of things like rough hands or tans from outdoor work, or to external things like dress and self-presentation as class markers. She mentions that kind of external thing when Joey and co are disguised as the world's least convincing peasants when escaping from the Gestapo - that their hands and nails are a giveaway - but I think she, like not a few writers of her day and earlier, genuinely thinks the upper and lower classes do look inherently different.

She makes it clear, for instance, that despite the fact that Gay Lambert when running away is wearing an ancient raincoat and beret, her 'high-bred little face' means she could never be mistaken for a 'cottage girl', despite her old clothes. OK, other factors also enter in, like the way she moves and her voice, but I think that here and elsewhere, she does suggest actual physical differences due to 'breeding', with lower class people having coarser features! (Or, of course, being 'cheaply pretty' (poor Joan), though I wouldn't have said that EBD, with her horror of bubblebath etc, would have thought that 'expensively pretty' was an accolade either!)

Although in Headgirl, she seems to suggest that the graceful walks of Joey, Grizel and Miss Maynard are due, not to their breeding, but to continual practice of English folk dances, which always makes me giggle, as I tend to imagine them bobbing about rhythmically...

Loryat wrote:
Little do they realise that to us high bred just means chinless... :evil:

:D

Author:  MJKB [ Thu May 14, 2009 7:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
her 'high-bred little face'

I wonder what she means by that, what cast of features, for instance, signified, breeding to EBD and like minded people. When it's put baldly like that it does rather shock.
As I've already said on the board, people who are used to having money tend to be more confident and sure of themselves and this sometimes translates into what we call 'classy' nowadays. And there are people who have a distinguished air about them, which again I associate with the confidence wealth brings. That's not to say that there aren't plently of examples of distinguished looking people who have come from very deprived back grounds.
Jilly Cooper makes the claim in Class that upper class people are generally taller than the other social classes, and scientists also claim that the generations are growing taller due to better food and conditions, in the West anyway. (I'd welcome affirmation or otherwise of the above claim.) When I was younger I found this quite insulting as I'm barely 5' tall. I may have read this while reading Brave New World and worried about looking like some sort of gamma or beta!

Author:  Emma A [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Jilly Cooper makes the claim in Class that upper class people are generally taller than the other social classes, and scientists also claim that the generations are growing taller due to better food and conditions, in the West anyway. (I'd welcome affirmation or otherwise of the above claim.) When I was younger I found this quite insulting as I'm barely 5' tall. I may have read this while reading Brave New World and worried about looking like some sort of gamma or beta!

I don't know about the upper classes being taller, but it makes sense, since they would, historically, have been better fed than the toiling masses. Nutrition is definitely linked to height, although obviously there is a genetic component in there too. I've seen this phenomenon, particularly in women, and particularly in Newcastle. You often see families in town together - grandmother, mother and daughter - and it's routine to see a gradation in height from the short elderly woman to her much taller grand-daughter. I don't think it's as noticeable in men.

Apparently the Dutch are the tallest people in the Western world, and I can believe that - almost every Dutch person I've met (and I work for a Dutch firm) feels like they're a head taller than me - and I'm about 5'6".

Author:  MJKB [ Fri May 15, 2009 9:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emma A wrote:
although obviously there is a genetic component in
What is that genetic component and how can I get it?
To be serious, what is the correlation between social class and height? And how significant is the genetic componet?
Having just finished my comment on this board yesterday evening I started thinking about all the heroines of Go literature, including American 19th century. I couldn't come up with one small/petite heroine. Anyone care to comment on that.

Author:  Tor [ Fri May 15, 2009 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Yes, the best way to think about it is that everyone has a genetic 'potential' to reach a certain height, but will only do so if they receive adequate nutrition along the way. However, as there will always be genetic variation, there will also always be height variation even if everyone in the world has the same access to food.

there is clear evidence, for example, from 1st generation immigrants from 3rd world to 1st world countries, that they are significantly taller than their parents. This is at odds with (i think) Galton's work which showed offspring (of parents from the same environment) to be intermediate in height to their parents: he drew a line through the data to explain the 'regressive' nature of the data, and hence we get the term regression.

However, claims like those made by Jilly Cooper, are not - i am sure - referring to some kind of lower-class stunting, but instead reflecting the same set of ideas as the 'high-bred face'.

I know we talked about this earlier on this thread, but my biggest problem with phrases like 'high-bred little face' and various ridiculous assertions by Jilly Cooper about class differences, are the accompanying sense of them being superior to 'lower class' features. I could just about buy that there will be identifying characteristics of non-mixing social groups, as for a long time lack of social mobility meant that people rarely married outside of their neighbouring village, let alone social class (although for this to really hold true, there would have to be no shenanigans between above and below stairs, and I think we can say that is unlikely.... social boarders may have been rigid, but I'm not sure reproductive boarders are!!!).

Quote:
To be serious, what is the correlation between social class and height? And how significant is the genetic componet?


I doubt there is one. If there was, I'd say it would be a very loose correlation. But if I wanted to give the idea the benefit of the doubt, I would say it *could* reflect a secondary correlation between ethnicity and social social status. For example, you could argue that, in the UK, a number of our aristocracy descend from Germanic and Dutch (House of Hanover/Orange etc) lineages, and both these nationalities are though of a above average in height. In Holland, I doubt their royal family is any taller than the average....?

Author:  Alison H [ Fri May 15, 2009 9:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've certainly seen plenty of statistics showing that people are gradually getting taller over the generations because of better food.

Engels makes various comments in The Condition of the Working Classes in England about working-class people being smaller (and darker, which he seems to have a problem with for some reason!) than better-off people. His comments about height might make some sense in the context of Victorian times, given that better off people would have been better fed, were it not for the fact that Queen Victoria herself was only about 5' tall!

Author:  MJKB [ Fri May 15, 2009 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
I've certainly seen plenty of statistics showing that people are gradually getting taller over the generations because of better food.

So there is a correlation between wealth, which invariably translates into social class, and height. Therefore one could say that there is something of a stigma about being small. Height is regarded in our society as desirable, and I think I even read somewhere that there is a link between height and professional success - I'm very vague on that.

Author:  Emma A [ Fri May 15, 2009 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Having just finished my comment on this board yesterday evening I started thinking about all the heroines of Go literature, including American 19th century. I couldn't come up with one small/petite heroine. Anyone care to comment on that.

I think it's because, until recently, the vast majority of the population weren't tall, and having a tall heroine would signify her difference from the norm in a very easy and simple way. It might also be simple wish fulfilment on the part of the author! Of course, sometimes a character's height isn't really mentioned, for example, the Swallows and Amazons.

Nicola Marlow isn't tall, but I can't really think of anyone else. Joey, Mary-Lou, Anne Shirley, Katy Carr, Jo March, et alia are all tall, aren't they?

Author:  trig [ Fri May 15, 2009 5:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's quite true that people in general are getting taller. You only have to visit an old National Trust property and not be able to get through the doors to realise this (I'm only 5' 4). Suits of armour for knights (upper class, surely) were on average only 5'4.

I've only a totally unscientific investigation to back this up, but I'm pretty sure today's children are much bigger than we were! As a maths teacher I'm forever doing surveys in classes on shoe size, height etc, and even the Year 7s now (11 year olds) are averaging size 6 for girls and 7 for boys.

I have to say that there is some link between height (and IQ) and social class. I did a genetics degree and my thesis was on twin studies where the (identical) twins had been separated at birth for adoption. Any differences in their adult measures of height, IQ etc must be down to environmental issues. Those in ABC1 (upper class) groups had on average a superior IQ of 5 points and a superior height of 10cm to those in C2DE (mostly manual labour/unemployed etc). This shocked me as I thought IQ was a measure of intrinsic intelligence rather than of the surroundings but I suppose you can't separate the two.

Author:  MaryR [ Fri May 15, 2009 5:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

trig wrote:
This shocked me as I thought IQ was a measure of intrinsic intelligence rather than of the surroundings but I suppose you can't separate the two.

As part of my BEd, I studied IQ testing in the psychology course and part of it was devising an IQ test. We discovered just how hard that is, as almost every question we came up with tested what education, reading, environment etc had given to the person being tested, not pure IQ at all. So it doesn't surprise me, Trig, that twins raised differently would produce different scores.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri May 15, 2009 6:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

As part of our psychology course we had to look at the limitations of IQ tests, and also the 8 multiple intelligences, which is supposed to be fairer, but is still influenced by environment. The sad truth is that while education isn't completely fair there's going to be nothing that can change some people's IQs not being fully realised, I think.

Author:  Loryat [ Fri May 15, 2009 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

What I was mainly thinking about when I posted before, though I didn't have time to say so, was in Frankenstein where (I can't remember the exact details) a fisher family take in some nobleman's child for some reason and then Frankenstein's family meet them and realise that of course the adopted child isn't of peasant stock because she looks totally different and her aristocratic heritage is plain in her face blah blah blah. And in that case it's nothing to do with feeding, bearing, accent because she's been brought up by the same people!

Also, in a novel by Elizabeth Goudge, who was writing at the same time as EBD more or less, there is a girl brought up by some farmers who was rescued from a watery grave and came from aristocratic stock originally, and the book is full of bits where various characters reflect on how this child can't possibly have come from farmer stick and her adopted parents can't even understand her character (because they are not on the same plane).

This sort of thing really annoys me.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri May 15, 2009 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

From 'Frankenstein':

Quote:
The four others were dark-eyed, hardly little vagrants; this child was thin and very fair. Her hair was the brightest living gold, and despite the poverty of her clothing, seemed to set a crown of distinction on her head. Her brow was clear and ample, her blue eyes cloudless, and her lips and the moulding of her face so expressive of sensibility and sweetness that none could behold her without looking on her as of a distinct species, a being heaven-sent, and bearing a celestial stamp in all her features.


Shelley does seem to make it clear that there is a distinction between the four children and Elizabeth, but because she is so clearly differently coloured etc. Also, she does write Frankenstein as being very admiring of good looks, and, the way that she writes his story, his parents tell him that Elizabeth will be 'his little angel' (to paraphrase) and so looking back he might be inclined to exaggerate things more than they are.

That being said, he is clearly drawing a distinction, perhaps an unfair one.

Sorry, we studied it for coursework a couple of months ago :oops:

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

[quote="Loryat"]Also, in a novel by Elizabeth Goudge, who was writing at the same time as EBD more or less, there is a girl brought up by some farmers who was rescued from a watery grave and came from aristocratic stock originally, and the book is full of bits where various characters reflect on how this child can't possibly have come from farmer stick and her adopted parents can't even understand her character (because they are not on the same plane).[quote]

I can understand interests such as a love of reading or music that may not necessarily be shared by the adoptive family but not so much as character which seems to be based more on upbringing than anything else

Author:  MJKB [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Environmental factors are, naturally (no pun intended), hugely significant in IQ measurement. Interestingly in Ireland, the only marginalised minority who measure significantly higher in numeracy than literacy are the traveller community. This makes alot of sense because from an early age they are more likely to be involved in business dealings where quickness in arithmatic is crucial for their survival. Sorry for putting it so simplistically.

Author:  bobtom115 [ Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Hi guys, Im a newbie. Nice to join this forum. :roll:

pret personnel

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Welcome to the board and for your first post bobtom115 :D

Author:  Jennie [ Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The 'Lost Child' shining out from her humble background, only to be revealed as coming from noble/royal stock has been around for as long as people have been writing/ story-telling.

Remember Perdita in 'The Winter's Tale'? Shakespeare was using that as a plot device long ago.

Author:  MJKB [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Jane Austen distinguished between birth, wealth and understanding. In Emma the heroine is clearly flawed in uderstanding although she has both wealth and breeding. Jane Fairfax, on the other hand, has undersatnding but has no wealth and has no birthright. Austen appears to give priority to undertstanding over birth and wealth, yet when Emma thinks that Mr' Knightly is in love with Jane she appears genuinely concerned about how degrading a match it will be for him

Author:  Jennie [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've just been reading Alcott's 'An Old-Fashioned Girl' and that has quite a few trenchant points to make about the gentility of the heart as set against the snobbery that springs from having money.

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

trig wrote:
It's quite true that people in general are getting taller. You only have to visit an old National Trust property and not be able to get through the doors to realise this (I'm only 5' 4). Suits of armour for knights (upper class, surely) were on average only 5'4.


Well... people were only a smidgeon shorter then. Doors were certainly shorter, but this was partly achitectural and partly, when you're looking at some ground-level buildings, due to the floor level being higher now than it was originally.

Height has a very large genetic component, the remainder of the variation being due as others have said to nutrition and disease. You see a marked decrease in height (and robustness) in archaeological skeletons when people moved from being nomadic hunter-gatherers to settling in towns. And then the Anglo-Saxons were about the same height, on average, as British people today, but average heights declined slightly over the middle ages, hitting a low during the Industrial Revolution when poor nutrition and disease were most extreme.

Sorry, simultaneously wearing biology and history hats :D

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

This is really interesting. I think I know the answer to this question but I'll ask it anyway. Was the decrease in height during the Middle Ages spread across the socio economic divide?
I have a vague recollection of a study conducted some years ago on the impact of the flood of American food outlets in Japan after WW2. There was a slight increase in height and a bigger increase in weight, neither of which was considered favourably by the Japanese.

Author:  andydaly [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
This is really interesting.


Plus me - I love hearing information like this! Thanks Rrose Selavy!

Author:  Chelsea [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Clare Mallory's League of the Smallest has some small heroines.

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Good to hear, because I can't think of any small heroines apart, from the sickly Fanny in Mansfield Park.

Author:  andydaly [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
the sickly Fanny in Mansfield Park.


Elinor Dashwood wasn't tall either - when Austen is contrasting the sisters' appearance, she describes Marianne's figure as being more striking in "having the advantage of height".

Author:  Chelsea [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Good to hear, because I can't think of any small heroines apart, from the sickly Fanny in Mansfield Park.


It's basically about little people (as in smaller than average, not as in midgets) getting overlooked, so they form their own "league" to prove that they can do worthwhile things.

Rather a nice read, actually.

Being 5'2" (if standing very, very straight), I could relate.

Author:  Emsnan [ Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

What a great site! I've spent the last couple of hours reading it. So pleased to find a Chalet site like this. I've already found the Antonia Forest one so now I only want a Monica Edwards one and I'll be made!!

Going way back to the Biddy O'Ryan/Irish accent, if I may, I always thought the point EBD was trying to get across was that it wasn't so much the accent (unless it was really broad) but more what was actually said. Biddy's Irish WAY of speaking "oi, 'tis not roight, at all, at all" was, in that specialist school of languages, what the staff were trying to tone down. With accents abounding, I don't think they minded the Irish/Scottish lilt, or the Hampshire accent any more than the "gutteral German" and all the other accents they must have had.

The same with Joan - I always thought she probably spoke in a "rough" way, such as leaving the "t's" off the ends of words and that sort of thing. I never felt they would have minded the accent so much. I was always brought up to understand that speaking "roughly" or non-grammatically ('I done that', rather than 'I did that' or 'I ain't got none') marked you out as "common". An accent didn't do that on its own at all.

By the way, slightly OT but not entirely, I have just read in the Radio Times that Tim Henman started off in the 70's, I think it was, as one of the 25% tallest tennis players at 6' 1". Now he's in the 25% shortest range! Shows how men have grown anyway!

Author:  abbeybufo [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Welcome to the CBB Emsnan - the Monica Edwards site is here - though it isn't as comprehensive as this one :D

Author:  CBW [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Hi

Can you post a link to the Antonia Forest Site please.

Author:  abbeybufo [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

There's this one but it's front page doesn't seem very up-to-date - still trailing the 2006 conference. Have you a better link Emsnan?

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emsnan wrote:
Going way back to the Biddy O'Ryan/Irish accent, if I may, I always thought the point EBD was trying to get across was that it wasn't so much the accent (unless it was really broad) but more what was actually said. Biddy's Irish WAY of speaking "oi, 'tis not roight, at all, at all" was, in that specialist school of languages, what the staff were trying to tone down. With accents abounding, I don't think they minded the Irish/Scottish lilt, or the Hampshire accent any more than the "gutteral German" and all the other accents they must have had.


But calling an accent 'broad' is in itself a value judgement. I mean, everyone has an accent (though there do seem to be people who believe they don't!) - I have one, the Queen has one, Ray Winstone has one, Sean Connery has one. Whether you rank a particular accent as desirable or prestigious or not says more about where the perceiver is coming from personally, and the particular class bias etc of the time period. These days, I gather people with Scottish accents are chosen for call centres because they are widely thought to sound trustworthy, but in EBD's time Clem still remarks on the 'funny' accents of the island she and her parents live on, and remarks that 'even the minister' (who is presumably middle-class and should therefore speak RP) speaks like that - ie 'wrongly', from the POV of Clerm, who presumably speaks RP, even if her parents are bohemian artists.

Obviously, EBD is very much of her era, in which regional accents or anything other than the RP and 'clear, cultured tones' Elinor Pennell speaks in, were considered a social hindrance - but of course Elinor Pennell had just as much of an accent as Ros Lilley or Joan Baker, just one that EBD, like the Establishment of her day, approved, rather than disapproved of. And I think you can't really extricate accent from dialect - is leaving the final 'g' sound off words ending in 'ing' a matter of accent or dialect?

I do think that wanting the non-native English speakers to learn the most prestigious form of the language would have made sense in the CS time period, fair enough. It would have done, say, Simone or Gisela no favours to have picked up Biddy O'Ryan's Hiberno-English, which would have been widely despised - mine still does me no favours in certain upper-class situations in this country!

But the regular ticking off of Biddy for her speech, and Miss Ferrars rebuking Samantha for sounding American still grates on me, even though I know it's of its time, and you can't realistically expect EBD to write outside her period. (Fairly sure she'd have disapproved of regional accents in broadcasting...)

And of course we only ever see CS speakers of English being rebuked for the way they speak their native language - or should we imagine Mademoiselle Lepattre rebuking speakers of non-prestigious French dialects, or Herr Anserl ticking someone off for sounding too Swabian?!

Author:  trig [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Quote:
And of course we only ever see CS speakers of English being rebuked for the way they speak their native language - or should we imagine Mademoiselle Lepattre rebuking speakers of non-prestigious French dialects, or Herr Anserl ticking someone off for sounding too Swabian?!



I always imagined until I was well into my teens that all French or German people spoke the same... I remember being puzzled by EBD's mentions of patois when they are fleeing the Nazi's in Exile.

I expect EBD just wasn't attuned to the snob-value of accents in France or Germany. Apparently Breton accents are as broad (and often despised) to Parisien French as Irish or Welsh are to Londoners.

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
or anything other than the RP and 'clear, cultured tones' Elinor Pennell speaks in,


If it was anything like the type of squeaky voice you hear in newsreels of the day it must have been 'too terrably terrably' irritating! I'm sure it brought out the very worst in JOan Baker and made her want to shock the likes of Elinor with some choice vulgarity.
I think some accents areeasier on the ear than others. There are some very ugly sounding English and Irish accents.

Author:  andi [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

abbeybufo wrote:
There's this one but it's front page doesn't seem very up-to-date - still trailing the 2006 conference. Have you a better link Emsnan?


The link to the Trennels forum on livejournal is http://community.livejournal.com/trennels

Author:  Loryat [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think in EBD's eyes a lilt to your tones was seen as acceptable but you must propnounce words the same way as everyone else. For example I just read the GGB ed of Gay and there was Bill telling Fiona off for her bad English, even though it was grammatically correct (unlike Biddy's, I suppose you could say). Fiona's problem is using p for b and ss for s.

I think it's interesting that despite years of nagging even the adult Biddy who is ultra-respectable and a lesser CS icon has a touch of 'Kerry brogue'. Considering EBD seemed to want Biddy to lose it (otherwise why all the nagging?) it's funny that Biddy rebelled.

I think leaving gs off the ends of words, or dropping ts, is a feature of people's accents. For example I don't speak with an extremely strong Scottish accent but I actually find it quite hard to pronounce all those gs and ts.

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
I think some accents are easier on the ear than others. There are some very ugly sounding English and Irish accents.


But isn't that quite a personal judgement for a hearer, rather than anything objective? I'm sure that if you got ten people to rank ten accents from Cork to Cardiff via Canterbury, you'd get ten different 'Ugliest' and 'Most Attractive'. I know I'm personally biased against a certain kind of trad upper-class Home Counties bark because I associate it with Tory philistinism and crassness. And for some English people my accent is a charming 'lilt', while for others (often the Home Counties barkers), the exact same accent is a bog 'brogue' with associations of backwardness, fecklessness and pigs in the kitchen.

Author:  Kate [ Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I agree, Sunglass. My dad used to insist that he had a generic Irish accent but to my Dublin friends, he sounded incomprehensible. Actually he had a very strong South Galway accent. I have a slighter South Galway accent, which I'm sure is unpleasant to some people but nice to others. I'd be very offended if anyone suggested I change it to sound nicer.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I can understand the insisting on toning down accents in some cases simply because some are impossible to understand. When I first went to the UK I couldn't understand a lot of people due to there accents but then a lot couldn't understand mine either :D so it cuts both ways. (Though I did think I spoke normally and they were the ones who spoke weirdly :lol: Each to what your used to). I did find as I lost my accent I did end up with a kind of non-accent. I do find Europeans tend to speak English with an accent from whomever they learnt it from. I remember travelling through Scotland with some Germans who spoke it with an American accent because their English teacher was American.

In regards to Biddy refusing to give up her accent, good on her. it was probably all she had left from her family

Author:  CBW [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I can understand the insisting on toning down accents in some cases simply because some are impossible to understand.


The last place I worked we had some student work placments.

One year we had 1 from the East End of London, 1 from Newcastle and 1 from New York. They supposedly spoke the same language but we ended up having to provide translators for the first couple of weeks because they simply couldn't understand each other.

Author:  Alison H [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Didn't they provide subtitles when Susan Boyle was interviewed on an American chat show recently :roll: ?

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
I know I'm personally biased against a certain kind of trad upper-class Home Counties bark because I associate it with Tory philistinism and crassness.


It's the sound of some accents that I find grating rather than the place they are associated with. I have several friends from Cork and Kerry and most of them have very pleasing lilting voices, to my ear anyway, but one has a very guttural sound which is very hard to listen to. She pronounces sandwich 'sangwidge' and brilliant 'brillant' and there's a sort of banshee quality to her voice. She's one of my closest collegues and I'm very fond of her but I do find her accent unpleasant.

Alison H wrote:
Didn't they provide subtitles when Susan Boyle was interviewed on an American chat show recently :roll: ?
Didn't they provide subtitles when Susan Boyle was interviewed on an American chat show recently :roll: ?

The first time I went to West Cork I didn't understand one word the locals said, although I actually loved the sound of the words.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I have a friend from manchester who hates her accents with a passion, yet in America they love it and thinks it sounds great. I guess a lot of things foreign sounds exotic and so is liked more

Author:  Miss Di [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

My cousin's husband is from Liverpool by way of Ireland and even after 20 years here I find him very difficult to understand! Saying "Pardon?" after every sentence gets embarrassing!

(I of course do not have an accent but most of the rest of you do :twisted: )

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Fiona Mc wrote:
I have a friend from Manchester who hates her accents with a passion, yet in America they love it and thinks it sounds great. I guess a lot of things foreign sounds exotic and so is liked more


Ooh, how could she hate our luvvly accent :lol: ?

I've found that a lot of people in America like north of England accents - not sure why, but that's what I've found! I like Deep South American accents :D .

One thing I found surprising was that in Quebec City and Montréal a lot of the French-speaking people couldn't tell an English accent from an Anglophone-Canadian accent, but I suppose it's always hard to tell different accent aparts in another language.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Despite being half-Scottish I struggle so much to understand the Scottish accent - even my dad gets "Sorry?" every few sentences :oops: I love the Irish accent (Ed Byrne particularly has a *gorgeous* accent) but I hate my own. I want elocution lessons.

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I do feel rather cheated that I've lost a lot of what I would class as my 'native' accent since I left home. Though I am quite pleased that that I speak Spanish with a slight Canarian accent & appropriate dialect (thanks to my flatmate, who is very proud of her achievement but laughs at me if I start sounding Cuban...)

I have to say that there are areas of the country where I wouldn't want to bring up a child purely because I detest the accent, but I'm not going to name any names :lol:

Author:  Kirsty [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Didn't they provide subtitles when Susan Boyle was interviewed on an American chat show recently :roll: ?


I remember watching an American show (The Amazing Race? - it was one where pairs of Americans had to get from one point to another & doing weird challenges along the way, the last one to the finish each week got eliminated), and one of the places they travelled through was Outback Australia, and I laughed myself silly when the locals speech was all subtitled - I didn't think our accent was that hard to follow... :D

That being said, I was also "warned" by a friendly shop assistant that I may not enjoy the TV show "Hamish Macbeth" as the accents were really strong & hard to understand - I never had any problems following teh show at all though!

Author:  Emsnan [ Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Yes, I did know about that Monica Edwards site but I was hoping there might be another one more like this one. The Antonia Forest site I use is the same as andi's - http://community.livejournal.com/trennels which is super.

Back to the accent discussion - I have to say I still think there is a difference between a regional accent and an ungrammatical way of speaking but perhaps that's more to do with my generation. Any accent can be difficult to understand if you're not used to it - anyone who moves house to a completely different area will probably have found that out. And the early BBC accents are just as incomprehensible to our ears. EBD was a woman of her time and background - let's face it, practically the whole ethos of the CS is indicative of that. We either accept it and love it - in spite of everything - or we don't read the books!

Author:  CBW [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Back to the accent discussion - I have to say I still think there is a difference between a regional accent and an ungrammatical way of speaking but perhaps that's more to do with my generation.


I recently had a hellish journey on the M25 while my mother and daughter argued over whether or not it was good English to use 'access' as a verb. By the time we got to the Clacket Lane Services I was ready to ram it just to shut them up.

Incidentally ,thanks for the Antonia Forest links.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Back to the accent discussion - I have to say I still think there is a difference between a regional accent and an ungrammatical way of speaking but perhaps that's more to do with my generation.


My point about Biddy and Samantha being rebuked for the way they speak is that they are speaking their own dialects of English correctly - there are various US vs UK English differences in grammar and syntax, though I don't know a great deal about them (and I'm not entirely convinced EBD did either) - things like 'different to' vs 'different than' or 'at the back of' vs' in back of' etc. Maybe some US member of the board could suggest whether 'somewheres' is a regional US term?

Quote:
Miss Ferrars frowned. “Not ‘somewheres’, Samantha. We don’t say that in English. It’s ‘somewhere’ without the s.” Samantha blushed. “I guess I’m real American at times, Miss Ferrars. It don’t really matter, surely? Some day I’ll be going home and then I want to talk like other folks.”

Miss Ferrars laughed. “It all depends on where you live. I know that in Boston, for instance, the English is as pure as anywhere in England itself. It’s more the accent and intonation that differ. Yes, Samantha. I think it does matter that you should speak correctly. Do your best with it, anyhow. Remember, both of you, that one reason for your being here is that you may learn to speak all of our three languages properly.


But whatever about 'somewheres', Miss Ferrars is being pretty culturally insulting, I think, to tell a native English speaker that 'we don't say that in English', that only a small part of her native country speaks 'pure' English, and that she's come to the school to learn to speak all three of its languages 'properly', even though one of them is Samantha's mothertongue!

As regards Biddy, she's speaking standard Hiberno-English, which has lots of phonemic variations from standard British English, and derives some of its syntax from the Irish language. Some of Biddy's speech as EBD writes it is stage-Irish nonsense, but some of it is reasonably accurate Hiberno-English. Irish has no words for 'yes' and 'no', so you have Biddy saying 'I am' or 'I am not'/'It is'/'It isn't' in response to questions which would get a yes/no response in UK English. Irish doesn't have a pluperfect tense, and Hiberno-English uses 'after' to replicate the kinds of compond prepositions you use instead in Irish: 'I'm after finishing my prep.' Loads of other things too, like a distinction between different types of second-person, singular and plural (you/ye) and compound present tenses ('He does be working late').

Lots of these have died out or are in the process of doing so under urbanisation and foreign TV, but Biddy would have been born in the 1920s, and she's not speaking standard British English ungrammatically, but Hiberno-English perfectly correctly. But again, EBD is of her era, which had terribly prescriptive grammar norms, and the books reflect that. But I don't think there's any harm in pointing it out as one of the things that's very much of its historical period. I've always rather admired Samantha for raising even a small objection on the 'pure English' issue.

I wonder about whether Quebecois-French speakers would have been expected to speak the French of France at the CS? EBD seems to sidestep the issue by having the triplets learn an apparently 'pure' French in Canada, but in Toronto rather than Quebec...

As regards grammar in a British English speaker, does Joan Baker ever actually use bad grammar that we see? The only specific objection to her speech I can think of is her swearing. The rest of it is implied, via her not liking Elinor Pennell's 'la-di-da' voice and noticing that Rosamund is losing her Hampshire accent, but I can't recall any actual non-standard grammar that we're actually shown...?

Author:  Mia [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
things like 'different to' vs 'different than'


I wouldn't use either of these constructions, grr. I'm sorry but this is a real bugbear of mine; very similar to when people say less when they mean fewer. It makes me all twitchy! :)

Author:  Kathy_S [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think I'd take offense at Miss Ferrars' wording if I were Sam!

However, it's also true that both American and British schools were charged with instilling their respective brands of "standard English" as the hallmarks of educated persons. I'm afraid that "somewheres" would have been equally unpopular under both sets of rules. In my experience, it most often turns up when writers are trying to mimic hillbilly/backwoods dialect, e.g. "That there critter has to be somewheres," and my mother would probably have given her speech about "your father's ignorant relatives" corrupting our language if I'd used it. For some reason I thought "somewheres" was also British dialect, one of those turns of phrase preserved from immigrant ancestors, rather than an Americanism. Am I imagining this? The OED isn't much help this time, as it gives only one American example plus Robert Louis Stevenson's pirates.

"Different than," on the other hand, would be marked as the correct form under our rules....

Author:  Kate [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mia wrote:
Sunglass wrote:
things like 'different to' vs 'different than'


I wouldn't use either of these constructions, grr. I'm sorry but this is a real bugbear of mine; very similar to when people say less when they mean fewer. It makes me all twitchy! :)

Out of interest, what construction would you use to say the same thing? I'm being dense, I know! :)

Author:  Kathy_S [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Another possibility would be to get rid of the adjective and say, "X differs from Y."

There's also "Them two just ain't the same." :lol:
(Dad's cowboy novels are very instructive.)

Author:  Abi [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kate wrote:
Mia wrote:
Sunglass wrote:
things like 'different to' vs 'different than'


I wouldn't use either of these constructions, grr. I'm sorry but this is a real bugbear of mine; very similar to when people say less when they mean fewer. It makes me all twitchy! :)

Out of interest, what construction would you use to say the same thing? I'm being dense, I know! :)


'Different from' is the correct version (as you would say 'differ from', not 'differ to' or 'differ than') - I must admit this irritates me too (which shames me slightly!).

Author:  KatS [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I put an "s" on those kinds of words. I say somewheres, anywheres, nowheres, anyways, always, anyhows, somehows ... I don't know how much of it is a non-standard thing v. a regional thing. In high school, though, I think our grammar teacher only considered "nowheres" and "nohows" incorrect.

Not sure about the "purity" of Boston English, though...

Author:  Mia [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kate wrote:
Mia wrote:
Sunglass wrote:
things like 'different to' vs 'different than'


I wouldn't use either of these constructions, grr. I'm sorry but this is a real bugbear of mine; very similar to when people say less when they mean fewer. It makes me all twitchy! :)

Out of interest, what construction would you use to say the same thing? I'm being dense, I know! :)


Different from :D

Author:  Kate [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

:oops: :oops: I knew I was being dense!!

Author:  Kathy_S [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

"Different from" is also acceptable under our rules. Just be sure to use the correct case afterwards: "different from me," but "different than I (am)."

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I would never have known that. But Hilda would faint if she heard my English, or attempts at :oops:

Author:  Emsnan [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Moving aside slightly to the slang question - in one of the books it says something like "'Wizard' was allowed at the Chalet School but 'smashing' definitely was not." I never understood the reasoning behind that differentiation? :?

Author:  andydaly [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Some of Biddy's speech as EBD writes it is stage-Irish nonsense, but some of it is reasonably accurate Hiberno-English. Irish has no words for 'yes' and 'no', so you have Biddy saying 'I am' or 'I am not'/'It is'/'It isn't' in response to questions which would get a yes/no response in UK English. Irish doesn't have a pluperfect tense, and Hiberno-English uses 'after' to replicate the kinds of compond prepositions you use instead in Irish: 'I'm after finishing my prep.'


Ooh, Sunglass, (or any of you other highly knowledgeable CBBers out there) do me a favour - since you raise the "I'm after" construction, maybe you can clear up something I have always wanted to know about my own language :oops: .

Of course, I'm familiar with the "I'm after" construction in the sense of "We've decided we're not going to the theatre on Friday. But I'm after spending €30 on the ticket and I can't get a refund!"

However, and this only ever seems to crop up when foreign writers try to write Hiberno-English, I have read the "I'm after" construction in the following sense "I'm after going down to Cashel tomorrow and buying a bicycle", i.e., I want to go down to Cashel tomorrow.

I suspect that this is a misunderstanding of the "I'm after" to mean that this is something the speaker intends or wants, as in "What are you after?".

I've never heard it used that way in spoken Hiberno-English. Is this phrase actually ever used in this context?

Author:  Alison H [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I do sometimes wonder if there was an official list of banned words ...

I also wonder why no-one ever seemed to be told off for using French or German slang ...

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I do sometimes wonder if there was an official list of banned words ...


Isn't it just what the prees/ staff consider to sound like bad English? In 'Peggy' Hilary Wilson says "bamming" which, as Regency slang, surely wouldn't have been on any such list, but which she gets fined for anyway. And IIRC there is an instant of an old slang word being revived - by Katt Gordon? - and that being banned by the end of term.

Author:  Nightwing [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emsnan wrote:
Moving aside slightly to the slang question - in one of the books it says something like "'Wizard' was allowed at the Chalet School but 'smashing' definitely was not." I never understood the reasoning behind that differentiation?


It seems to be a little haphazard, but I think in one of the books (adult) Joey objects to 'smashing' because it's using a destructive word to describe something positive - I wonder if banning slang was based on how much a word had changed from its 'proper' meaning. So calling something 'decent' or 'jolly' would be fine, and 'marvellous' was objected to mostly on the grounds of being repetitious, not because it was being used incorrectly.

Alison H wrote:
I do sometimes wonder if there was an official list of banned words


In either Wrong or Carola the new girl introduces a new slang word at the beginning of the term (spiffing, maybe?) and at the end of the book I think it mentions that it's been added to the list of forbidden slang, but I don't know if that was an official list or if prefects and staff were just supposed to remember what was forbidden...

Alison H wrote:
I also wonder why no-one ever seemed to be told off for using French or German slang ...


Isn't there an instance of someone being told off for saying "ferme le bec"? But I imagine that for the most part EBD didn't know any French or German slang, at least, nothing current.

Author:  Kate [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
I do sometimes wonder if there was an official list of banned words ...

I also wonder why no-one ever seemed to be told off for using French or German slang ...

I remember either people being rebuked or EBD saying they deserved to be rebuked for saying "fermez les becs" or similar. I suppose EBD didn't know any German slang.

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

andydaly wrote:

However, and this only ever seems to crop up when foreign writers try to write Hiberno-English, I have read the "I'm after" construction in the following sense "I'm after going down to Cashel tomorrow and buying a bicycle", i.e., I want to go down to Cashel tomorrow.

I suspect that this is a misunderstanding of the "I'm after" to mean that this is something the speaker intends or wants, as in "What are you after?".

I've never heard it used that way in spoken Hiberno-English. Is this phrase actually ever used in this context?


I think your interpretation is the right one - it's a clash of usages of 'after'! Which foreign writer uses it like that?

Kate wrote:

I remember either people being rebuked or EBD saying they deserved to be rebuked for saying "fermez les becs" or similar.


I think that comes up a few times - actually, I get a bit taken aback by it, given that EBD clearly had some basic French, at least! 'Shut your mouth' is extremely rude by CS standards - and with 'bec' (literally 'beak') it's more 'shut your trap' or 'shut your gob'! I wonder if EBD grasped that she was having CS girls be quite 'coarse' in French! I tend to imagine OOAO and co snarling at one another like film noir gangsters: 'Shut your trap or I'll come over and shut it for you!'

I think she also has someone address another girl as 'vous chevre' at one point, which is clearly meant to be 'you goat', but which actually doesn't make any sense at all in French - but I assume there she's making fun of one of the girls literally translating from English.

Author:  andydaly [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Which foreign writer uses it like that?


'And here, you're going to put the whole thing into the hands of young Kelly; throwing up even the half of the business you have got!"

"Who says I'm afther doing any sich thing, Mr Daly?"

"Why, Martin Kelly says so. Didn't as many as four or five persons hear him say, down at Dunmore, that divil a one of the tenants'd iver pay a haporth of the November rents to anyone only jist to himself? There was father Geoghegan heard him, an Doctor Ned Blake."'

Trollope, The Kellys and the O'Kellys

I've done a quick search of Google using the search term "I'm afther" and it threw up a few examples, but some from authors I've never heard of - two American and two British, including Trollope above.

I've seen it in a few books, though I can't think of any offhand, and the necessary search terms such as "I'm after" or "He's after" are too general to be helpful. I have read others, I'll try and find some.

Author:  Loryat [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I remember when I was wee and first read Problem I couldn't understand all the bits where Rosamund said things that were bad grammar and the triplets don't know how to deal with it because they feel awkward about correcting her English, because I never realised which bits were incorrect.

I do find the bit where Joan realises Ros is losing her Hampshire accent very annoying. Why shouldn't Rosamund have a Hampshire accent? :evil:

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I can see a practical side to trying to rid people of their accents; it wouldn't look very good for a member of staff if they couldn't understand half the things a pupil said to them, and it would probably be quite demoralising for the girl - personally, I would hate to be the only one speaking with a marked accent and standing out so much. There is also research that suggests people can do better or worse in their careers depending on their accent, so from that point of view it might be enhancing the pupil's future.

Of course the other side of that is that your accent shouldn't make any difference - particularly at a school as supposedly open-minded and accepting as the CS.

But then Ros losing her accent could just be related to being surrounded by all of the people speaking RP English on a day to day basis.

Author:  JS [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

CBW wrote:

Quote:
I recently had a hellish journey on the M25 while my mother and daughter argued over whether or not it was good English to use 'access' as a verb. By the time we got to the Clacket Lane Services I was ready to ram it just to shut them up.


I'm going to the Scottish 'Gather' which annoys my husband - not the fact that I'm going, but he keeps pointing out that it should be 'GatherING'.

I think John Humphries was pulled up a few years back for a book where he was bemoaning impure English and modern abominations. One thing he complained bitterly about was the use of the word 'outwith'. He was told in no uncertain terms that this was a good Scottish phrase and had been for a good long time.

(by the way, I don't think 'access' should be a verb and the other one that annoys me is using 'impact' as a verb. Grr)

Author:  Tor [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I can see a practical side to trying to rid people of their accents; it wouldn't look very good for a member of staff if they couldn't understand half the things a pupil said to them


You see, I think that it is *very* easy to understand a whole range of accents if you just spend a little time listening to them. Not immediately, obviously, but very soon - if you make the effort - you get used to all sorts of quirks. Even the thickest of accents. A bit of interpolation and contextualization is required at first, but really I think it is only polite to do so. People who don't (unless they have hearing problems, which is a different matter) are, in my very, very humble opinion, lazy or a bit slow.

For example, I am on the train on the way home from Scotland. A man sitting behind me got off at Dundee. He was on his phone the whole time, and quite loud, and his accent (maybe even almost a dialect..?) was v. interesting. Every call he finished with 'Nae bo. Cho!' I've decided this must be 'No bother' (used in the same vein as the aussie 'No worries') and 'Bye' (either a contraction of Cheerio, or perhaps a Dundee accented 'Ciao'.... i doubt the latter, as this guy was not exactly a metrosexual type. but then that's probably highly judgmental of me). But maybe they were actually related to some gaelic that I don't know. Still, whatever the etymology, i reckon I've gauged the meaning correctly from the context. Obviously, my terrible eavesdropping is inexcusable. :oops:

But, then, I really enjoy linguistic exuberance and mad, made up words and playing with language. I love it when people turn verbs into nouns, for example, if they make me smile, or seem so right! Cadence is much more important to me, and I'll always pick an 'incorrect' phrase over a correct if the rhythm of the sentence feels better (to my mind, of course).

Of course, that feeling of rightness might partly stem from my own sloppy English. I have pretty much accepted that at the end of every piece of science writing I will ever do I will have to go back and do 'Find and Replace' in Word to change 'this data' to 'these data'. I think 'these data' sounds horrible. :lol:

Author:  JS [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Quote:
But maybe they were actually related to some gaelic that I don't know.


Speaking as a Dundonian, I'd say you're right on the 'no bother' (although I've never heard it shortened like that - more usually 'nae brora') and contraction of cheerio. Won't be anything to do with Gaelic, however, as it's not native to these parts!

And, although I'm a bit of a pedant (if one can be a 'bit' of a pedant) I agree that 'these data' just doesn't sound right.

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

In Princess, when the girls start speaking loudly like Matron, one of the mistresses (Miss Maynard, I think) reflects that until then she'd never heard such lovely voices and accents as the CS girls had :lol: . It's not quite as funny as when Miss Norman says that there can't be many schools with such good-looking mistresses as the CS has, but it makes me smile even so.

Some people use a different "voice" for different things - I used to share a desk at work with a guy who always answered the phone in a really affected voice/accent which it must have been obvious to anyone wasn't his usual way of speaking (presumably he thought it made him sound posh, but it just made him sound ridiculous!).

Author:  Tor [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Some people use a different "voice" for different things


Oh dear, that definitely includes me! Not (I hope) to Hyacinth Bucket levels, but I absolutely have a 'presentation' voice which would probably be classed as 'posher' than my normal accent. It helps me calm down and slow down my speech for one, and - just to totally contradict what i posted above - I think helps people understand me better. It's not totally a contradiction, i suppose, as a presentation is not a two way conversation, and the onus is on the speaker to be understood. I didn't totally realize I did it until I saw a film of me presenting my work. Before I heard myself, I just knew I was going into 'performance mode'.

thanks JS for the Dundonian translation. As for 'Nae bo', he had been making significant in-roads on a four pack of beers, so it may be he missed the 'rs' in 'Nae brora'!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'm trying to pull myself up and "improve" my speech. Mainly it's just slowing down - at least half my sentences have to be repeated even to people familiar with me - which also gives me time to think about my construction so I can start trying to drop some of my more annoying habites - "yeah, no" being the one my mum is particularly down on at the moment. I wouldn't say that I had an accent - though the fact I never leave Devon could mean that I've just never realised!

Tor, I take your point about it being polite, at least, to try and understand people, not just change them, but would it be fair for at least fifty people (the amount I would say could reasonably expect to be in contact with a pupil on a daily basis) to have to learn to understand a new pupil, or for her to change? I don't really have an opinion on it (I love my fence!) I'm just playing Devil's advocate :devil:

Author:  trig [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Quote:
Of course, that feeling of rightness might partly stem from my own sloppy English. I have pretty much accepted that at the end of every piece of science writing I will ever do I will have to go back and do 'Find and Replace' in Word to change 'this data' to 'these data'. I think 'these data' sounds horrible.


I'm the same. When I'm teaching probability I can't ever remember which is the plural, dice or die. "Rolling a die" just sounds a bit weird...

The whole correct grammar discussion fascinates me. While I accept that we need to have enough rules so that the exact meaning can be understood, it's surely also true that all languages and their usage changes over time. What's accepted usage now would probably not be in 200 years time.

I expect the slang issue was similar to the swearing issue in schools today. Different people have different standards for what is slang or swearing. Children today don't think that words such as 'damn' or 'crap' are swearing at all, whereas when I was at school in the 70's/80's you would have had your mouth washed out for using either!

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Going slightly OT now, but would schools like the CS have offered elocution lessons or would it have been assumed that pupils would speak in suitably posh voices anyway? Or would it have been covered in language lessons?

Author:  Emma A [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

But wasn't elocution also about things like verse-speaking as well as speaking "nicely"? Doesn't Katherine Brook in Anne of Windy Willows do that?

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emma A wrote:
But wasn't elocution also about things like verse-speaking as well as speaking "nicely"? Doesn't Katherine Brook in Anne of Windy Willows do that?


I'm a real fan of AoGG but I always thought the fact that Katherine Brook was an 'elocutionist?' made her sound even more dreary.

Author:  Jennie [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Actually Tor, to be pedantic, you ought to be referring to 'This datum.' it's a Latin noun, neuter, so datum. Data is the plural. Perhaps that will help your feelings as you use the replace button.

As someone who is hard of hearing and has a decoding problem as well, local accents are often difficult for me, especially if the speaker is speaking quickly. What I need is moderately slow speech, spoken as clearly as possible, and aimed at my right ear, as I am deafer on the left.


My pet hate is when someone says or writes 'The media is responsible for......'

No, they are. If referring to, say the radio, or the TV, it's singular, so it's a medium.

No wonder that the average school pupil, and live near lots of them, has such a limited vocabulary that they seem to have only one, pre-programmed response to any situation.

Author:  Sunglass [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Going slightly OT now, but would schools like the CS have offered elocution lessons or would it have been assumed that pupils would speak in suitably posh voices anyway?


I think it would certainly have been assumed - given the horror with which the girls' imitation of Matron elicits, which suggests vocal lapses were rare! And EBD's frequently-expressed dislike of voices which are not 'musical' or pleasant to listen to - one of her almost invariable codes for 'not the CS type' is a loud, metallic or grating voice - Miss Browne, Matron Thingie, Miss Bubb.

Mind you, come to think of it, some form of basic phonetics class might have been a practical idea in a multi-lingual school, as there are lots of sounds in all of the CS official languages that are difficult for non-native speakers - witness Simone and Robin's troubles pronouncing 'j' and 'th' in English.

Tor wrote:
You see, I think that it is *very* easy to understand a whole range of accents if you just spend a little time listening to them. [..] A bit of interpolation and contextualization is required at first, but really I think it is only polite to do so.


I quite agree. I'd say further that I think it's a power issue - for someone who is privileged enough to believe the way s/he speaks is the norm or the 'right way', there is no onus on him or her to make an effort to understand the way other people speak in their 'wrong' or 'quaint' or 'ugly' dialects. Myself, I feel very strongly about retaining my own working-class Irish accent as an academic, as I think it's important for non-middle-class students to feel people who don't speak RP are equally entitled to be the one up on the platform talking about the 19thc novel. (Which is why it pleases me that Biddy somehow manages to preserve an element of her accent - though God knows how, given there's no evidence she ever returned to Ireland - although it's somehow become a fascinating 'lilt' by her teaching days, rather than something she's stigmatised for...)

Privilege can certainly make people pretty dense, though - I was once so irritated by a rude elderly woman at a high table dinner (who kept remarking on my 'brogue' and quizzing me on how 'someone from your background' had ended up at Oxford, despite my initially polite attempts to turn the subject) that I eventually ended up turning the tables and pretending I couldn't understand a word she boomed and shaking my head and saying I was sorry, I found her strong accent rather impeded my comprehension, and hadn't she ever considered stopping yod dropping or her epenthetic rs to make herself easier to understand for people at large? :twisted: :)

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

trig wrote:
Children today don't think that words such as 'damn' or 'crap' are swearing at all, whereas when I was at school in the 70's/80's you would have had your mouth washed out for using either!


It works the other way around too... imagine the shocked faces when my mum responded to my brother's complaints with "Oh, minge minge" :shock: :shock: :shock:

Apparently, in her day, it was a synonym for "whinge" :lol:

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I still get told off for using either of those words - in fact the last time I remember swearing in the vicinity of a parent was when I fell backwards on some ice and banged my tail pretty badly. I cannot stand people who feel the need to swear constantly - there is no reason at all to, there is a perfectly good language out there (and I'm starting to realise just how quickly we're losing it :banghead:)

Author:  Nightwing [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

ChubbyMonkey wrote:
...and I'm starting to realise just how quickly we're losing it :banghead:


But if we stop swearing, just think of all the lovely swearwords we'd lose! :lol:

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Nightwing wrote:
But if we stop swearing, just think of all the lovely swearwords we'd lose! :lol:


Ghastly, awful, spiffing, absolutely It...

Author:  Lesley [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Privilege can certainly make people pretty dense, though - I was once so irritated by a rude elderly woman at a high table dinner (who kept remarking on my 'brogue' and quizzing me on how 'someone from your background' had ended up at Oxford, despite my initially polite attempts to turn the subject) that I eventually ended up turning the tables and pretending I couldn't understand a word she boomed and shaking my head and saying I was sorry, I found her strong accent rather impeded my comprehension, and hadn't she ever considered stopping yod dropping or her epenthetic rs to make herself easier to understand for people at large? :twisted: :)



Fantastic! :lol: Did she 'get' it?

Author:  Sunglass [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lesley wrote:

Fantastic! :lol: Did she 'get' it?


Well, she looked as if she'd swallowed her napkin... :dontknow:

Author:  Emsnan [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Diving in quickly to Problem before going to work this morning, I read that Joan Baker was prone to saying "Lawks!" - a word I never actually heard spoken by anyone in 'real life' but was always associated with servant-speak in films and on TV, e.g. "Lawks, Mr 'Udson". She also used the expression "didn't half" as in "we didn't half have fun". I used to use this, picked up from my father, but quickly came to realise it wasn't said in "the best circles" (as Karen Marlow would say) and I don't think I say it at all now. That's the kind of speech I meant earlier on when I wrote "a rough way of speaking." It might not be considered so now, but it was in my formative years.

Author:  Miss Di [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
You see, I think that it is *very* easy to understand a whole range of accents if you just spend a little time listening to them. Not immediately, obviously, but very soon - if you make the effort - you get used to all sorts of quirks. Even the thickest of accents. A bit of interpolation and contextualization is required at first, but really I think it is only polite to do so. People who don't (unless they have hearing problems, which is a different matter) are, in my very, very humble opinion, lazy or a bit slow.



I don't think I am lazy or slow. But there are some British accents which I find almost incomprehensible (sp?). Like the ones on that show on SBS about trawlermen in the north Atlantic. Once those blokes got excited I needed subtitles! And as I said previously, I have a cousin-in-law who I have to really work to understand and I've known him over 20 years. I think if you were working with someone all the time, yes, you would get used to the accent , but if you only hear/speak to someone once in a blue moon who has a very different accent it can be almost like they are speaking a different language. Also, there is very little regional variation in Australian accents, so maybe there is the amount/frequency that you are accustomed to listening to different accents.

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

A colleague and I once had to drive down to a rather remote part of southern England (I won't say where in case I offend anyone!) to a client's office there, and we got a bit lost :oops: . We stopped to ask directions, and we honestly couldn't understand more than half of what the person we asked was telling us! It's very rare that I can't understand what someone's saying because of their accent, but it does happen occasionally.

Author:  Tor [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Actually Tor, to be pedantic, you ought to be referring to 'This datum.' it's a Latin noun, neuter, so datum. Data is the plural. Perhaps that will help your feelings as you use the replace button.


Thanks Jenny - though I am aware of this :lol: . My 'data' *is* 'data' as it is plural (I have *lots* of data). I just tend to think of it as a singular body when I talk about it, as it is the total volume of the data that is supporting my argument. Hence this. I still think it sounds better!

Quote:
I don't think I am lazy or slow. But there are some British accents which I find almost incomprehensible (sp?)... but if you only hear/speak to someone once in a blue moon who has a very different accent it can be almost like they are speaking a different language.


I'm sure you're not! It's the latter point that I really mean - decoding an accent takes time, but it pretty much always possible if you make the effort. As you have. I doubt you see your cousin-in-law every day, for example, and at the end of your time chatting with him, you are better able to understand him than at the start. Sunglass hit the nail on the head, i think, in saying it is a power thing by people who don't even try to understand, and make a real hullabaloo about not being able to understand.

Quote:
Also, there is very little regional variation in Australian accents, so maybe there is the amount/frequency that you are accustomed to listening to different accents


Interesting point! And, again, it makes you think about the CS in that it must have been a place with a multitude of accents as well as languages. I think it is clear that accent is focussed upon in the CS as a class marker, rather than a comprehension issue. But it was very much of it's time. Similar attitudes prevail today, but there is a reaction against them (Sunglass, you are a much stronger woman than I. My accent ranges all over the place depending on who I speak to... basically, I think my inner-self is saying "Like, like me! i am part of your group", even if my intellect doesn't care whether they accept me or not! :roll: :oops: )

Author:  meerium [ Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
My accent ranges all over the place depending on who I speak to... basically, I think my inner-self is saying "Like, like me! i am part of your group", even if my intellect doesn't care whether they accept me or not!


I get 'wandering accent syndrome' too! Particularly when I go over to England for any length of time. I lived in Liverpool for 9 years (under and post graduate degrees!) and I think I probably started by softening my accent a little bit to get round people not catching what I said, so it comes naturally almost immediately I come over visiting to soften down again. One of my closest friends from university said she always used to know when I was speaking to my mum on the phone, because my accent would get steadily broader over the course of the phone call!

Of course, the more I got used to staying softer, the more I also picked up accent tics from other areas - my friends were mostly from the Midlands or the North East, and I also taught a lot of local kids clarinet and piano. When I first came back to Belfast my accent was a very peculiar combination of things!

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I have a friend from Cork who is quite accentless. When I first met her I reckoned she was from South Dublin with country parents. I was highly amused when I heard her speaking to a cousin of hers from County Cork, her accent reverted right away to her home county. It was actually quite amazing.
Tor wrote:
Sunglass hit the nail on the head, i think, in saying it is a power thing by people who don't even try to understand, and make a real hullabaloo about not being able to understand.

My daughter has a friend whose father is from the Cavan/Monaghan border and I defy anyone to understand half of what he is saying on first meeting him. I am strained to the limit to decipher the gist of the conversation and I have to rely very heavily on the context. My old GP was from the same area and he was as bad. A kinder and more caring doctor you'd never meet but certainly at first you'd need an interpreter.

Author:  jmc [ Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

meerium wrote:
Quote:
My accent ranges all over the place depending on who I speak to... basically, I think my inner-self is saying "Like, like me! i am part of your group", even if my intellect doesn't care whether they accept me or not!


I get 'wandering accent syndrome' too!


I also get this. My mum is from New Zealand so I go over there quite frequently to visit relatives. When I'm there I gradually start using a kiwi accent. I have also done the same in the UK and in the States. Mainly to make it easier to be understood. Many people have told me that they find an Aussie accent difficult to understand, that we talk too fast and that we use too much slang. Once in America I said that I had seen some nice jumpers and they thought I was talking about someone commiting suicide by jumping off a building. I came back from 12 months in Japan speaking very strangely, I am told, as my accent had changed to an odd hybrid of Bitish and American.

My dad is Dutch though he speaks with a pure aussie accent. He moved to Australia when he was 16 and got tired of people looking down on him and harrassing him because of his Dutch accent. He changed his name for the same reason.

I find it interesting watching my nieces and nephews playing with their toys because at many times depending on what toy they are playing with they often have American accents.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Both my parents would revert as soon as they went into "home country" - Somerset for one and Scotland for the other. For Scotland, especially, it was difficult to understand. Though if you've never had a granfer groucher pointed out before, it disconcerts you slightly...

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Quote:
I don't think I am lazy or slow. But there are some British accents which I find almost incomprehensible (sp?)... but if you only hear/speak to someone once in a blue moon who has a very different accent it can be almost like they are speaking a different language.


I think it's a two way street. Of course one should make every effort to understand another person's way of speaking in order to avoid offending them, but equally they should make an effort to be understood by, perhaps, slowing down their speech or avoiding esoteric slang.
I have a fairly neutral Dublin accent and years ago when I had a summer job in the West of Ireland some of the permanent staff use to slag off my accent and then speed up their speech so that I had huge difficulty understanding them. They thought it was hilarious.

Author:  Tor [ Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I think it's a two way street. Of course one should make every effort to understand another person's way of speaking in order to avoid offending them


Of course it's a two way street, but I've generally found if you have two such minded people in conversation, mutual understanding is reached very quickly. It is usually pretty clear if you have been misunderstood by the replies you get, or the way conversation evolves. You then can have a laugh about the misunderstanding, and correct it, and learn a bit about each others verbal idiosyncrasies. The human brain is amazing - it can pick up new languages superficially in a very short period of time. Random bits of dialect and accent variation are teeny tasks in comparison.

The worst case scenario is talking to someone who just says 'I can't understand your accent' and then just stands and waits for you to repeat yourself , then progresses to say 'oh you mean xxxxxxx', as though implying their way is the correct pronunciation. They also tend to go on correcting your pronunciation later, rather than clocking your way if saying something and remembering it. To say 'this accent is impossible to understand' is as defeatist as 'this language is impossible to learn'. (difficult, maybe, impossible, no).

I am used to being told to slow down, and I don't mind that at all. But I do hate talking slowly, I can't keep up with my thoughts as it is. I love meeting another fast speaker as you cover so much more ground in conversations (though it is very exhausting).

Quote:
some of the permanent staff use to slag off my accent and then speed up their speech so that I had huge difficulty understanding them


That's just rude, and exactly the kind on in-group/out-group nastiness that makes accent such a class marker in the UK (and thus I am guessing also a bit in Eire). They sound horrid.

To bring this back to the CS, I really think that the language proficiency and multi-national aspect of the school would have made the CS staff and pupils very skilled at coping with multiple accents.

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
The human brain is amazing - it can pick up new languages superficially in a very short period of time. Random bits of dialect and accent variation are teeny tasks in comparison.


You are obviously exceptionally clever and probably gifted with language. I'm not either. It's taken me a long time to fully understand my inner city students' speak. The grammar, syntax and pronunciation is quite different and the slang extremely creative. I love the sounds of the words and the quick and clever use of language. The speed of delivery too is phenonemal. My second day in the school a student burst into the room to look for permission to go home, as I was her tutor. Naturally I asked the reason for the emergency and she replied "I'm only after leavin me blexxxxx brother locked in the sittin room in me gaff." "And I suppose it was you locked him in," I said crossly. "Are youse blexxxxng tick or what he's only locked, polluted, blotto, plastered."

Author:  Kathy_S [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

*is still lost*

She's only -- is that sarcastic? -- going to leave her expletive-deleted brother drunk in her living room in her what? The only gaff I know of is a sharp thingummy used to stab fish or hook them together -- seems too violent for the context. And I'm guessing tick is thick/not too bright? :?

Author:  Lesley [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Gaff is a term for your home - I get that one! :lol:


I'm sure that familiarity with an accent can cause you to be able to work out what it being said - but it takes time and even then there is still the possibility of misunderstanding.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I had a Scottish customer the other day who was trying to ask for a fruit scone, but I couldn't understand her at all. I had to ask three times and hope she assumed that it was the noise the coffee machine was making. It sounded awfully like she was asking for a song - I was tempted to explain that my singing voice wasn't that good.

Author:  Lottie [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Was that from the problem of whether 'scone' rhymes with 'gone' or 'bone'? Personally, I'd always go with the former, but I have heard people using the other one.

Of course, if it refers to a well known stone, it sounds completely different, again! :lol:

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Usually I go with the latter (to go with my plaastic) but I do find myself mimicking the customers sometimes and saying it how they do - again, changing accents :lol:

Author:  Tor [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
You are obviously exceptionally clever and probably gifted with language


Oh help! I don't think so ... :oops: :oops: I do find aural comprehension fairly easy, it seems, as I find myself able to understand foreign languages quite quickly (though I am rubbish at speaking them). But I always assumed I was just attuned to body language etc, that helped me decipher context and work from that. Once a few word get repeated a few times in familiar contexts, I tend to work them out.

Mostly, however, I get p**ssed off that I seem to be able to make the effort to understand other peoples' accents, and yet don't seem to have the courtesy returned that often. Hence it's a bug-bear of mine, as more often than not calling attention to someones accent is a great way of stressing difference between you and them.

But this thread has really opened my eyes to the fact that maybe others don't find it as easy as me (though I don't find it easy, exactly, I just try to accommodate others, and find the effort worthwhile), and perhaps I am being unfair to people. (Don't think so for a number of them, though, you can generally spot the sort who are genuinely confused to those who are indulging in some power play).

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lottie wrote:
Was that from the problem of whether 'scone' rhymes with 'gone' or 'bone'? Personally, I'd always go with the former, but I have heard people using the other one.

Of course, if it refers to a well known stone, it sounds completely different, again! :lol:


I once looked this up in the Oxford English Dictionary in an attempt to settle an argument, and apparently both pronunciations are correct!

(I pronounce scone to rhyme with gone, as well!)

Author:  JS [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

In Scotland, scone definitely rhymes with gone (unless it's the village/stone, in which case it's 'scoon')

It's 'fete' which causes the most angst in our house (I have an English husband). He insists on pronouncing it 'fate' whereas I call it 'fet'.

Author:  Sunglass [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:

Mostly, however, I get p**ssed off that I seem to be able to make the effort to understand other peoples' accents, and yet don't seem to have the courtesy returned that often. Hence it's a bug-bear of mine, as more often than not calling attention to someones accent is a great way of stressing difference between you and them.


This is pretty much my experience. The reason I can't be unaware of the nuance and powerplay (conscious or unconscious) of accents, dialects and comprehension, is that I am working-class in a stongly middle-class profession. My sympathy for Joan Baker (as the CBB in general will know!) is based on having spent what sometimes feels like my entire early adult life being considered either terribly exotic or vaguely laughable for being the daughter of a binman and a cleaner, with a politics, early life and way of speaking that didn't match UK middle-class norms (but also don't 'make sense' in relation to my doctorate, or presence in the common rooms of Oxford, apparently...)

I'd agree with Tor - I'm not a brilliant linguist by any means (my current attempt to learn Arabic is driving me to distraction!), so it seems odd to me that, with effort and politeness, I can understand virtually any accent, and wouldn't dream of remarking on its quaintness etc, or correcting its pronunciation, but the same courtesy is not often returned. The only rationale I can find for this is that it's considered entirely ordinary to find other accents incomprehensible when you speak a relatively prestigious or normative dialect, but the reverse isn't true because of the power imbalance. I am supposed to be able to understand, and to want to emulate, more prestigious accents.

I'm not expecting a prize for my own efforts, either, on the rare occasions I'm the one with the power in a linguistic situation! - I think in general it's its own reward. I was in South Africa recently for the first time, and one of the nicest and most informative conversations I had was with a taxi driver whose very basic English was also inflected through Afrikaans and his mothertongue Xhosa. We found one another hard to understand at the beginning, but over the course of a taxi ride we worked out what we had to do to be more easily understood by one another, and I learned more things about post-apartheid SA than any amount of museums and reading told me. Plus I can now do two different Xhosa 'clicks'!

Anyway, for me the privilege of being considered normative or prestigious in your speech is behind CS rebukes of Biddy or Samantha (or Jack Lambert - does someone note her saying something regional?) or the girls noting the MacDonald twins' 'funny' accents. I probably wouldn't notice it so much if the CS wasn't such an international school, presumably with dozens of accents, including the times we are told about girls speaking French 'with a good British accent' (which doesn't seem to be regarded as a problem, even if it's not 'pretty' like Len's French!)

Author:  Alison H [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Jack Lambert uses the Cheshire term "collywest".

I've always wondered which part of Cheshire Jack came from, but that's beside the point!

& I love it when Samantha tells Miss Ferrars that she can't believe she's being told off using what in American English is perfectly correct grammar.

I'm afraid that I seem to have some sort of reverse psychology thing going on: if I'm speaking to someone who speaks in a way that the CS would presumably consider correct, i.e. received pronunciation, I start talking in a much broader Manchester accent than I do normally - and I really don't do it deliberately but it always happens!

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
(my current attempt to learn Arabic is driving me to distraction!),

I cannot even imagine attempting such a feat!
From my own, admittedly limited experience, what really separates the sheep from the goats currently is intelligence. It is at least as crucial a factor as social class. Our school is fed primarily by two primary schools. One is half way between our catchment area and is a far more academic community school, and the other is almost next door to us. It's no secret that the teachers in the first primary school encourgage their brighter students to go to the more academic school and pass on to us their most disadvantaged students. That being said, we do have our fair share of academically bright students and most of them avail of our access programme. Many of them, about 17% of the entire student body go straight on to third level and do exceptionally well, some picking up middle class norms on the way, others not.
As regards accent being used as a power thing, I'd have to admit that that often is a sad fact of life, and I've been on the receiving end of it. However, it isn't always the case. I'm a inveterate people pleaser by nature and I get genuinely nervous when I'm speaking to someone and I can't make out what they're saying. If I'm struggling to follow their conversation it isn't because I believe my way of speaking is superior, it's because I feel anxious in case I offend them or don't appear to be listening attentitively.

Author:  trig [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Usually I go with the latter (to go with my plaastic) but I do find myself mimicking the customers sometimes and saying it how they do - again, changing accents



When I worked in a cafe I did this too! But only because when I asked customers if they prefered a fruit or cheese scone (gone) they often said in a snooty way that it was a scone (cone) they wanted so I gave up and always said scone (cone).

I experienced something similar when I first started teaching. I originally come from Merseyside and I did my first teaching practice in Romsey, Hampshire. The students all looked completely blank when I spoke of a graph (graaph) until one of them said knowingly "Oh, I expect Miss means a grarph, snigger snigger" I have been tougher on this one and now my students in deepest Suffolk all talk about graaphs (and understand them!!)

Author:  Kate [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:
*is still lost*

She's only -- is that sarcastic? -- going to leave her expletive-deleted brother drunk in her living room in her what? The only gaff I know of is a sharp thingummy used to stab fish or hook them together -- seems too violent for the context. And I'm guessing tick is thick/not too bright? :?


Gaff is house. 'I'm only' is a turn of phrase that can mean several things - without context here I imagine that it means that the event was in the recent past. "I'm only after leaving" = "I just left".

Re scones: Is scone (to rhyme with cone) a more "posh" pronunciation in the UK? In Ireland it's the most common pronunciation and I think scone (to rhyme with gone) is considered more "posh".

Author:  Tor [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I don't know, I say scone to rhyme with cone, but my mum grew up working-class Irish, and I get a lot of pronunciation from her. My accent is basically Estuary English, but verges on the posher end when I'm in London as my SLOC has a rather rarified accent and - weak minded as I am - I tend to speak more like him. I think he'd say scone to rhyme with gone (but then, despite his rarified accent, his mum is an Aussie and his speech is peppered with aussie words and pronunciations, particualrly for nouns).

Not much help there, was I?! Maybe if you are really posh you don't eat scones at all.... but simply stick to the champagne and cucumber sandwiches when taking tea at the Ritz?!!!!

Author:  Mel [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

One breaks the scones in half and gives them to the corgis - apparently!

Author:  andi [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've always been grateful that my mixed up Zim/South African accent makes me difficult to 'peg' in the UK :D

I was doing a volunteer gardening day yesterday at one of the National Trust gardens, and one of the other volunteers, a Finnish girl, asked me whether there were any beans in the garden. I suggested she try the vegetable gardens - and then realised she was asking whether there were any 'bins' - as in rubbish bins! Luckily she saw the funny side. :D

Author:  Mia [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kate wrote:
Re scones: Is scone (to rhyme with cone) a more "posh" pronunciation in the UK? In Ireland it's the most common pronunciation and I think scone (to rhyme with gone) is considered more "posh".


They're both fine. Scone-cone is non-U and scone-gone is U (bringing us neatly round in a circle!) but I don't think it really matters any more.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I hadn't realized there was a pronunciation other than scone-rhymes-with-cone, including for the Stone of: very interesting! But then here scones are often muffins* relabeled for the upscale market: probably no relation to scones there.

*No relation to the "English muffins" sold in the bread aisle of US supermarkets. I mean the berry muffins, chocolate muffins etc. that you bake in muffin tins. The shape of a cupcake but more dense, more likely a breakfast item than a dessert.

ETA: I'm very glad I didn't have to interpret the girl with the brother! If I've got the interpretation correct now, she left him in her house/gaff and came to school just to ask to leave again? Not that my own students don't come up with plenty of excuses....

Author:  delrima [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Scones to us are your biscuits (for breakfast with white sauce - called gravy - poured over them.) Personally, over there, I always hold the gravy, rescue the biscuit and eat it with butter and jam. Can't seem to "do in Rome" in all circumstances.

Author:  MJKB [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:
ETA: I'm very glad I didn't have to interpret the girl with the brother! If I've got the interpretation correct now, she left him in her house/gaff and came to school just to ask to leave again? Not that my own students don't come up with plenty of excuses....


She hadn't come home the previous night with her brother but had stayed with her friend two doors down. Her friend's brother had been 'knacker' drinking with the brother and had 'helped' him home. He then told his sister the state her friend's brother was in and she then told her friend when they were at assembly that morning.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Aha! All is explained. Thank you.

EBD never had to handle that one, did she. I guess the closest we come would be Margot's poor excuse of a husband and the notorious San-registrar, Mr. Grier. Well, maybe persons attending ice carnivals.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:
EBD never had to handle that one, did she. I guess the closest we come would be Margot's poor excuse of a husband and the notorious San-registrar, Mr. Grier. Well, maybe persons attending ice carnivals.


I'm now picturing Madge stood in the middle of the ice lecturing them for the good of their souls...

How would pupils with British parents have fared at the CS? Surely they would speak with at least a trace of the accent from whatever country they were in, but EBD never seems to mention that it needs correcting. For example, Daisy must have had an Australian accent, at least to some extent, but IIRC she is never told to improve her English.

Author:  hac61 [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I was brought up with a rural Essex accent which I had to loose at Drama School, where I learnt the "accepted" (according to LAMDA) pronunciation.

In my early twenties I spent 18 months in North Carolina and came home with a mild southern accent. I then lived in Grays for two years and combined that lot with a Thameside accent.

When I went to Newcastle Poly I found that they couldn't understand me and I couldn't understand them! The first term was one of blank comprehension on both sides. Over the three years I was up there I learnt to understand my fellow students when they were speaking regular English, but if they slipped into Geordie I'd had it.

Before coming to Wales I spent 10 years in Suffolk, which interestingly enough brought out my original Essex accent. Lots of the English speakers around here have Birmingham/Midlands accents. You can imagine what my attempts at Welsh sound like! :lol:

hac

Author:  Emma A [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I always though the skon/skoan difference was more regional than class-based: northerners say 'skon' and southerners (or midlands types) say 'skoan'. Or at least that's been my experience for England, anyway.

Author:  Tor [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Another pronunciation thing that can cause very tedious discussions between people who both think thay are right is Nougat: does one say Nugar or Nuggut?

Lots of people seem to think saying 'Nugar' is pretentious, I've found (you'll quite often hear someone say "oooh! Nooooogaaaahh! Aren't we fancy!'). It seems to be more related to the fact that by saying it that way, you seem to be integrating foreign words into ordinary language, and thus showing off.

Which brings me to a sort-off-if-if-you-squint-at-it CS realted point. Do we think the CS girls used the 'correct', foreign pronunciation for words of foreign origin that now commonly spoken in English. Did they say Parriss or Paree, if they were to use it on English day, for example....?

Author:  Sunglass [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Yes, I always wonder about the effects of regular place-specific multilingualism, like the situation at the CS, and its effects on how each language is spoken, like the 'Paris/Paree' issue (for native English speakers, obviously - Simone would presumably pronounce Paris the same way in either language). I speak French semi-regularly with French friends, and used to live in France, but I would never pronounce the name of the city the French way unless I were actually speaking French - which is fairly inconsistent, I suppose, because I pronunce all other French place names the same way (the French way) whichever language I am speaking...!

Those kinds of things can be pounced on, certainly - for some people they are shibboleths (are you well-educated? well-travelled? sophisticated enough to realise Russians don't call their city Moscow?). I remember some interviewer quite viciously taking the piss out of Emma Thompson for pretentiousness, when she was talking about some human rights issue in Chile and pronouncing it throughout in the Spanish way as 'CHEE-lay'...

I think it also comes down to who you are used to speaking to about a place, though - if your primary contact with a place its via its own inhabitants speaking about it in their native language, then you're going to say 'Wien' more naturally than 'Vienna' and 'Chee-lay' rather than 'Chilly' - the reverse might seem odd, even disrespectful...?

Vienna is definitely 'Wien' for British characters speaking English to one another in the Tyrol books, but I think things like that would be very different by the time the school re-establishes on the Gornetz Platz with a very British intake.

The one that always fascinates me is the indication in one of the Swiss books that the girls (we see Len doing it at least) refer to Miss Annersley as 'Madame' (apparently withut the surname) when speaking about her in French on French days, given that I really thought that was Madge's special title, and that Hilda would have been 'Madame Annersley'. I wonder too if that held for all mistresses - if Kathy Ferrars was Fraulein or Mademoiselle Ferrars depending on the day...?

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I always imagined that the titles remained the same - hence, Mlle Berne on every day of the week!

Interesting point about the place names. I suppose that techincally it should be pronounced according to regular intonation, but that doesn't often seem to be the case. I wonder if the non-native English speakers would pronounce English place names correctly, or if you would get things like 'Vustershire' (odd example, sorry :oops:)

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD used the German rather than the Italian names for places in South Tyrol at the end of School At - Bozen and Meran rather than Bolzano and Merano - which would have been quite a big deal at a time when Austria still hoped to get South Tyrol back. I assume those must've been the names she heard used when she was at the Achensee, though, and that was why she used them. Having said

I've never been sure why she referred to "Petrograd" when it'd been Leningrad for a good few years, and "Constantinople" when it'd been Istanbul for years, though :roll: . Having said which, the BBC still insists on referring to Myanmar as Burma :roll: .

IIRC, Nina Rutherford is confused when her uncle pronounces Berne (or even Bern) with "a good British accent", but other than the Wien/Vienna thing I don't think the subject of place names really comes up. Most of the places they go to/which come into the story don't have separate "English" names. I was thinking of Koln/Cologne, but Robin's first language was French so she'd've referred to the place where she was born as Cologne anyway.

I can well imagine Grizel, on the initial trip out in School At, talking about "Pariz" and Joey saying "No, no, it's Paree" :lol: .

Author:  Nightwing [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Yes, I always wonder about the effects of regular place-specific multilingualism, like the situation at the CS, and its effects on how each language is spoken, like the 'Paris/Paree' issue (for native English speakers, obviously - Simone would presumably pronounce Paris the same way in either language). I speak French semi-regularly with French friends, and used to live in France, but I would never pronounce the name of the city the French way unless I were actually speaking French - which is fairly inconsistent, I suppose, because I pronunce all other French place names the same way (the French way) whichever language I am speaking...!


Paris is a difficult one, because its English and French names are spelled the same but pronounced differently. I mean, I imagine girls call Cologne 'Cologne' on English days and 'Köln' on German days, while London probably had to be 'Londres' on French days... But my French friends pronounce Paris in the English way when they are speaking English, so I think it's safe to assume that that is its English name (or has become its English name) rather than just horrifically mangled pronunciation.

On a slightly different note, which French and German accents do you think the girls would have had to speak with? I think there are references to girls' French being 'fluent, if not Parisian in accent' - was this also classism, of a kind? I mean, was a Parisian accent seen as being the Best One? And presumably Austrian and Swiss girls were meant to speak High German, not regional dialects.

Author:  Cel [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Having said which, the BBC still insists on referring to Myanmar as Burma :roll: .



This is a deliberate political stance, though, isn't it, rather than just cultural ignorance? To do with not recognising the legitimacy of the military government which changed the name. The US takes the same position, I think...

Author:  Kate [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

You're right, Cel.

Quote:
Britain's policy is to refer to Burma rather than 'Myanmar'. The current regime changed the name to Myanmar in 1989. Burma's democracy movement prefers the form ‘Burma’ because they do not accept the legitimacy of the unelected military regime and thus their right to change the official name of the country. Internationally, both names are recognised.
- from here.

Author:  andydaly [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'd think Nightwing is right - on the different language days, the girls would pronounce the names of cities etc., as they are called in the language they were speaking. I wouldn't find it disrespectful if someone speaking French to me pronounced Ireland as Irlande, for example - I'd find it kind of strange if they didn't!

Author:  Tor [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

yes, that would have been my take too, thus Simone would have been corrected for saying 'Paree' on English days....

but...

there is the whole palava of meal names: new girls are always surprised when they are told Lunch is called Mittagessen, and it (and the other meals) seems to be called that on French and English days too. And key rooms keep their German monickers too, it seems.

Interesting point about the accent the girls would be taught to speak other languages in. Way back in the early sections of this thread, I think we discussed the difference in EBDs attitude to 'foreign' peasants and the English poor. But I had never thought much about the aspect of accents in that context. I remember some refs to pure Parisian french, as well (but not enough of the context to guage if there was any value judgement added to it.. wasn't it actualy referring to the Triplets learning French in Canada, which makes it a strange thing to be speaking Parisian French! If so, I'd say that was a class judgement - Old country vs New country, in this sense ). But as for German, I don't know.... EBD makes a virtue of Joey, Len etc being able to converse rapidly in various patois, but that sort-of implies they were learning some form of 'RP' German at school.

Does anyone know much about the accent politics of other countries? I know that a lot of my french chums do roll their eyes about Parisians, and the Parisian accent. But I haven't got to the bottom of it! And I have a Swedish friend whole says she will not move to Norway ever (even though there is lots of cash sloshing around there for marine biologists and her and her partner are both looking for work in that line) because she hates the accent, and thinks it will affect her childrens' Swedish accent and make them sound stupid! :roll: :roll:

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

French (within France itself) is more standardised than UK English, to the extent that French people are not that good at distinguishing regional accents even from really far apart places within France (the equivalent of Edinburgh and Penzance) , and I think class markers are also less obvious than in UK English, making it all more uniform. From an Austrian student of mine, though, I gather that Austrian German differs from the standard German of Germany (which is itself strongly regional, so there are lots of Standard Germans) about as much as US English from UK English, which may have meant that Marie von Eschenau spoke a quite different German to her cousin Thekla...

But EBD is clearly mapping on ideas about UK English onto her desire to show the CS girls speaking a 'prestigious' version of French, although she sometimes ties herself up in knots trying to do so - like the triplets not learning Quebecois French, despite being in Canada (because she clearly thinks that would be 'wronger' than the French of France) and Polly Heriot arriving at the CS with what EBD clearly wants us to understand to be the French equivalent of RP, from a relatively unlikely source, an unusually highly-educated maid:

Quote:
‘She speaks prettily, and very fluently, and her knowledge of the grammar is good. She tells me that her aunts had a maid who was Parisienne, and they insisted that the child should converse with her every day. She must have been an educated woman, for Polly uses certain expressions that are quaint and old-fashioned, but always the purest of French.’


Also, I don't know much about the Channel Islands in general, but I know that Guernsey French, which was the official language of the island till after WWII, tended by be rather looked down as as a hick 'patois' - so the fluent 'pretty' French the Guernsey CS girls apparently speak needs a bit of explaining.

(Or do they all speak good French? I think we're told they do at some point, but then seem to remember OOAO as the language prodigy in Three Go, rather than Vi Lucy...?) In the La Rochelle books, do we ever see the characters speaking French/Guernesais to one another or the servants, or anything like that? By the 30s it would have been seen, I think, as a peasanty 'corrupt' dialect likely to 'hold you back', which wouldn't sit well with EBD's liking her characters to be well-spoken in all their languages... We're told in Barbara that Barbara has learned her 'pretty' French, from her mother, 'whose early years had been spent in France' - which I suppose gets round the issue...

I have to say, on French days, it would have blown my mind slightly to have to get my head and tongue around ''Il faut aller au Saal pour Kaffee und Kuchen a seize heures et puis on a Abendessen a dix-neuf...'

ETA that I just noticed in Barbara that we're told that Julie Lucy's French is fluent because

Quote:
like Barbara; she had heard a good deal at home, thanks to their two mothers and their Aunt Elizabeth having spent so much of their girlhood in France


Again, not 'non-standard' Guernsey French, but the French of France...

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

All three of the Temple girls (Janie Lucy, Anne Chester and Elizabeth Ozanne) spent a lot of their time in France and went to school in Paris, so I always thought that would explain their pretty French accents.

I'm absolutely flabagasted at how important accents are in the UK and the fact that there is a difference to the point people look down on others for it. I can understand why people would insist on speaking so others can understand but that would be about all I would think is important, but to refuse to be polite simply because their accent is different to me is the height of rudeness. Is it really that bad, or is it the exception rather than the rule? I'm getting a horrible picture in my head that most people in the UK are horrible snobs about how people speak and yet I never found that when I lived there except from anyone trying to climb the class system.

I do find it interesting that Maeve Bichy writes in her book Circle of Friends about Nan being taught in her elocution class not to put on a posher accent, but to speak clearly and well as anything else would mark her out as the worse kind of social climber.

Author:  JB [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:

Quote:
the fluent 'pretty' French the Guernsey CS girls apparently speak needs a bit of explaining.


The mothers of the Guernsey CS girls (Elizabeth, Anne and Janie Temple) were brought up in France and Janie, at least, spent time at school in Paris. In the Maids of La Rochelle, we're told that Janie is more at home speaking in French than English and when the girls are speaking to each other, it's sometimes written in a way which makes me think EBD wants us to think they're actually speaking French.

Hope that makes some kind of sense. It isn't written in idiomatic English but a direct translation of idiomatic French ie words in a different order. The same device is used with Robin in the early CS books. I'll have a look for an example when I get back!

Author:  Sunglass [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Have never read Maids of La Rochelle, and am fairly ignorant of the backstory of those families - have they always lived on Guernsey and their ancestors before them etc, or are they relatively recent arrivals?

What interested me as that, as with sending the triplets somewhere where a 'variant' French is spoken, but making it plain they learn 'pure' standard French instead, EBD has set up a bunch of characters in a place where a regional Guernsey French was spoken, but then made it very plain that they all speak 'pure' French, not the Guernsey variety that was, presumably, still being spoken around them!

She's clearly quite anxious that her characters speak the 'right' version of any language!

Author:  Tor [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
She's clearly quite anxious that her characters speak the 'right' version of any language!


yes, it seems so. Effectively importing English class-markers to other cultures where they don't normally apply. Iim now imagining the perplexed looks of the continental girls when their English-speaking peers being were being told their accents were unacceptable...

Author:  Mel [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD's anxiety possibly stems from the fact that she herself had to work hard not to slip into South Shieldsisms herself, but one wonders why. I don't think she mixed in the higher ranks of society; from what I have read her world was school, church, publishers and her fans. Fiona, the English are not really obsessed with class,accents and dialects etc. People who sneer at others' speech are narrow-minded, not very clever, humourless, lacking in wonder and curiosity, non-creative, under-confident and must lead very dull lives. Probably lots of other things as well! I suppose we must forgive EBD for being a ghastly snob.

Author:  Tor [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Fiona, the English are not really obsessed with class,accents and dialects etc. People who sneer at others' speech are narrow-minded, not very clever, humourless, lacking in wonder and curiosity, non-creative, under-confident and must lead very dull lives.


I seem to meet a disproportionate number of the above! I think that we are still dealing with the legacy of of a more rampantly snobbish time. Thankfully, the former types are mostly old and soon to die/retire in my profession, so I shan't have to deal with them for too much longer. Shame they currently hold many of the top-dog positions, though!

Quote:
refuse to be polite simply because their accent is different to me is the height of rudeness


Most of those I've encountered aren't refusing to be polite, thy just cannot seem to get it through their heads that their accent/pronunciation isn't 'correct' (as they define it). When you mention about only noticing snobbery from people trying to 'change class' (I remember you expanding on this before), I see that as fairly good evidence that the class issue is still alive and well in the UK. The class-immigrant (for want of a better word) feels the need to go over-board in identifying themselves as belonging to their new class. Those comfortably in their position don't usually trouble themselves until they feel threatened. When, like me, you enter a profession that was once dominated by a single social group (because doing a PhD is expensive without grants and stipends) and now seems to be becoming more and more egalitarian (yay!), some of the old boys get a bit antsy at the changes.

I don't think the UK is any more snobby that other countries - i just think the social markers are different.

Quote:
I suppose we must forgive EBD for being a ghastly snob


Do you know, I often wonder about her friendship with Phyllis whats-her-name. From some of the quotes and comments people have mde on this board from time to time, I wonder if it mightn't have been a bit of a poisonous friendship at times, and that Phyllis might have been the type to make snarky comments about any South Shieldisms that popped out. mad speculation obviously!

But actually I think EBD is typical of her era for not questioning the association between accent and place in the world - middle class and above equalled well-educated (which is not the same as being intelligent/able), and that went along with going to some sort of establishment school. Those schools, like the CS, put emphasis on homogenizing the accents of it pupils, and so there was a accent-marker for having been through that system.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think it's important to remember that EBD wouldn't have considered herself a snob but a crusader against snobbism. She seems to have been trying to combat both those who looked down on scholarship girls, tradesmen's daughters, etc. and the inverse snobs who ridiculed or turned up their noses at persons trying to "better themselves." She seems to have sincerely believed in education as a leveler, in a very positive sense, however much we now see components of the brand of homogeneity she probably thought would help erase barriers as derogatory or patronizing. Doubtless a few years down the road some of our own ideas will seem just as dated. At least we can be pretty certain that EBD ultimately valued kindness and helpfulness more than accent!

Author:  Lottie [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mel wrote:
EBD's anxiety possibly stems from the fact that she herself had to work hard not to slip into South Shieldsisms herself, but one wonders why. I don't think she mixed in the higher ranks of society; from what I have read her world was school, church, publishers and her fans. Fiona, the English are not really obsessed with class,accents and dialects etc. People who sneer at others' speech are narrow-minded, not very clever, humourless, lacking in wonder and curiosity, non-creative, under-confident and must lead very dull lives. Probably lots of other things as well! I suppose we must forgive EBD for being a ghastly snob.

I think English people are quite accepting of regional accents nowadays, but when EBD was starting out as a teacher I'm sure she would have had to lose any hint of a North-eastern accent if she wanted to get a post in a good school somewhere, and certainly to run her own school.

Author:  Emsnan [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
I have to say, on French days, it would have blown my mind slightly to have to get my head and tongue around ''Il faut aller au Saal pour Kaffee und Kuchen a seize heures et puis on a Abendessen a dix-neuf...'


Yes, I used to wonder how they ever coped with this sort of thing, and also their prep. Prep had to be done in whatever language for the day it was, so quite apart from having to be able to write a good essay on, say, the Reformation, in correct French, they might be having to go over it in class on German day. The mind boggles!!

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Have never read Maids of La Rochelle, and am fairly ignorant of the backstory of those families - have they always lived on Guernsey and their ancestors before them etc, or are they relatively recent arrivals?


The Temple girls move their when Janie is in her early teens. Its cheaper than England and both parents have died. Janie had a different mother to Elizabeth and Anne but the older two mother Janie in remembrance to how kind their step mother was to them. Elizabeth names Nella and Vanna (Peronelle and Giovanna) after her mother and step mother. They are friendly with the locals to a degree but are far friendlier with the holiday makers or the upper class people of the island such as Peter Chester, Julian Lucy & family and Paul and Pauline Ozanne.

Anne is a talented painter and paints local scenes whereas Elizabeth write a book full of the local legends. The do remain friendly with the de Garis who are from Guernsey

Author:  trig [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
Interesting point about the place names. I suppose that techincally it should be pronounced according to regular intonation, but that doesn't often seem to be the case. I wonder if the non-native English speakers would pronounce English place names correctly, or if you would get things like 'Vustershire' (odd example, sorry )


The best example! i've often wondered why Worcestershire sauce is pronounced Wuster (at least it is in our house!)

As regards mixed language, I think that EBD just did not think it through sufficiently - one of the advantages of having a fictional school and not a real one! The issue of what language to write prep in does come in somewhere, though. I'm up to Barbara on a read through and I'm sure one of the girls asks if they have to write the History essay in French, that being the language of the day, and they do. I've often felt for the poor History teacher having to trawl through all those essays in French, but from my own experience when both of you are a bit rubbish at a mutually foreign language it is pretty easy to understand. We have several students at my school who come from one of the old French colonies and I speak French to them as their English is dire and I have no knowledge of their own first language. It works pretty well and the rest of my class now know the French for quadrilateral and simultaneous equation (équations simultanées - it sounds so much more sexy!) so everyone benefits.

I do think that people are more relaxed nowadays about accents, but it's surely not just a British thing. My daughter constantly watches Hannah Montana and there was an episode in which she was mocked by rich people for having a Southern hillbillie accent. And as a regular viewer of Frasier it's pretty clear that accent matters in snob circles in the US.

Author:  andydaly [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1373908.stm

Interesting!

Author:  Tor [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

very much so! Thanks andydaly!

Author:  abbeybufo [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

fascinating link - thanks andydaly :D

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Thanks for the link!

Reminds me of the time I was in France, and I tried to order bread from the bakery - it took the, thankfully and randomly present, translator three attempts to make me understand the right money. :oops: I needed Joey!

Author:  andydaly [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Could have been worse....last time I was in France my and my companions' woeful French led to the following misunderstandings:

I thought I was telling the local grocer I wasn't finished shopping yet; I was in fact saying that I was intellectually challenged.

In a local restaurant feeding chat up lines to a friend who was planning to flirt with the waiter - I thought the line I was giving her meant "Please kiss me!". Modesty forbids telling what we were actually planning to ask him.

At the chemists with a friend trying to buy ointment, tried to tell them it was my friend who wanted the ointment; but in fact was telling them that it was my lesbian partner.

My newly established "lesbian partner" then tried to tell them we wanted ointment to prevent, rather than treat heat rash, and ended up asking for condoms.

Chubby Monkey, blush no more!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I was with my aunt and uncle who were seeing me for the first time in years (proper little Chalet girl) so I'm quite glad none of that happened! Well done on re-inforcing all of the English stereotypes, though, andydaly :lol:

I wonder why EBD didn't have a new girl with no French or German taught something like "I think you need to get a new job" and being told it meant "Thankyou for teaching us", and that she had to stand up at the end of lessons and say it to the teacher as a mark of politeness. It would be an original prank!

Author:  andydaly [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Everyone was really nice about it though - gently corrected my mistakes and tried their best not to laugh!

Author:  JS [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Friend of mine on a school exchange trip excused herself from second helpings in France by saying, she thought, that she was full.
Cue silence all round as she had informed them all she was pregnant.

Edited to say that last year in Italy I told a woman in a shop that I was vegetarian so didn't eat fish. Trouble was, my Italian isn't that good so I told her I didn't eat swimming pools! Well, I don't.

Author:  AngelaG [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:
I think it's important to remember that EBD wouldn't have considered herself a snob but a crusader against snobbism. She seems to have been trying to combat both those who looked down on scholarship girls, tradesmen's daughters, etc. and the inverse snobs who ridiculed or turned up their noses at persons trying to "better themselves." She seems to have sincerely believed in education as a leveler, in a very positive sense, however much we now see components of the brand of homogeneity she probably thought would help erase barriers as derogatory or patronizing.


This comes out particularly when Thekla joins the school and EDB makes it very clear that Austrian aristocracy (Marie von E) mixes happily with daughters of tradesman and that this is a Good Thing.

For her time EDB was extremely enlightened as regards class and religion, but things have moved on so much in the last 50 years that she sometimes she appears dated or snobbish.

As regards class and education, a colleague at work is beaming from ear to ear as her son has just got a First in Biology from Oxford. He is state-educated but has always liked science and been a steady hard worker. However, when he was offered a place at Oxford, an acquaintance who teaches at Roedean (posh private all-girls school in Brighton) said there was a quota-system at Oxford for state students that penalised private school pupils from places that they were entitled to. Callum has shown her that he was fully entitled to his place and now is enrolled on a PhD programme too.

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

AngelaG wrote:
an acquaintance who teaches at Roedean (posh private all-girls school in Brighton) said there was a quota-system at Oxford for state students that penalised private school pupils from places that they were entitled to.


Grr. This comp-educated, ex-Oxford biologist (as student, tutor and - once - admissions interviewer) is as narked as you are, Angela. "Entitled to?" how, exactly? (And hurrah for your friend's son!)

On the language front, I have a great story about how my Chinese travelling companion on a train from Shijiazhuang to Zhangjiakou asked me if I liked peanuts - but I'll leave you to guess what his accent made that sound like... suffice it to say that I was confused, terrified and then very, very relieved when said bag of peanuts was eventually produced :lol:

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

It's a leetle gripe of mine, but I do wish the British media would make a bigger effort to pronouce Irish place names and surnames. For example, I get really ticked off when the Gallager brothers' surname is pronounced with a hard g or when the the wrong syllable is sounded for Costello. I also wish they would discontinue the use of Eire for Ireland. Mind you, the Americans murder Irish surnames and place names too.

Author:  Emma A [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

But the Gallagher brothers (assuming you mean those in the rock band Oasis) are not Irish but Mancunian... :twisted:

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Place names can be difficult to pronounce even in your own language, because so many aren't pronounced how they're spelt. The local radio station I listen to once got someone who wasn't originally from the area to do the traffic report whilst the usual person was on holiday, and I kept wondering where on earth she meant because she was making such a mess of the names ... but I suppose if you didn't know that Blackley was pronounced Blakeley, Rawtenstall was pronounced Rottenstall, etc, you'd never guess. You get the same sort of thing in all areas: it's no wonder people get things "wrong".

It was years before I realised that Arkansas was pronounced Arkansaw ...

I wonder what the girls from non-English speaking countries made of all those Shakespeare plays they were made to read: some of Shakespeare's English is hard enough to follow even for a native English speaker :roll: . The same with the "classics": some of Jane Austen's English would have sounded a little strange to 20th century ears, and there's a fair bit of dialect in the Brontes' books which they might not have been familiar with.

Author:  Sunglass [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
It's a leetle gripe of mine, but I do wish the British media would make a bigger effort to pronouce Irish place names and surnames.


Ooh, snap. If the BBC pronunciation unit can sit down and figure out how one should correctly pronounce Morgan Tsvangirai, and newsreaders etc can consult and pronounce accordingly - or if I don't expect to be given a biscuit for getting 'Leicester' or 'Llandudno' right - why can't the same newsreaders manage 'taoiseach'? Or 'Colm Toibin', who was being called 'Colin Toy Bin' at a festival I was at recently! And I was at an event tonight on the South Bank where the Irish actress Rosaleen Linehan was being interviewed, and the theatre critic doing the interviewing pronounced her first name wrong the entire evening.

Kathy_S wrote:
I think it's important to remember that EBD wouldn't have considered herself a snob but a crusader against snobbism.


Sure, she means well, and should be applauded for that. I just think it's important to register that while she's happy to mock continental snobbery such as Thekla's towards 'trade', that she does herself reinscribe elements of the UK class system in her books in things like Reg Entwhistle apparently having to have inherited his desire to be a doctor from a middle-class father who 'married beneath him', and the unpleasant emphasis on 'heredity' in why Joan Baker is never allowed to fit in at the CS.

Not particularly pointing the finger at her for it - she lived in a disgustingly class-ridden society - but I think one of the interesting things about the CBB discussions is being able to look at where EBD's novels undermine or contradict themselves in interesting ways. Class for me is one of the places where her conscious message doesn't always match what she actually writes, and I think the mismatch is really interesting.

Author:  Kathy_S [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

My point is that, for a woman born in 1894, into a society in which "class" was so intrinsic, EBD is pretty forward-thinking. The respect she shows to Reg's auntie and in accepting Reg unreservedly as an appropriate spouse for Len, and her rather blatant placement of Rosamund at a lower socioeconomic status than Joan so that it's clear that it isn't birth that determines whether one can become "a lady," are actually quite remarkable. For me, calling EBD a "snob" is like calling Harriet Beecher Stowe (author of Uncle Tom's Cabin) a "racist." Stowe was an ardent abolitionist whose writing was incredibly important in swaying public opinion against slavery -- even if some of her stereotyping and underlying societal assumptions cause one to wince away today. Although I wouldn't suggest that EBD's influence approached Stowe's, I suspect that without the work of EBD and others like her, the goalposts wouldn't have moved nearly as far.

That doesn't mean it isn't fascinating to use EBD's text as a way to examine changes in attitudes over time or to study her assumptions in conjunction with those of, say, other writers of school stories or the various social strata of her time. And none of us can help finding some of her characters' opinions cringeworthy! It just bothers me that we seem so ready to throw personal brickbats at someone who was actually doing her damnedest for the cause.

***

Just out of curiosity, how would someone without the two hard G's in their Gallagher pronounce it? Jallager? Gallajer? Or maybe the 2nd g is silent? (Sorry. The ones I know probably Americanized their pronunciation over a century ago.)

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Reg's surname is Entwistle with no h! It seems to be the most common spelling error people make with CS characters. I don't know why EBD chose to name a Yorkshireman after a village in Lancashire, but it's definitely spelt without an h :lol: !

As Kathy says, some of the things EBD wrote grate us now, but she was a product of her own times and upbringing. For example, it drives me mad to see 15-year-old girls going to lie down for a rest in Monica Turns Up Trumps as if three hours of lessons would have worn them out, when other girls of their age would have been working a full day in a factory, but I accept that that may have seemed normal to EBD.

The CS girls are a lot nicer than e.g. the Malory Towers girls, who sneer at Felicity's friend (Jo?) because her dad "drops his h"s, or some of the girls at St Clare's who sneer at the matron's daughter (was it Pauline?) as a "charity schoolgirl" because she was getting her education for free because her mother worked there. I used to love the Enid Blyton school stories as a kid, but now I just think I'd've hated to've gone to any of those schools!

Author:  Kate [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Kathy_S wrote:

Just out of curiosity, how would someone without the two hard G's in their Gallagher pronounce it? Jallager? Gallajer? Or maybe the 2nd g is silent? (Sorry. The ones I know probably Americanized their pronunciation over a century ago.)

In Ireland it's pronounced Gallaher.

Author:  Tor [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
My point is that, for a woman born in 1894, into a society in which "class" was so intrinsic, EBD is pretty forward-thinking


I agree and, interestingly, this brings us nicely round full-circle, having taken a quick look at the first few post on this thread (is this the longest FD thread ever?!). It began with just that point, and then all this lovely discussion abut how EBD then manages to undermine a lot of her 'anti-snob' message. As Sunglass said, it's the mismatch that's fascinating.

Quote:
It just bothers me that we seem so ready to throw personal brickbats at someone who was actually doing her damnedest for the cause.


I don't see that anyone has. Credit given when due, and not when not. Criticism is as much of the system she is a product of, at least that is how I have taken it and also how I meant to give it.

However, I make no apologies for calling EBD a snob (if I have anywhere), as I expect that had I met EBD towards the end of her life (i.e. when she was living in an era that had over-taken her in terms of liberal thinking), I think I would have found her a snob. A very nice snob (because these aren't mutually exclusive), but none-the-less someone who probably opened their eyes a little wide, or blanched at a person for being to showy, taking ones tea too strong, and all the other things highlighted in the CS books above. One of the best things about the CS books is that they do seem to crackle with the personality of EBD - even in the later books, sometimes, which redeems them in my opinion - and I think I get a fair sense of the sort of person she'd be, and the sort of people she approved of.

OT again, MJKB I'm really glad you mentiond the Eire/Ireland thing. What is currently 'correct'. I was wondering. And seconding Kathy S' request for enlightenment for correct pronunciations for Gallager (and all the others Irish names/phrases mentionned by Sungalss. I want to know!!!!). But totally true the BBC ought to make the effort, as they seem to manage for the rest of the world (but *do*they...?! Maybe they are mangling all of them)

ETA: crossed with Kate!

Author:  Kate [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass's Irish words:

Taoiseach - tea-shock
Colm Toibin - Collum/Cullum Toe-bean (The first name depends on your Irish dialect, I'd say Cullum.)
Rosaleen is how it's spelled, so I've no idea how they managed to mangle that! But then I'm looking at it from an Irish POV.

Coming from that, it's funny how most Irish people regardless of their level of Irish know fairly instinctively how to read Irish words and place names and when it's pointed out to us how the words would be pronounced in English, we do react with surprise. There was a chat show recently where Stephen Fry pointed out that Dun Laoghaire looks a bit like it should be said "Done Leg Hair" and it kind of does, yet that had never occurred to me before because it's in the "Irish" section of my brain. If that is the case for the non-English EBD girls, I imagine it'd be very difficult to switch from Wien to Vienna or Paree to Paris.

Author:  JS [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Scotland's just as bad - Friockhiem anyone?? (Freekum). It used to annoy me when the BBC could never prounounce the last 'r' in Forfar and pronounced the 'L' in Kirkcaldy (should be Kirkoddy).

My husband (English) says it doesn't matter how he pronounces Scottish place-names, he'll be pilloried for it whereas I (Scots) get away with it!

Author:  Mel [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I did say that EBD was a snob and would stand by it. Certainly Reg, Biddy and Rosamund got on, but we are told that the link with the 'gentry' gave them the necessary good qualities apart from education or brains. Joan Baker and Diana Skelton are never redeemed because their backgrounds held them back from becoming true Chalet girls. In her depictions of working class characters, there are the Tyroleans, who are devout, fatalistic and best of all, adore Madge/Joey so much so that they follow their employers round the globe. Anna indeed, gives up marriage and would lay down her life for Joey. In Britain, EBD falls down badly, by allowing herslef to make working class charactes into comedy turns, such as the galumphing maid at Plas Howells, Grandma, the pyjama-ed copper in Yorkshire etc.
Whether this was to please readers, publishers or to make herself appear extremely well-born I don't know. She is a talented writer and when she writes about religion, she certainly is ahead of her time in her view of 'all roads leading to God' and the idea of a multi-faith school. I'm sure she would have been a very interesting person to meet - though not necessarily likeable.

Author:  Tor [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

thanks Kate!

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

JS wrote:
Scotland's just as bad - Friockhiem anyone?? (Freekum). It used to annoy me when the BBC could never prounounce the last 'r' in Forfar and pronounced the 'L' in Kirkcaldy (should be Kirkoddy).


Well, given that it's BBC policy to mangle the pronounciation of "Shrewsbury," I don't think there's much hope for anywhere further away from London :roll:

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Reg's surname is Entwistle with no h!


Sorry, Alison - was posting tired. I do now know this usually, at least when my brain is fully switched on and I haven't been at two operas and a play within 24 hours, and still managed a day's work! But how awful of me to do it while complaining about other people's mistakes. That'll larn me, as Joey would say...

I'm not pitching any brickbats at EBD, for whom I have only the warmest feelings - as the creator of one of my favourite comfort reads and procrastination devices! As I said in my other comment, I think she deserves plaudits for trying at least to convey the right sentiments in fiction aimed at young girls.

But I don't think, in all sincerity, she is in any way revolutionary for her period. She allows certain token individuals - Biddy O'Ryan, Ros Lilley, Reg EntWIStle :) - to change their place in the system, but the vast majority of her work upholds the class system, possibly mostly unconsciously. Despite the fact that she presents some 'deserving' working-class characters moving up, there's no suggestion that the stratified class system itself has anything wrong with it, or that middle-class table manners, speech, grooming etc aren't (a) naturally superior and (b) 'naturally' desired by the socially inferior. (Joan Baker in her early days at the CS is terribly interesting because, alone of EBD's characters, she doesn't automatically 'recognise' the superiority of middle-class manners, speech, dress etc.)

Yes, there isn't the blatant unself-conscious unpleasantness of Enid Blyton's nouveau riche Jo and her 'awful' roadhog father with his caricature red face, no manners and no hs, or the treatment of Ern in the Five Find-outers books, where he is 'naturally' sent to eat in the kitchen. (Though I agree with Mel on the working-class comedy turns in EBD.) But while EBD talks the talk about Jesus being born into a humble family, and Adam and Eve being (sort of) subsistence farmers, in practice, she upholds class shibboleths throughout the CS. It doesn't surprise me, and I don't blame her particularly for it. She's not an iconoclast (quite the reverse!), I just think the mismatch of 'message' and 'means' is worthy of being looked at, in the way it's been looked at on this (long!) discussion.

I make no apologies for calling her a snob either, but I'd add as a caveat that my feeling is that, like many snobs, she does this out of a slight feeling of class insecurity, rather than superiority. Or it's the slightly precarious 'superiority' of someone who knows the rules and obeys them to the letter for fear of the consequences, and is thus doubly horrified to see someone else happily speaking with their mouth full in a regional accent while drinking very strong tea - doesn't she realise what people will think?

'Taoiseach' is pronounced, roughly, like this - though Irish is strongly regional within Ireland:

http://forvo.com/languages-pronunciatio ... tically/T/

This is actually quite a useful website for pronunciation in general in lots of different languages - though I wouldn't take it as gospel - and you can rate the pronunciations offered or upload clips of yourself saying the word in question.

Author:  trig [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
OT again, MJKB I'm really glad you mentiond the Eire/Ireland thing. What is currently 'correct'. I was wondering. And seconding Kathy S' request for enlightenment for correct pronunciations for Gallager (and all the others Irish names/phrases mentionned by Sungalss. I want to know!!!!). But totally true the BBC ought to make the effort, as they seem to manage for the rest of the world (but *do*they...?! Maybe they are mangling all of them)


The BBC often have odd pronunciations for many place-names - the way the newsreaders pronounce Iraq and Pakistan always sounds very strange. But in their defence people would accuse them of pretension if they were to say Moskva and Paree, so if it's OK to anglicise these, why not Irish places?

I agree with Sunglass as to EBD's stance on class, although she was certainly more broadminded than many of her contempories. Her stance seems to depend more on acceptable behaviours rather than backgrounds. Therefore the more flexible Rosamund is accepted whereas staunch working-class Joan is not.

On this topic, while some posters have said that Rosamund is seen to be in a lower socioeconomic bracket than Joan, I always read it that this was Joan's view rather than the establishment view. One of the fascinating and odd things about the English class system was that people living on the same street and earning the same wage could be seen as different classes purely on the grounds of what they did or how they spoke. EBD's real prejudice was probably against loud, pushy people from all walks of life...

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Are we ever told what Mr Baker did for a living? It's not in my pb, but I think it's one of the books that's badly cut.

I think most people would have accepted that Mrs Baker, having worked in a shop, could consider herself a cut above Mrs Lilley, who'd been in service. Then again, if Mrs Lilley had been a lady's maid, as opposed to e.g. a parlourmaid, maybe she could consider herself a cut above Mrs Baker depending on what sort of shop Mrs B'd worked in ... :lol: :lol: :lol: .

People living in the same street considering themselves to be of different classes - well, if the Bakers didn't have net curtains and Mrs Baker never donkey-stoned her front step properly, they would definitely have dropped below the Lilleys in the pecking order :lol: . The Bakers also fail on the question of homemade cakes: we are told that Joan eats shop-bought cake :lol: . Even worse, she a) eats it in the street and b) "wolfs" it down instead of eating it properly :shock: .

It's not just the working class people either: Mrs Trelawney evidently considers herself to be superior to most other people in the village and is always trying to make sure that Mary-Lou doesn't associate with anyone "unsuitable"; and Madge drags everyone back from the Mondscheinspitze at crack of dawn so that no-one will see them with messy hair and crumpled clothes, and is always telling Joey off for using unladylike language. & Thekla is obsessed with her own social status.

Just trying to think which of the CS characters didn't seem unduly worried about their position/respectability and how they appeared to others! Maybe the von Eschenaus, who were posh enough for no-one to question their place in society but didn't seem as worried about it as Thekla did? Even though Anita Rincini and even Gisela say that it would look good for the school if the von Eschenaus, as daughters of a count, were pupils there.

Sorry for the essay!

ETA - none of that's meant as a criticism of anyone - we're probably all as bad, and even if we aren't we would have been in the '30s/'40s/'50s!

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
why can't the same newsreaders manage 'taoiseach'?


Glad you agree! Yes, the pronunciation of taoiseach was a bit of a horror especially when CJ Haughey was in the post and he was known as 'Charles Hock key'. I think remembering that gh in Ireland is usually a soft g sound is not that difficult to take on board.

Author:  Sunglass [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:

It's not just the working class people either: Mrs Trelawney evidently considers herself to be superior to most other people in the village and is always trying to make sure that Mary-Lou doesn't associate with anyone "unsuitable"; and Madge drags everyone back from the Mondscheinspitze at crack of dawn so that no-one will see them with messy hair and crumpled clothes...


Yes, absolutely - only it seems much funnier when you put them together like that! :D EBD does seem to worry about damaged clothes making you look lower-class in public...

Actually there's one bit in Jean of Storms that's odd and interesting from the POV of thinking about respectability, class and clothes - it's when Jean and her aunt find out that Kirsty has been badly mistreated by her other relatives, and is underweight and frightened of being touched. All that part is genuinely shocking, and horribly realistic for EBD. The thing that sits very oddly with that, though, is how much attention EBD gives to Kirsty's clothes, which I would have said were the least of her problems:

Quote:
Jean was disgusted at the sight and feeling of the rough and ready clothes she wore. Allison was as plainly dressed as could be but she wore the best of everything. Kirsty was clad in home-knitted knickers, vest and stockings... She had only flannelette nightdresses and they were forced to put her into one till they could get us some of the little sleeping suits of the soft Indian cotton than Allison always wore.


Quote:
She exhibited a small pile of underthings and Mollie regarded them with wondering eyes.
"What on earth do you want to show me these for? Are they for one of Oona's protégés?"
"No! These are Kirsty things," said Jean in a choked voice.
"Kirsty’s?" Mollie picked one up and felt it. Then, she suddenly flung it down. "Jean! You can't mean it! Why it's the kind of thing the very poor put on their children. And anyway, her sleeping suit seems all right."
"She wore a flannelette nightgown of the vilest pink last night," said Jean.


Kirsty has been half-starved and neglected - and possibly beaten, as she's so frightened of being touched - but what Jean seems to get really outraged about is that she's being dressed like a working-class child, even down to her 'vile pink' nightdress of cheap fabric! That's clearly genuinely horrifying in EBD's world, that a middle-class child is 'demoted' by her carers. But I suppose we should have expected it, as Kirsty's aunt has 'a marked Hampshire accent that grated on Jean', and talks about money all the time, so is clearly Not the Right Sort.

Alison H wrote:

Just trying to think which of the CS characters didn't seem unduly worried about their position/respectability and how they appeared to others!


Adult Joey, some of the time, at moments I think we're supposed to feel rather admiring of - like when she's sitting on the gate in an old frock in Jo to the Rescue and Zephyr Burthill doesn't believe at frirst that she is talking to Mrs Maynard: 'But Mrs Maynard is a lady! A doctor's wife!' But Joey is so socially secure as Great Doctors' Wife and Sister-in-Law she doesn't have to 'keep up appearances' in private. Though it's noticeable in the same book that when she has to travel to the nearest town on a very hot day, she still gets into a formal tweed suit, even though she's terribly hot in it...

I supose we've lost that sense of your clothes classing you to that extent.

Author:  MJKB [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
I supose we've lost that sense of your clothes classing you to that extent.


Have we though? Aren't the 'right shoes' still the acid test?
With regard to class distinctions in the CS I'm of two minds. Joan Baker is a case in point. On the one hand I admire her for holding on to her grass roots,and for her iconoclasm, on the other hand, sheis rough, vulgar and a natural bully. Her language is pretty foul and her idea are seen as challenging to the CS ethos The snobbery lies in the EBD's view that Joan's lack of refinement is a product of her social class rather than her natural disposition. Like many others I find it disappointing that naturally refined people like Ros Lilley are seen to be that way because of their contact with 'gentle folk.'
I also dislike the CS middle class assumption that employees should be fiercely loyal to their employers. I think it's quite sad to think that Anna's whole life is devoted to the Maynard family.

Author:  Lesley [ Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think one thing that does annoy me about the way that EBD portrays the lower classes is the way that any of them that show anything in the way of good manners, intelligence etc, always has to have this explained by the fact that they have some relationship with their 'betters'. So Biddy O'Ryan has dainty table manners because her mother copied Miss Honora, her employer, snap for Rosamund who was taught by her mother who was in service, and Reg Entwistle got his brains because his father was from a higher social standing.

I appreciate that it was the way many thought during those times - but surely at least one lower class person could have got there because their own family placed high regard on education, cleanliness and manners? My family - both sides, did and we were unashamedly working class.

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lesley wrote:
but surely at least one lower class person could have got there because their own family placed high regard on education, cleanliness and manners?

The Irish diaspora made enormous sacrifices in order to educate their children, but that was to ensure the next generation would get into positions of power. Education was seen as the only route into the middle classes, so if you were not particularly academic your opportunity for power, prestige and privillage was vastly reduced. I often wonder what would have happened to Biddy had she not been so intelligent. It was precisely because she was so obviously bright that the school decided to educate her as one of their own. In fairness, her good manners may have been attributed to her mother's relationship with 'Lady Honora', but her intelligence is seen as an integral part of her own make up.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

trig wrote:
The BBC often have odd pronunciations for many place-names - the way the newsreaders pronounce Iraq and Pakistan always sounds very strange. But in their defence people would accuse them of pretension if they were to say Moskva and Paree, so if it's OK to anglicise these, why not Irish places?


Because the Irish placenames are already virtually always in English, unlike Moskva and 'Paree' - the Irish-language placenames were anglicised by a British ordnance survey in the 1830s - so they are already anglicised, like Moscow or Paris. Dublin is 'Baile Atha Cliaith' in Irish, but no Irish person would use that name unless they were speaking Irish, or would expect a foreigner to use it. So it's not quite the same situation. And mispronouncing the title of the Irish prime minister-equivalent when you're reporting on the Good Friday Agreement is unforgiveable.

MJKB wrote:
Sunglass wrote:
I supose we've lost that sense of your clothes classing you to that extent.


Have we though? Aren't the 'right shoes' still the acid test?


No idea - You're asking the wrong person! I wear Birkenstocks to the ROH and expect the people in the expensive seats to deal with it!

I always wonder about Biddy too and to what extent she recognised consciously at the village school and then at the CS that her cleverness was her way out of a future which involved being trained for domestic service...

Author:  Tor [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
No idea - You're asking the wrong person! I wear Birkenstocks to the ROH and expect the people in the expensive seats to deal with it!


But, daaaahling, no one dresses up at the ROH anymore. Glyndebourne maybe... :wink:

I think EBD is fairly consistent in her application of approved dress-code across class boundaries - neatness over all else. Plain clothes of the highest quality you can afford. The worst sin is to be flashy, the second worst to be dirty (if you combine flashy *and* dirty then, well, heaven help your soul). It just riles me that there is an element of 'know your place' snobbery in this criteria - don't try to ape your betters.

Author:  Sunglass [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
But, daaaahling, no one dresses up at the ROH anymore. Glyndebourne maybe... :wink:.


And a very good thing too! It seems to vary a bit at the ROH, as far as I can judge. I thought it was getting more casual, but then I happened to be in an upper box for a Tosca dress rehearsal this week - with a better view of the rest the house than the stage! who pays that much money for half a sideways view? :o - and the stalls were all 'posh rural wedding c 1987', at 11 o'clock on a Monday morning, in the middle of a working rehearsal with the orchestra and tech staff all wearing teeshirts and shorts! :roll:

Tor wrote:
I think EBD is fairly consistent in her application of approved dress-code across class boundaries - neatness over all else. Plain clothes of the highest quality you can afford. The worst sin is to be flashy, the second worst to be dirty (if you combine flashy *and* dirty then, well, heaven help your soul). It just riles me that there is an element of 'know your place' snobbery in this criteria - don't try to ape your betters.


Yes, 'bright' is never a clothing colour choice EBD approves of, or heavily trimmed. Although towards the end of the series, some of the fabrics and dresses do sound a bit flashy compared with earlier - even the new CS uniform, but mostly I'm thinking of things like Adrienne's yellow nylon dress embroidered with sprays of green leaves, which sounds lurid and static-y!

Author:  Tor [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
but then I happened to be in an upper box for a Tosca dress rehearsal this week - with a better view of the rest the house than the stage! who pays that much money for half a sideways view? :o


Yes I know, but sometimes they do work out at fairly affordable, cmpared with average west-end ticket prices that is (if you fill it, it can be £40 per head, if I remember rightly).

Lats few performances I've been to have been mostly full of people directly from work, so office smart but no more (I was 'dressed up' for an academic, which put me a couple of rungs below office smart I suppose). The best thing about the boxes is you can spot people playing with their i-phones in the audience :roll:

Author:  MJKB [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
I always wonder about Biddy too and to what extent she recognised consciously at the village school and then at the CS that her cleverness was her way out of a future which involved being trained for domestic service...


I'd say she was very conscious indeed! Having run off half way across Europe ( Iexaggerate for effect) to avoid being incarcerated in an orphange, she wasn't going to end up as someone's 'loyal and faithful' servant'. No, Biddy had the 'glic' of her Kerry forbears. I admore her more than Ros Lilley because she is pretty feisty and she never comes across as enormously grateful to her benefactors.

Author:  Nightwing [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

On a slight tangent from the current topic of conversation, but I've been thinking about this all night:

On reflection, it seems to me that EBD definitely wasn't trying to break away from the class system, but to her the importance of treating people well went beyond the rigidities of social order. The treatment of Grandma in particular struck me - she may have been a 'comic' character, and Bill may have shuddered at the way she took her tea, but nevertheless Bill treats her concerns absolutely seriously; she doesn't snub her by telling her it's none of her business which she could have easily done.

Rosamund Lilley is scared that people will look down on her because she's a scholarship girl, and she has good reason to think this. But (if I'm remembering correctly) when she finally tells someone she's there on a scholarship they simply say 'lucky you'. While EBD may have seen the working-class as inferior, to actually consciously treat them as such was, to her, a terrible behaviour to indulge in.

Author:  Alison H [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

That's very true :D . We get that right from the start, when we're told that Marie Pfeifen enjoys working for Madge because Madge is kind to her, makes the girls be polite to her and shows an interest in her family. Madge's behaviour might seem patronising now, but by the standards of the time it made her a much better employer than most of the people whom Marie's friends worked for, as EBD says.

Same with James H Kettlewell - Madge is pleasant towards him, and, whilst again that might not seem a big deal to us now, other people - such as Mrs Cochrane - wouldn't have reacted in that way.

I admire Biddy more than Ros too, but at 14-ish you have to be a very strong character, which Ros wasn't - although Joan was -, to be the odd one out long term. It's the same with most of the girls who start off being different in one way or another and end up assimilating. I do wonder what it was like for Ros when she went home in the holidays and her way of speaking was no longer the same as that of the rest of her family, though.

Author:  Lottie [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
I do wonder what it was like for Ros when she went home in the holidays and her way of speaking was no longer the same as that of the rest of her family, though.

I think it would have been all right for Rosamund at home, because her family were proud of her achievement in getting a scholarship to the CS, and I think they would have seen any change in her speech as part of how it was helping her to get a good education. Ros would probably have had a lot more trouble from Kath Stevens(?) and the rest of her friends from school - I expect that they would have given her a very hard time if they thought she'd turned too posh!

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Lottie wrote:
Alison H wrote:
I do wonder what it was like for Ros when she went home in the holidays and her way of speaking was no longer the same as that of the rest of her family, though.

I think it would have been all right for Rosamund at home, because her family were proud of her achievement in getting a scholarship to the CS, and I think they would have seen any change in her speech as part of how it was helping her to get a good education. Ros would probably have had a lot more trouble from Kath Stevens(?) and the rest of her friends from school - I expect that they would have given her a very hard time if they thought she'd turned too posh!


But did Joan herself say that Rosamund said she was speaking la-di-da but knew all she had done was lose some of her Hampshire accent and that Mrs Lilley had always insisted on her children to speak nicely.

And in regards to clothes, I have heard so many accounts of people mistaking the local Lord and Ladies for servants because they were wandering around their estates in their oldest clothes and didn't look like who they were meant to be. It's something I've always found that those who have the money, the class etcetera don't flaunt it and the one who are trying to hard to be something they are not do.

In EBD land, Elisaveta and the Von Eshenau girls who do have all of that are never snobby in the least to the point Elisaveta will clean houses to support her family and protect Aliette and her children. Joey whom yes doesn't always look like Mrs Doctor Maynard does tend to have that slightly snobbish side to her at times such as saying of course Reg got his wish for being a doctor from his father, whereas Marie or Elisaveta never says anything like that at all

Author:  Sunglass [ Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Nightwing wrote:
While EBD may have seen the working-class as inferior, to actually consciously treat them as such was, to her, a terrible behaviour to indulge in.


I think that's absolutely right, and a likeable and genuinely progressive thing in EBD, as it is with the way her major characters behave to various domestic staff, and James H Kettlewell and others. I would say, though, that some of that considerate behaviour does depend, I think, on those socially-inferior people being well-disposed/ efficient/ basically right-thinking in EBD's main characters' opinion/ admiring/'knowing their place'.

Efficient, adoring Anna is treated 'like one of the family' - and my quotation marks are deliberate! - but there's much more class-specific disdain in relation to less perfect servants, like the clumsy sniffing 'farm-girl' CS parlourmaid in one of the Welsh books, or the Chesters' 'stupid' barely-literate maid in Janie Steps In who keeps being told 'don't speak' by Janie every time she opens her mouth. And Grandma, whatever her tastes in tea, is largely in sympathy with the CS philosophy so it's no stretch for either EBD or Bill to behave 'well' to her. A working-class person who either wasn't well-disposed towards the CS or who wasn't a 'good' servant would be more of a challenge, and it doesn't really happen, bar Joan Baker, who is not presented at all sympathetically, because she is 'undeserving' or 'jumped-up' working-class - although we do get inside her head, which I think is a big leap for EBD, and for which she should be applauded.

And of course another difference there is that Joan isn't a servant or a peasant or someone chance-met on a train - she's in a condition of equality with the other CS girls, which makes the kind of incident-specifc (and fairly short in length?) good behaviour EBD praises in Madge towards James H Kettlewell much more of a stretch,

Is the CS's reception of Joan of a piece with the 'good behaviour to all, even social inferiors' philosophy?

There's certainly a lack of the sheer nastiness of the 'Cuckoo''s reception by the other girls in Angela Briazil's For the Sake of the School...

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

What struck me about the CS was the lack of manners that they themselves could show on occasion. There is obviously the incident with Frau Berlin, and though it's six of one, it's still remarkably ill behaved. One major example that I can think of is refusing to give up the corner seat on the train which happens at least twice IIRC. Surely if the other person needed it more, it would have been more polite to give it up?

I agree that EBD was remarkably forward thinking for her time, but there was still an element of class snobbery, IMHO, in that her middle class schoolgirls/mistresses could do no wrong, no matter how they behaved towards those lower than them.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think the middle class girls doing no wrong thing is closely linked with the creation of the character of Joan. The problems with Joan are not because of her social background, but because of her behaviour and attitude, which are considered "cheap" (Mary-Lou's word) by CS standards. But why couldn't EBD have introduced a character who wore "unsuitable" clothes and too much make-up, talked about boys and used the occasional swear word without having to make that character someone from a different social class to most of the other girls?

I bet Yseult Pertwee had some "unsuitable" clothes and make-up to go with her picturesque hairstyle, Emerence when she first arrived was rude and cheeky and I bet she wasn't averse to using the odd swear word, and Janice and Judy mention that some of their friends at home have boyfriends, but we never see any of that at the school. Behaviour considered to be common/vulgar has to come from a girl from a working class family.

Enid Blyton does something similar with Zerelda in MT, except in her case it's nationality rather than class - she makes Zerelda an American character, as if it's unthinkable that a British girl would wear "unsuitable" clothes and too much make up :roll: !

I feel sorry for Frau Berlin. It's very upsetting when someone speaks audibly about how fat you are. When Herr Marani tells Joey off about her remarks, Joey says "She is fat, isn't she?" as if the fact that someone's overweight makes it OK to be rude about them. I'd really like to've seen Frau B come back and take her revenge at some point! Sorry, that was totally irrelevant :oops: .

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
I think the middle class girls doing no wrong thing is closely linked with the creation of the character of Joan. The problems with Joan are not because of her social background, but because of her behaviour and attitude, which are considered "cheap" (Mary-Lou's word) by CS standards. But why couldn't EBD have introduced a character who wore "unsuitable" clothes and too much make-up, talked about boys and used the occasional swear word without having to make that character someone from a different social class to most of the other girls?


But although Janice and Judy mention they have friends with boyfriends it doesn't take over the conversation the way it does with Joan. They do stop it before it goes too far in Adrienne. The problem is I can imagine Joan very easily as there were a number of girls like that in our school and I could see them never completely reforming. However I do lose sympathy with her as Joan is a nasty bully to Rosamund whereas most Joans at our school were pretty nice, they were never fake and rarely did the bullying. That seemed to fall to the so called nice middle class kind of girls

Alison H wrote:
I bet Yseult Pertwee had some "unsuitable" clothes and make-up to go with her picturesque hairstyle, Emerence when she first arrived was rude and cheeky and I bet she wasn't averse to using the odd swear word, and Janice and Judy mention that some of their friends at home have boyfriends, but we never see any of that at the school. Behaviour considered to be common/vulgar has to come from a girl from a working class family.


But Yseult was also even more rejected than Joan was. Once Joan stopped swearing at the mistresses, being rude to everyone and stopped playing up in class and bullying Rosamund she was accepted reasonably well. It only seems Ricki turned her nose up at her. The others I think it fell more into, they were interested in clothes and make-up and boys the way Joan was so didn't have the common ground to turn the relationship into anything more than friendly aquaintances whereas Yseult they barely tolerated. And Emmerence wasn't accepted initially until she reformed. I think the biggest thing is all these girls are difficult but not in ways the school has ever had to deal with before. I think Jack nails it when he said Joan belonged to the group of girls who normally leave school at 15 and so think of these things earlier than most. That's exactly what happened in my school when I was young. All the "Joan's" left at Form 4 or 5 and none went on to do HSC/VCE (A levels). And he does say to make allowances for her for that. It is emphasized that the school and the main families do like to keep the girls young and although they are responsible for a lot at a young age, they are young in others. I can see Joan being able to cope with the real world better than the others all would simply because she was more wordly

Alison H wrote:
I feel sorry for Frau Berlin. It's very upsetting when someone speaks audibly about how fat you are. When Herr Marani tells Joey off about her remarks, Joey says "She is fat, isn't she?" as if the fact that someone's overweight makes it OK to be rude about them. I'd really like to've seen Frau B come back and take her revenge at some point! Sorry, that was totally irrelevant :oops: .


I don't think Joey would ever understand how rude and hurtful she was as she never got fat. If she had maybe she would have been more apologetic. what always got me about that was how much she told Grizel off for being rude to Frau Berlin when she was equally as rude herself earlier

Author:  Nightwing [ Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Fiona Mc wrote:
I don't think Joey would ever understand how rude and hurtful she was as she never got fat. If she had maybe she would have been more apologetic. what always got me about that was how much she told Grizel off for being rude to Frau Berlin when she was equally as rude herself earlier


Not that this excuses Joey but EBD is always going on about how fat or skinny people are! And unfortunately she was writing in a time when using overweight characters as comic relief was perfectly acceptable (not that this doesn't still happen today, and it always makes my blood boil!!!). I only read a couple of GO authors but this does seem to be a trend in the books I've read. There's Lady Blantosh in the Sadler's Wells series; and it's been a while since I read any Enid Blyton but I do distinctly remember the fat girl nicknamed 'Pudding' in the last St Clare's book...

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Nightwing wrote:
Fiona Mc wrote:
I don't think Joey would ever understand how rude and hurtful she was as she never got fat. If she had maybe she would have been more apologetic. what always got me about that was how much she told Grizel off for being rude to Frau Berlin when she was equally as rude herself earlier


Not that this excuses Joey but EBD is always going on about how fat or skinny people are! And unfortunately she was writing in a time when using overweight characters as comic relief was perfectly acceptable (not that this doesn't still happen today, and it always makes my blood boil!!!). I only read a couple of GO authors but this does seem to be a trend in the books I've read. There's Lady Blantosh in the Sadler's Wells series; and it's been a while since I read any Enid Blyton but I do distinctly remember the fat girl nicknamed 'Pudding' in the last St Clare's book...


And the poor girl had thyroid problems and no one gave her any sympathy even when the knew. I do find their interests on what constitues heavy weird, especially as I would consider Nancy light at 10stones especially at the height she is and yet she's always described as being plump

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Gold star for Jem here! According to a letter Josette writes to Len, when Madge is upset by some insensitive jokes about her weight causing the ceiling to fall in (in Joey & Co) and announces that she's going to a health farm to try to lose weight before Peggy's wedding, Jem tells her that he likes her just the way she is.

He comes in for a lot of criticism, but he deserves some credit for that - obviously he's much more of a gentleman than some of the CS girls (and grown women, when they start making remarks about people's weight in Reunion) are ladies :lol: .

Author:  Mel [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The irony is that photographs of EBD show that she was no skinigallee herself! Also I don't think she had much idea of actual weight if she refers to Nancy as 10st. People then didn't have scales in their bathrooms, but doctors would do the weighing and possibly Matey. Probably for most of EBD's life, being under-weight was the problem with its suggestion of poverty and frailty. How different today when to be fat suggests ignorance and poverty!

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Nightwing wrote:
Not that this excuses Joey but EBD is always going on about how fat or skinny people are! And unfortunately she was writing in a time when using overweight characters as comic relief was perfectly acceptable (not that this doesn't still happen today, and it always makes my blood boil!!!)

This came up before, so excuse my bringing it up again, but red haired people are the current butt if many comedians' jokes. People will always find laughing at others for some perceived abberation funny. It took me years to overcome jokes about my height - I'm just 5' - and many people thought they had a God given right to comment rudely on it. Mind you, it was often those, especially men, who were a few inches taller who were the worst!
Returning to the class theme, if no social class difference is apparent society will always find some difference to exploit be it personal attractiveness, weight, height, intelligence, etc, etc. In the smallest social group a pecking order emerges. My school is disadvantaged, 90% come from the same local authority area and still differences emerge. We stream in senior cycle, although we're trying to bring in some form of mixed ability, and the top stream stick together and rarely mix with the bottom stream. The teachers openly talk about the 'good kids' meaning the bright kids, and alot of them regard themselves as socially superior because of their educational advantages.


Double post deleted by Lottie with mod hat on.

Author:  Loryat [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

For me the most offensive class things about EBD are partly the way the servants seem to be utter morons most of the time, and even if not are slavishly devoted, and partly (as others have mentioned) the way any working class person with good manners or whatever has got them because they came into contact with the upper classes as a servant. (Biddy and Ros's mothers, and Grandma, who has 'pretty handwriting' because she picked it up from working as a maid). On the other hand Joan's mum is a bit common and worked in a shop - ie didn't have the opportunity to pick up any social graces and isn't 'well bred' enough to know that you shouldn't be snobbish.

For me, it's this idea that is also offensive - for example another snob is that girl from the other Chalet School, and her dad was working class, and I also get that impression about Zephyr Burthill. Real Chalet girls know that these things don't matter - but then why do the Chesters disapprove of Beth's companions at the school she goes to before she goes to the CS? The bit that really takes the biscuit is when Joey watches out for signs of snobbishness in Rosamund - who does she think she is?

Author:  Tor [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
isn't 'well bred' enough to know that you shouldn't be snobbish.
For me, it's this idea that is also offensive - for example another snob is that girl from the other Chalet School, and her dad was working class, and I also get that impression about Zephyr Burthill. Real Chalet girls know that these things don't matter


Oooh! Good point! Very interesting, mind-bending point. EBD is down on snobbery, and yet has plenty of examples of snobbery in action that aren't considered/presented as such (she preaches more consistently than she practices, I guess you could say). But you are so right, the majority of 'snobs' seem to be those who are wan-to-be social climbers, and is seen, in itself, as evidence of their lack of good breeding (and seemingly linked to class).

Is Thekla the only snob who isn't also a bit of a class-upstart? The Saint's girl who writes to Elisaveta's dad, and worships Elaine because she is the daughter of a Baronet or whatever, what is her background...?

Now, whilst it is true that people who are insecure in their social positions can be more vehement in their snobbery, it is interesting that EBD is picking up on this and working it into her stories, as a number of us have hinted (said outright, in my case, I think) that we think she might be just such a person...!

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Tor wrote:
Is Thekla the only snob who isn't also a bit of a class-upstart? The Saint's girl who writes to Elisaveta's dad, and worships Elaine because she is the daughter of a Baronet or whatever, what is her background...?



Vera's dad "made a fortune" during the First World War. He wasn't exactly described as being a war profiteer as such, but the Smithers family were definitely nouveaux riches :lol: .

All very realistic, really. People who were secure in their place in society, so to speak, like Marie and Wanda, had nothing to prove. Vera must have felt that she did.

I always get the impression that the Russells and the Maynards were both a little above the Bettanys in the social pecking order, so both Madge and Joey married "well", but that might just be me ...

Author:  JS [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

But Dick snaffled the boss's daughter, so presumably that was a pretty good match too. Listen to me - you can tell I've been on a Jane Austen re-read :roll:

Author:  Tor [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I've always taken it that Madge and Joey 'married up'! The Russel's are a shady bunch, so it is hard to be sure that Jem didn't raise the capital for the San by nefarious means rather than simply coming from a well-to-do background, but Jack has an ancestral pad of a sort that could be donated to the National Trust.

The Bettany's may not have been very rich, but I always imagine that they were 'somebodies' in India before their death, with Dick perhaps getting a bit of a leg-up in the Forestry Commission. Maybe Mollie's father was an old colleague of Mr Bettany senior.....?

Author:  Mel [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I always thought that the Bettanys were poorer than the other families. I'm always surprised that there is no mention of Jem's childhood home. According to Chalet Land rules, it should have been grander than Jack's.

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mel wrote:
According to Chalet Land rules, it should have been grander than Jack's.


Why? I can't work that one out. As for the Bettanys, I always thought they were upper middle class colonialists with connections to Major this and General that. They obviously lost alot of money but that wouldn't interfere with their social position, or would it?

Author:  Tor [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
They obviously lost alot of money but that wouldn't interfere with their social position, or would it?


I got the impression from School at that their position in the local community was fairly middling, with Jo attending the local High School, for example. So, like you, MJKB I had them pegged as middle class. I figured that over in India, they may have occupied a position of greater importance that the one Dick and Madge had in Devon/Cornwall, due to Mr Bettany Senior's job. No evidence whatsoever for this, of course!

I don't know why, but the mentions of the Aunts in London in various Tirol books seems to make me feel that the Bettany's were more lower-middle than upper middle. I have images of the aunts living on the same street in terraced houses, with husbands who were bank clerks. Don't ask me why, but that is the image I have in my head!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I agree that the Bettanys are always written as being slightly lower than the Russels and Maynards - perhaps it is because Dick is not a doctor! But they just get a nice house they inherit in Devon (I keep meaning to go and visit the location, actually) while the Russels/Maynards own several houses and live in exotic loactions, which I think would probably help place them higher up the standing, especially for child readers.

But then I guess Dick would be more proud of what he had acheived, doing it all himself, than say Madge or Joey - who does still go on about having no money after the war :roll: - because he'd earned his (for the main part, I always think that marrying Molly would have helped him a bit) while for the other two it is nearly all down to who they marry.

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

ChubbyMonkey wrote:

But then I guess Dick would be more proud of what he had acheived, doing it all himself, than say Madge or Joey - who does still go on about having no money after the war :roll: - because he'd earned his (for the main part, I always think that marrying Molly would have helped him a bit) while for the other two it is nearly all down to who they marry.


It does annoy me though - not that I've got anything against Dick and Mollie - that Dick conveniently inherits a big house from (I think) his godfather, rather than having to make his own way when he comes back to England. Simone and André conveniently inherit a big house and a business and a lot of money too, although I'm always glad for Simone because I think EBD gave her a hard time at school. I know that this is what happens and that money breeds money and all the rest of it, but it's always so easy for so many of them. Maybe I'm just jealous :lol: .

Author:  Emma A [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

M M Kaye suggests that certain types of Brits might have gone out to India during the Raj in the hope of obtaining a better way of life and social status than they would have received in the UK. Ruby Stock, for example, in Death in the Andamans, made up a story for herself when she and her husband moved to the Andamans which of course no-one could disprove.

There was also a distinct hierarchy of expats during the British occupation of India - the Foreign and Political Service were also known as the "Heaven-Born", and they were streets ahead of the Army in terms of social status. I don't know where the Forestry would have been in this social scale - fairly low down, I suspect.

Author:  Mel [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I thought we were talking about the Bettany Maynard Russell families and their forebears. I imagined that Jem's family would be grander because Jem is older, Head of the San, marries Madge and is the great Sir Jem. I suppose Dick inherits because he is a man, but very lucky and convenient for him!

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The Quadrant sounds rather a grand house, almost stately house size so there must have been a few quid lurking in the family background.
Unlike Tor, I got the impression that the aunts lived in a fairly smart part of London, Belgravia or South Keningston at the least, though not knowing the pecking order of smart London address perhaps Kensington was more middle middle than upper middle in those days.
However, the fact that both girls attended local high schools instead of boarding school would suggest a middle middle class background.
As for Jem and Jack surely they are from the same social class. Pretty Maids which Jack eventually inherits sounds like the local squire's house. Jem's ancestral home is not described or is it?

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

We're told mysteriously little about Jem's background :roll: . AFAIK we're never even told which part of the country he comes from. I always get the impression that he came from a fairly well to do family, though. He certainly seems to have a lot of "connections".

Madge and Joey's aunts are described as having "large families and small means". Why EBD didn't bring some of their grandchildren into the Swiss books instead of coming up the various bizarre connections we get instead I don't know! "Small means" could mean anything, though - Joey describes herself and Madge as being "frightfully poor" which they're certainly not by most people's standards, and they might each have ... how does Jane Austen put it when she's talking about Mr Bingley's married sister? "Married a gentleman of more fashion than fortune" or words to that effect!

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Madge and Joey's aunts are described as having "large families and small means".
I'd forgotten that the aunts were married. So Madge and Joey would have had several cousins. I wonder why they were never introduced in the books.

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

They always refer to visiting "the aunts", which sort of makes them sound like two little old single ladies with lace caps (does to me, anyway :lol: ), but as they had large families Madge and Joey must have been lots of cousins. Jem also has aunts (he mentions them when talking about the Elsie books), and Jack presumably had some relatives other than his parents and siblings as well.

I suppose EBD didn't want to keep mentioning lots of non-CS characters, but it would have seemed a lot more plausible had some of these cousins (or their children) turned up in the Swiss books, when there seemed to be a rule that all new characters had to have CS connections, than for Joey to be appointed guardian of the daughter of someone she'd known briefly 20 years earlier, Maisie Gomme (who had nothing to do with Joey in Rivals) to have decided that Joey should be her daughter's unofficial godmother, and so on!

Sorry, a bit OT :oops: .

Author:  Tor [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I'm not sure it is *entirely* OT, in that I think that the lack of those Bettany cousins in the CS books in some ways has fed my idea of the social position of the Bettany Clan. It's like Madge and Co left their old family behind and carved a new social niche for themselves.

Even though the reality is that EBD probably just forgot about them, you'd think it would have made a fairly staple CS plot to offer the girl cousins at least places at the CS....? They took on Biddy, helped out Reg, Simone and Renée were supported by Mlle etc etc

Author:  Alison H [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mmm ... never really thought about that, but it is a bit like some Victorian tale in which people emigrate and forge completely new lives for themselves. After the very early books, in which we have Grizel, Faith and Mercy Barbour (who never really feature), Stacie, Rosalie and the Burnetts all coming to the school from Taverton, we never meet anyone else from the Bettanys' "old life".

Surely some of Madge's old friends would have had daughters who'd have been of school age by the Armishire/St Briavel's/Swiss years, not to mention all those cousins, and surely Jack and Jem would have been in touch with some relatives or old friends at home.

As you say, I suppose EBD just forgot about them. Or didn't want to introduce a load of background characters, like those soap opera weddings in which all the guests are people who live in Coronation Street/Albert Square/Emmerdale! It's just that she was so keen on giving new characters a CS link ...

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Now I'm imagining Joey really hating her London cousins with a vim and begging Madge not to offer them a place at the CS. None of them ever seem to go and visit family - even Joey et al visiting Madge or Dick once they move to Switzerland, which I think is a shame.

Perhaps the "small means" really did equal working class, and Madge didn't want to show Jem the other side of her life, or embarrass her relatives by seeming like she was showing off her rich husband, which is why they never appear in the books.

Author:  Alison H [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Ah, but Jem never introduces Madge to his relations either (apart from Margot and her daughters, who just sort of turn up) so maybe he had something to hide as well :wink: :lol: !

Nor, with very few exceptions, do any of the mistresses' relations send their daughters to the school.

Somewhere along the line, someone was definitely hiding something :lol: .

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Nor, with very few exceptions, do any of the mistresses' relations send their daughters to the school.



But who would want to go to school where your aunt/older sister is teaching at. I know there is Joey and Madge and Simone, Renee and Mademoiselle, but later on it would be difficult. I think there is a drabble archived where someone writes about Hilda Annersley's niece turning up and how hard that was for everyone

Author:  JackieP [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

And doesn't Kathie say in New Mistress that Nell Randolph is teaching at the Carnbach branch partly because she doesn't want to be working under Hilda...?

JackieP

Author:  MJKB [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Funny how people have a different idea of the aunts. I'd missed the fact that they were married with large families and mentally put them into the fussy great aunt category. In School At Joey complains about the fact that they have to visit them because "they fussed so". It's not the usual case for women with large families of their own to focus that much attention on a neice.
I thought of this thread yesterday when a friend of mine described somebody as having 'protestant features', meaning that they were good looking, fair with strong symetrical features. And this person is only in her early 40's! Old habits die hard.

Author:  Carrie A [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

On the subject of Aunts - why does Kathie Ferrars not refer to her aunt and uncle as 'Mum' and 'Dad'? After all she was put in their arms at a few days old. Surely, even if they told her about it when she was older she would have grown up thinking that they were her parents?

Author:  abbeybufo [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Presumably it's what you're taught to call the people who look after you. If they always called themselves 'Auntie' and 'Uncle' to her when she was learning to talk, that's how Kathie will think of them - even though emotionally she will feel for them as she would have done her parents.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD does seem to have quite a lot of her characters call what we would consider to be their parents 'Aunt' and 'Uncle' - look at Jacynth and Auntie. I think partly it is a mark of respect - they don't want the child to forget her actual parents, who would be their brother or sister.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

ChubbyMonkey wrote:
EBD does seem to have quite a lot of her characters call what we would consider to be their parents 'Aunt' and 'Uncle' - look at Jacynth and Auntie. I think partly it is a mark of respect - they don't want the child to forget her actual parents, who would be their brother or sister.


Especially not as Kathie's mother was her sister. I know I would never want my niece to forget her mother regardless of if I was bringing her up or not

Author:  MJKB [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I agree. It's a tribute to the deceased parents that they don't expect to take their place.
Regarding 'aunties' and 'uncles' - what EBD refers to as the brevit titles, that's a pet hate of mine. Your either an aunt or your not, and you can't be an aunt to a friend's child in the real sense of the word.

Author:  Alison H [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Not so much now, but when I was a kid I was always taught to refer to family friends and parents of my own friends as Auntie This or Uncle That, largely because calling them Mr/Mrs/Miss Whatever would have been too formal and at that time (1980s) it was considered impolite for a child to use an adult's first name, and at the time at which EBD was writing it would definitely have been considered rude for a child to call an adult by their first name.

I suppose it is a bit odd because you wouldn't call someone who wasn't a relation Mum/Dad/Grandma/Grandad, but I suppose it's just a convenient compromise term. When Mary-Lou first met Jack and Joey, for example, she was only 10, and it wouldn't have been considered appropriate for a 10-year-old to call adults by their first names, but calling neighbours/close family friends "Dr and Mrs Maynard" would have been too formal.

Jem and Jack seem to get most of the girls to call them "Dr Jem" and "Dr Jack", which now that I think about it is quite strange. Imagine if Joey'd asked people to call her "Mrs Joey" or even "Mrs Dr Joey" ... :roll: .

Were governesses generally referred to as "Miss/Mrs First Name" or was that just in The Sound of Music and The King and I :lol: ? I'm always surprised that the Queen and Princess Margaret were allowed to get away with saying "Crawfie" instead of "Miss Crawford" :lol: .

Not sure where EBD got "brevet aunt/uncle" from - "brevet"'s a term I always associate with the U.S. Army!

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Not so much now, but when I was a kid I was always taught to refer to family friends and parents of my own friends as Auntie This or Uncle That, largely because calling them Mr/Mrs/Miss Whatever would have been too formal and at that time (1980s) it was considered impolite for a child to use an adult's first name, and at the time at which EBD was writing it would definitely have been considered rude for a child to call an adult by their first name.


We always referred to my parents closest friends as Aunt and Uncle which was really nice especially as half of mine were on the other side of the world and the rest were scattered all over Australia and I hardly saw them, so I certainly never saw a problem with it and thought it was nice and normal

Alison H wrote:
Jem and Jack seem to get most of the girls to call them "Dr Jem" and "Dr Jack", which now that I think about it is quite strange. Imagine if Joey'd asked people to call her "Mrs Joey" or even "Mrs Dr Joey" ... :roll: .


I always thought it made them more approachable especially Dr Jem who was the doctor for many of the pupil's relatives such as Elsie's sister. It did maintain a touch of formality but wasn't completely formal. I'm sure the girls appreciated it and as some actually lived with him (the Linton's, Stacie etc) Dr Russell would have been more formal. I do remember Joey overhearing Gay and Jacynth and co referring to her as Joey and not Mrs Maynard and they said it was hard cos of all the older girls referring to her as plain Joey and the younger ones as Aunt Joey. And she did ask if they would do it in private rather than when the younger one heard. She always did come accross as being a little more on the formal side at times.


Alison H wrote:
Were governesses generally referred to as "Miss/Mrs First Name" or was that just in The Sound of Music and The King and I :lol: ? I'm always surprised that the Queen and Princess Margaret were allowed to get away with saying "Crawfie" instead of "Miss Crawford" :lol: .


I think governesses were referred to as Miss/mrs so and so. However, if someone works for the family for so many years I can see pet nicknames developing

Author:  Mel [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

The use of Aunt/Uncle in the CS seems to be without logic sometimes. In 'Exile' Robin is told to drop the titles for Madge and Jem because of Jo being M's sister or some such. All the Guernsey clan call Jo 'aunt' but Mary-Lou is allowed to drop it when she leaves school. Again, Mary-Lou is allowed to use Biddy's first name while she is still at school. Why? In 'Reunion' Len refers to Grizel as 'Auntie' like a five year old.There doesn't seem to be any consistency.

Author:  JB [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mel wrote:

Quote:
All the Guernsey clan call Jo 'aunt' but Mary-Lou is allowed to drop it when she leaves school. Again, Mary-Lou is allowed to use Biddy's first name while she is still at school. Why? In 'Reunion' Len refers to Grizel as 'Auntie' like a five year old.There doesn't seem to be any consistency.


I think Mary Lou is allowed to use "Biddy" as she has spent time with her out of school at Freudesheim.

I can see Jo asking people to drop the aunt because it fits in with her seeing herself as still a schoolgirl at heart and a chum to Mary Lou, etc. At the same time, she tries to keep her own children young and I think she'd be horrified at Len dropping the "aunt" when talking to Grizel. Interesting contradiction there.

Author:  claire [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

not really JB because if she admits her kids are older enough to drop the aunt then that makes her old.

I wonder if it's the age when they bring in the 'aunt' business that makes the difference, Mary-Lou was 10 but most of the guernsey mob were a lot younger (aside from Beth who I think has dropped it before CS and Barbara)

Author:  RroseSelavy [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mel wrote:
In 'Reunion' Len refers to Grizel as 'Auntie' like a five year old.There doesn't seem to be any consistency.


I think habits are hard to unlearn, though - when my aunt told me to drop the "Auntie," it was actually quite difficult not to automatically use it. (Same as when you meet your old teachers as an adult and can't get out of the habit of calling them Mr or Mrs so-and-so).

Author:  Thursday Next [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

My nephews, in their thirties, still call me auntie. My niece doesn't. Their choice, they were all told they did not need to call me aunt years ago. I sign myself by my name without the aunt. One or two friends of my nephews who knew me when they were young children also call me auntie.

Author:  MaryR [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Jem and Jack seem to get most of the girls to call them "Dr Jem" and "Dr Jack", which now that I think about it is quite strange. Imagine if Joey'd asked people to call her :D "Mrs Joey" or even "Mrs Dr Joey" ... .

Parish priests tend to do this nowadays. We call ours Father Keith, instead of using his surname, and it is much friendlier, but not over-friendly, and I think this is the way EBD uses Dr Jack, etc.

As others have said, "Auntie" was used all the time in earlier years when we knew someone well, but couldn't call them by their Christian names. NeitherI would never have attempted to call my aunts and uncles just by their Christian name when I grew up and yet, now, I never sign myself Aunie when writing to my nephews and they just call me Mary. How times change! :D

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I still (at eighteen) call my Aunt and Uncle with the title, though that is more because I don't want to seem disrespectful and upset them. How do you know when you're too old to do it?

Author:  Lottie [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

ChubbyMonkey wrote:
I still (at eighteen) call my Aunt and Uncle with the title, though that is more because I don't want to seem disrespectful and upset them. How do you know when you're too old to do it?

I think it's when they tell you that you're too old, or you realise that they've stopped using the Aunt or Uncle when writing to you or whatever. It's obviously going to depend on the families, and possibly be a generation thing, too. My brothers and sisters are happy for my daughters (now in their twenties) to use just their names, but I'm still expected to use Aunt and Uncle for my two remaining relatives (88 and 96), although when I used to talk to my mother about her brother and sister I never used the terms Aunt and Uncle, I just used their names. I'm not sure that that helps you.

Author:  Fiona Mc [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I still call my aunties and uncles, auntie and uncle. They're the only ones I have and I call everyone else by their first name. And a couple have said I could drop it if I wanted to, but for me it signifys that its a special relationship. And I'm 38 so I think it's a personal choice. Most of my nieces and nephews call me by my first name except the youngest ones but I've never insisted on it and left it up to what they feel like calling me.


I must admit I never understood why Mary Lou was allowed or even called Biddy auntie. She didn't meet her until Carola goes to the CS and I never saw how they would have been close out of school

Author:  Sugar [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I have biological Great Aunts and Uncles that I never saw as a child, (iron curtain was in the way!) they are still called or referred to as Auntie this and Uncle that. I do tend to get my languages muddled. One Aunt is said in English, the other in Lithuanian!

I also have a brevet Auntie (mum's best friend from antenatal) who is called Janet. As a child she was Auntie Janet, as a adult she said I could drop it. I objected so she became Auntie Jan because she insisted no adults called her Janet! We are both happy.

Interestingly, my friends children appear to be calling me Auntie but it appears to be a bit inconsistent with one family, who I see so rarely that the oldest (aged nearly 5) claimed he didn't know who I was!

Some of us foundation stones of the CBB have "Auntie Pat" and "Auntie Sue" because someone noticed the huge spread of ages at the first gather and thought it be funny to try the Auntie thing and it stuck!

Author:  Emsnan [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Even in my late 50's, I still call my one remaining Auntie by that title and wouldn't dream of dropping it. That would seem really rude to both of us. I don't have any nephews and nieces but my son and daughter, who are both in their 30's, call their Aunts and Uncles by their titles and I don't think it's ever occurred to either side to stop the custom.

I had two brevet relations when I was a small child, who were my next door neighbours, and couldn't understand for a while why we lost touch with this "auntie and uncle" when we moved house.

I still remember the feeling I had when my mother's best friend allowed me to stop calling her "Mrs .." for the first time and said I could use her first name. I was in my 20's by then and had left home but I can still picture the scene and thinking "I'm really grown up!!" How times change!!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Thanks for the advice :)

I had one berevt Auntie and Uncle, but all I remember about them is when my "Uncle" chased me both around the garden and into the house with the hose and got told off. :lol:

To go slightly back OT, I do like that Joey says everyone, almost, can call her Auntie, but I prefer Madge's approach of being Madame. Part of Joey's problem in being too much a part of the school, I think, is because when people call her that they always think of her being close to it. She could still be Frau Docter Maynard, or Mrs Maynard, without losing her schoolgirl nature.

Author:  mohini [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

In our culture it is it is not considered proper to call anyone by their first name,specially your elders as in teachers, elder brothers or sisters or cousins or strangers. Only those who are younger than you can be called by their first name.
And we call all brothers and sisters and cousins of my parents as auntie or uncle (though we have a separate title for mother's brother or sister and father's brother or sister.}
Children are taught since childhood and anyone who does not use the title is promptly scolded.
We even use the "Sie "form for elders or prominent persons.
Du form is used only for near ones and never never for your father or grandfather or teacher.
Though times are changing but children nowadays call their parents by name.

Author:  Sunglass [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

EBD is sensitised to the class nuances of forms of address, too, isn't she? I was thinking specifically about how the actual narration of Gay calls members of the family Gay and Jacynth meet on the train 'Grandma' and 'Father', which I don't think EBD would do if they weren't working-class semi-comic characters. That form of address might be respectful in some cultures - I mean, as a general usage, rather than by people who are actually the children or grandchildren of 'Father' and 'Grandma' but I don't think EBD means it that way here. (I mean, if Gay and Jacynth had met Mary-Lou, her mother and her grandmother on the train and not immediately been introduced, I don't think EBD would be referring to Doris and Mrs Trelawney as 'Mother' and 'Grandma'...)

Also, what about how CS characters address their own parents and relatives? There's so much stress, repeatedly, on the triplets being taught to call their parents 'Mamma' and 'Papa', not 'Mum' and 'Dad' or 'Momma' and 'Poppa' - though don't the boys start addressing Joey as 'Mum' in the later Swiss books and she seems to acquiesce? Does Ros Lilley address her mother as 'Mum' - and does that suggest it hints at a lower class status at the period EBD was writing? Clearly 'Grandmother' indicates a higher class status than 'Grandma', but does 'Aunt' vs' Auntie' have any class nuance?

[* Is one of those people EBD would have disapproved of who encourages all child acquaintance to call her by her first name from birth onward...]

Author:  Thursday Next [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Sunglass wrote:
Also, what about how CS characters address their own parents and relatives? There's so much stress, repeatedly, on the triplets being taught to call their parents 'Mamma' and 'Papa', not 'Mum' and 'Dad' or 'Momma' and 'Poppa' - though don't the boys start addressing Joey as 'Mum' in the later Swiss books and she seems to acquiesce? Does Ros Lilley address her mother as 'Mum' - and does that suggest it hints at a lower class status at the period EBD was writing? Clearly 'Grandmother' indicates a higher class status than 'Grandma', but does 'Aunt' vs' Auntie' have any class nuance?



I don't think the Mama and Papa is supposed to be a class thing as all the Russell and Bettany children call their parents Mum and Dad (or Mummy and Daddy when younger). I think that Mama and Papa is very much to point out Joey and Jack being unusual and very different from anyone else. I really don't think class comes into it. They wouldn't like Momma and Poppa because they are so American although there may be a class element in that.

Aunt tends to go with a name - ie Aunt Elizabeth - whereas Auntie seems to be used on its own as in the way Jacynth always talks about her aunt as Auntie without any name after it in the same way as she might have spoken of her mother as Mum or Mummy if she had been alive.

Author:  mohini [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Clearly 'Grandmother' indicates a higher class status than 'Grandma', but does 'Aunt' vs' Auntie' have any class nuance?

In Enid Blyton books, Aunt is used more as a formal while someone who is near and dear is Auntie.
And isn't there a mention in What Katy did where the author says that They (the children) never called her Auntie and all children will know what that means.

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Quote:
There's so much stress, repeatedly, on the triplets being taught to call their parents 'Mamma' and 'Papa', not 'Mum' and 'Dad' or 'Momma' and 'Poppa' - though don't the boys start addressing Joey as 'Mum' in the later Swiss books and she seems to acquiesce?


I have to confess to being very lazy in my drabbles and having 'mum' and 'dad' - because obviously Joey and Jack mellowed and let them talk like their friends at last. Yes.

Don't Joey and Jack originally say that they want to be called that to be different? Or Joey does. I can imagine Jack coming back from the front and demanding to know just why she'd been telling people that.

I think that again it comes down to class consciousness. Veta says 'Daddy' quite easily, and Corney says 'Poppa', but Joey seems to be much more uptight over the issue.

Author:  Emsnan [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

IIRC doesn't Margot start calling Joey and Jack 'Mum and Dad' first, as the triplets get older, while the other two are still saying Mama and Papa? And doesn't it say somewhere that Joey doesn't like it much but has had to put up with it (or words to that effect! I haven't got the books to hand!) I also seem to remember that someone referred to the triplets as 'trips' when they were quite young and I don't think she liked that either. But then she didn't like using someone's whole name, did she, and was always looking for ways "to shorten that long name of yours" and saying life was too short for any name of more than two syllables! Again IIRC, someone (I think Peggy) said something about no-one in their family ever using their full name, although they'd all got perfectly good ones. Certainly, very few of the Maynards or the Bettanys were ever known by their full name.

In some families I know it is considered more 'acceptable' to use the full name and more 'common' to shorten it whereas most of us look upon a shortened name simply as being more friendly with never a thought about the class issue.

Author:  Mel [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think Margot says Mother and Father, but Stephen refers to Jack as Pa and Jo gloomily thinks it will be Ma next. Somehow she accepts that from boys - she is more lenient with them.

Author:  Emsnan [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Mel wrote:
Somehow she accepts that from boys - she is more lenient with them.


I have to say, I never really thought it came across in the books that Joey bothered overmuch about the boys. Didn't she say once that she left the boys to Jack, and of course they were away for much of the year and out of her influence, whereas the girls were much closer at hand. For a mother who was so definite in her ideas about bringing up children, I always felt that once the boys went off to boarding school, she almost seemed to shrug her shoulders and say, 'right, that's it, they've gone!' I know this is a gross exaggeration and they do crop up here and there, but perhaps not as much as they would have done in real life. What do others think?

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I wish that EBD had shown us more of the boys and hadn't simply written them off. She had some really interesting characters that she could have used, and if she thought her fans wanted Joey enough to keep her in the series she could have shown a whole other side to her family. I can understand them going to boarding school, but she writes them out of the holidays a lot, too.

Such a shame that Joey just leaves them to Jack. I think he's a good parent, and I always read him as having a really good relationship with the girls, but Joey seems too caught up in herself and him to pay much attention to any of her children.

Author:  MJKB [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Emsnan wrote:
I still remember the feeling I had when my mother's best friend allowed me to stop calling her "Mrs .." for the first time and said I could use her first name. I was in my 20's by then and had left home but I can still picture the scene and thinking "I'm really grown up!!" How times change!!


Same here. Two sets of our next door neighbours became close friends of the family even after we moved away. At first we called both sets Mr and Mrs, then in more recent years they insisted on being known by their first names. When I address them I call them by their first names but I still refer to them as Mr and Mrs and think of them thus.
As regards auntie and uncle, we never called any adult by those titles unless they were related in that way to us. Old friends of my parents were either known by first names or in a few cases, by Mr and Mrs.
Two of my sisters married and settled in the US and their children always use the titles aunt and uncle, which annoys the rest of us greatly. None of our children use the titles and nor do any of my friends' nephews and neices. It appears to have disappeared in Ireland, certainly in Dublin anyway, since the '70's. The last time I visited my sister in New York my nephew who is 14 years younger than I 'auntied' me so I made it very clear that I wouldn't answer him if insisted on using the prefix before my name. Like everything else it's a matter of custom.

Author:  Róisín [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Two of my sisters married and settled in the US and their children always use the titles aunt and uncle, which annoys the rest of us greatly. None of our children use the titles and nor do any of my friends' nephews and neices. It appears to have disappeared in Ireland, certainly in Dublin anyway, since the '70's. The last time I visited my sister in New York my nephew who is 14 years younger than I 'auntied' me so I made it very clear that I wouldn't answer him if insisted on using the prefix before my name. Like everything else it's a matter of custom.


Certainly hasn't disappeared in the midlands or the west :lol: I have six aunts whose names I wouldn't dream of not sticking 'auntie' in front of. Similarly with uncle. I'm in my twenties but my sister is in her late thirties and is the same.

Author:  Alison H [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I always use "Auntie" and "Uncle" for aunts/great aunts, uncles/great uncles and some family friends. When I was little, parents' cousins were (admittedly only occasionally) referred to as "Cousin [first name]", but I think the only person in the CS books who does that is Thekla, and she does it when speaking to Marie who's only a couple of years older than her anyway.

I assume that Joey and Jack were called Ma-mah and Pa-pah, the old-fashioned upper-class way (we're told that Samantha van der Byl calls her father Papa pronounced Pappa, which suggests that that wasn't how the Maynards pronounced it) and, whilst I appreciate that Joey was just trying to be different but I can imagine that most people would have found it horrendously annoying and pretentious in the 1940s and 1950s! Stephen's friends at school probably made fun of him for referring to his parents like that - no wonder he started using different terms instead!

Author:  ChubbyMonkey [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Stephen's friends at school probably made fun of him for referring to his parents like that - no wonder he started using different terms instead!


*has to fight off plot bunnies*

It wasn't until I read 'Two Sams' recently that I realised it would be different - I always imagined that it was 'mamma' and 'pappa', without the emphasis at the end ('ma-mah' always makes me think of the duck in one TV adaptation of 'Wind in the Willows' who says it :oops:) But then, a lot of things which adult Joey does could be interpreted as pretentious - making your first topic of conversation about how wonderful your large family is fairly pretentious :roll:

Author:  MJKB [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Róisín wrote:
Certainly hasn't disappeared in the midlands or the west :lol: I have six aunts whose names I wouldn't dream of not sticking 'auntie' in front of. Similarly with uncle. I'm in my twenties but my sister is in her late thirties and is the same.


That really surprises me because no one in my generation of friends has ever been called 'aunt'by their nephews and neices, apart from my American sisters.
I live in an estate where there are a number of young families and all the children use first names for their neighbours. Ithink they tend to be more formal in the 'States.

Author:  JS [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

Alison H wrote:
Quote:
I assume that Joey and Jack were called Ma-mah and Pa-pah, the old-fashioned upper-class way (we're told that Samantha van der Byl calls her father Papa pronounced Pappa, which suggests that that wasn't how the Maynards pronounced it) and, whilst I appreciate that Joey was just trying to be different but I can imagine that most people would have found it horrendously annoying and pretentious in the 1940s and 1950s! Stephen's friends at school probably made fun of him for referring to his parents like that - no wonder he started using different terms instead!


I'm reading Two Sams for the first time in hardback at the moment, and was quite stunned last night to see that it was said explicitly that the Maynards put the stress on the second syllable of Mamma and Papa - think Grace Kelly in High Society when she's trying to be pretentious. I'd always read it in my head with no stress.

On that subject, do you think that Madame was pronounced like Ma-daahm - a la ballet school directors? I'd always said it madam (no stress) in my head.

Author:  Cel [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

JS wrote:
On that subject, do you think that Madame was pronounced like Ma-daahm - a la ballet school directors? I'd always said it madam (no stress) in my head.


I've always heard it in my head as Ma-daahm, maybe because the custom originated in Tirol with mainly Austrian girls, and that seems like more of a Continental pronounciation? Whereas I agree that Ma-mah and Pa-pah sound awfully affected.

Author:  Alison H [ Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think of Madame as being pronounced Madame the French way, just to sound a bit more Continental. I think Madam is usually abbreviated to Ma'am when used regularly ... or is that just for the Royal Family and people in TV police dramas :D ?

Ma-mah and Pa-pah sound fine in context, e.g. in TV adaptations of Jane Austen books, but I really do think that Stephen's friends would have laughed their heads off at him when they heard him refer to his parents as such in the 1950s. The poor boy!

Author:  JB [ Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

In Changes, Margot refers to Joey as Momma and Len says Joey has told her not to call her that. I'd assumed Ma-mah and Pa-pah from that.

I love that scene from High Society.

Author:  JackieP [ Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I think I assumed the Ma-mah and Pa-pah pronunciations from Joey's comment that 'I decided to come over all Victorian'!

JackieP

Author:  Loryat [ Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

I had lots of brevet aunts and uncles as well as family ones, and funnily enough called them by their 'titles' much longer than I did my family aunts and uncles. Though I think I had dropped them all completely when I was about six or seven. I think it's lovely to have brevet aunts and uncles though, and I think it must be quite nice to be accepted in that way. I'll definitely do it mith my kids, not so much for respect as because I think it's a really nice way of making someone feel like there is a connection. I'd only keep it up with young children though.

My cousin (who is seventeen) calls my mum and dad auntie and uncle, and it always sounds really strange to hear them addressed that way, as none of our cousins live near us so we don't see them that regularly. I wonder if she thinks we're all really rude to be calling her dad by his first name?

Author:  Kate [ Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

MJKB wrote:
Róisín wrote:
Certainly hasn't disappeared in the midlands or the west :lol: I have six aunts whose names I wouldn't dream of not sticking 'auntie' in front of. Similarly with uncle. I'm in my twenties but my sister is in her late thirties and is the same.


That really surprises me because no one in my generation of friends has ever been called 'aunt'by their nephews and neices, apart from my American sisters.
I live in an estate where there are a number of young families and all the children use first names for their neighbours. Ithink they tend to be more formal in the 'States.

I don't use Auntie or Uncle either and never have. Some of my grandmother's nieces call her Auntie, but they're the only people in my family who use titles. And we're very West! :) But I did call my parents Mama and Dada until I went to school and was laughed at.

Author:  Kirsty [ Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Themes: Class

My nephew (7) used to refer to me by my name only, whereas he refers to my younger sister & her husband with their title and name. it comes from when i was living at home with my parents & we used to babysit him quite often (they still do!), and that was what he heard me being named as.
That being said, he's started calling me & my husband by the titles now - however, he only started calling Chris 'uncle' after we got married. :D

Chris is an only child, and he always called his parents by their names, as that was how they referred to each other.
I still call my aunts and uncles by their titles, despite being told quite a few years ago now by one of the aunts that I could drop the title - it seemed wrong somehow.

All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/